Ким кимни ёкотганини вакт корсатади хозрча порла гузалим)
custom 54403539419109998244

Channel
@bxlv77
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
32subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002263482185 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bxlv77 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bxlv77 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 32 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 32 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 9 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
173 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5204049355295705891 | 32 | 18.5% | |
| custom 5213054948232692138 | 23 | 13.3% | |
| custom 5251319456117838983 | 22 | 12.7% | |
| custom 5440353941910999824 | 16 | 9.25% | |
| custom 5445270141866624806 | 16 | 9.25% | |
| custom 5233559311082345861 | 15 | 8.67% | |
| custom 5206302636873104822 | 12 | 6.94% | |
| custom 5204330022818563990 | 11 | 6.36% | |
| custom 5199666255270792959 | 5 | 2.89% | |
| custom 5240392518150935214 | 4 | 2.31% | |
| custom 5323577861351688035 | 4 | 2.31% | |
| custom 5422564754306648735 | 4 | 2.31% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 2.31% | |
| custom 5442824170876456451 | 3 | 1.73% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.578% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.578% |
Custom emoji. 13 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2025 to 22 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ким кимни ёкотганини вакт корсатади хозрча порла гузалим)
custom 54403539419109998244
Sevgi fazosi
custom 52063026368731048224custom 51996662552707929591custom 52040493552957058911custom 52043300228185639901custom 52130549482326921381custom 52513194561178389831custom 54452701418666248061
У медузага ухшайди Чройли лекн мияси йук🪼😂
custom 54452701418666248063custom 52043300228185639902custom 52130549482326921381custom 52335593110823458611custom 54403539419109998241
💘
custom 52040493552957058915custom 54403539419109998244custom 51996662552707929591custom 52043300228185639901custom 52130549482326921381custom 52335593110823458611custom 52513194561178389831custom 54452701418666248061
ربما في يوم من الأيام عندما أستيقظ، سيكون أول شيء أراه هو عينيك. Balki bir kun uyg'onsam birinchi termulgan narsam sening ko'zlaring bo'lar...)
custom 52063026368731048222custom 52130549482326921382custom 52040493552957058911custom 52513194561178389831custom 54403539419109998241
Мени севшингни согндим🌟
custom 52040493552957058913custom 52130549482326921382custom 54452701418666248062custom 51996662552707929591custom 52063026368731048221custom 54403539419109998241
мне лучше без тебя , но без тебя я лучше не стала , увы...
custom 51996662552707929591custom 52040493552957058911custom 52063026368731048221custom 52513194561178389831custom 54452701418666248061
(أنت أجمل شيء لا أملكه) (Дейди) Сен менда булмаган нарсаларнинг энг гузалисан..❤️
custom 52040493552957058914custom 52063026368731048224custom 54452701418666248064custom 52043300228185639903custom 52335593110823458612custom 52130549482326921381
хамма нарсадан чарчаган пайтимда хам кулишимга сабабчи бўлган ягона инсонимсан..
custom 52040493552957058915custom 54452701418666248063custom 51996662552707929591custom 52130549482326921381custom 52513194561178389831custom 54403539419109998241
Огрик?
custom 52040493552957058915custom 52043300228185639903custom 52335593110823458613custom 52513194561178389833
Фотимани Алидан олиб койган роббим сени мендан олмасмиди…
custom 52513194561178389833custom 52335593110823458612custom 52043300228185639901custom 52130549482326921381custom 54452701418666248061
тот самый разговор между сердцем и мозгом…
custom 52130549482326921385custom 52040493552957058913custom 52513194561178389832custom 52335593110823458611custom 54403539419109998241
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @bxlv77. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 840,927 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“bxlv.77” (@bxlv77), 32 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bxlv77.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.