https://before.town/posts/g7eovw43piaagie
❤1

Channel
@by_limboy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
571subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002021156659 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @by_limboy |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/by_limboy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 571 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 572 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 570 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 4 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (4 March 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 459 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
65 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 23 | 35.4% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 30.8% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 10.8% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 10.8% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 6.15% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 6.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://before.town/posts/g7eovw43piaagie
❤1
https://read.limboy.me/life-is-short/zh
互联网的黑暗森林理论 https://read.limboy.me/the-dark-forest-theory-of-the-internet/zh
https://jy.cafe/
❤3
https://before.town/
👍3
https://read.limboy.me/sam-altman-may-control-our-future-can-he-be-trusted/zh NewYorker 上的一篇关于 Sam Altman 的长文,把它翻译成了中文 核心围绕:「一个被多名前同事和董事形容为惯于欺骗、优先个人与商业利益、擅长现实扭曲场的领导人,是否真正值得托付足以改变甚至毁灭文明的超级AI技术」展开 PS: Aaron Swartz 临终前对 Sam Altman 的评价 > "You need to understand that Sam can never be trusted ... He is a sociopath. He would do anything."
👍1
🤔
🥰4
https://read.limboy.me/1984 捯饬了一个 subdomain 用来放一些自己觉得不错的内容。再也不用担心原文的排版问题,还可以放方便地放上译文,甚至一本书。
❤2
打算取消 Premium 订阅,然后看到了这个,那就再续三个月吧···
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
你别说,你还真别说
🤣5
走进一家麦当劳, 服务员们在开心地聊着社保、退休, 完全没有意识到即将被 AI 取代。 我只能上前打断她们: 这个瓶子不要的话,我就收走了。
😁13🤣2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @by_limboy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,043,199 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Limboy's Secret Garden” (@by_limboy), 571 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/by_limboy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.