Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BUZZ | Тула

@buzztula

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

100subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001180562004
TypeChannel
Username@buzztula
DescriptionТула, область, Россия. Эксклюзивная информация и горячие новости Чат - @buzztalk71 Обратная связь: @BUZZ_feed1back_bot @katerozze
Created10 May 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/buzztula

Growth

1007 August 2026 — 100 subscribers9 August 2026 — 100 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 99–101 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 10:47100no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:36100first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 16 October 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
659
Videos
131
Links
169

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 27s
Average length
1m 27s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

24 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤝1145.8%
👍729.2%
🔥28.33%
🥰28.33%
14.17%
💩14.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2023 to 15 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Feb 2024, 10:57 UTC480 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ну умер и умер, че бухтеть-то

🥰2🔥1

8 Feb 2024, 10:31 UTC535 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Думаю, что дальше результаты не изменятся. Поздравлю, вы не идиоты)

8 Feb 2024, 10:21 UTC454 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Вы бы проголосвали за Надеждина?

  1. Да19%
  2. Нет57%
  3. Кто это?24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Dec 2023, 14:44 UTC360 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @vzs071Photo

А вот еще любопытная информация о визите некой Мигалиной М.С. на Украину, злые языки поговаривают, что визит был в рамках некой программы дополнительного образования. Но конспирация прежде всего!

6 Dec 2023, 14:44 UTC458 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @vzs071Photo

Коллеги мне наверное попеняют, что контракт довольно старый. На что я отвечу, что хорошая и давняя знакомая нашего героя, не только соучредитель монополиста-субподрядчика по уборке территории города, но и лицо близкое сами понимаете к кому. А старая любовь, как и спонсорство оно не ржавеет.

💩1

6 Dec 2023, 14:44 UTC524 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @vzs071Photo

Ну и ещё одна конспирологическая сказка, не имеющая ничего общего с текущей действительностью.

6 Dec 2023, 14:44 UTC308 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @vzs071Photo

Тут коллеги по тульскому телеграмму разместили пост про одного любопытного персонажа, с блеском, благодаря своим спонсорам и кураторам, выходящего из любой дурнопахнущей ситуации. Добавлю немного фоток и поводов для грустных размышлений.

6 Dec 2023, 14:44 UTC331 viewsread 9 August 2026

Любопытную информацию о семье предателя Мигалина опубликовал его бывший партнер, которого Коняка в свое время кинул. Владельцу "Блохи-Инфо" есть за что не любить Сережу. Сам он отсидел за вымогательство и вышел только пару лет назад. Информацию мы не проверяли, все ниже приведенное - это личные выводы и данные Доронина👇

5 Dec 2023, 13:06 UTC≈27,700 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Разоблачение Коня: спалила живопырка Есть в Туле редкий шлимазл, которого зовут Сергей Мигалин. Этот поц раньше вел канал Тульская молва, но когда его сдеанонили хорошие люди, все поудалял и старался не отсвечивать. Точнее завел новый канал – «Конь валялся». Сам Мигалин почему-то дополнительно пишет «тульский», как будто у него целая городская сеть. Ну да ладно, к сути. Спалился наш предатель, ждущий поражения Росс

👍2🔥1

7 Nov 2023, 12:02 UTC590 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🔥Журналисты MySlo "сожгли" релейный шкаф П***еть - не мешки ворочать, и тульские писаки знают это не понаслышке. Тем более, что добрую половину этой ущербной братии понабрали с улицы. По крайней мере, такое впечатление складывается, когда читаешь их новости, в которых зачастую нуль верифицированной информации. Видели разгон о поджоге релейного шкафа в какой-то глуши? Его не было. Никто не заводил никаких дел. Но ни

👍5

19 Oct 2023, 15:18 UTC≈26,500 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

⚡️💰 Сколько стоит совесть? 300 000 рублей. По крайней мере такой вывод можно сделать, зная, сколько представители Манука Аветисяна, строящего гостиницу на месте парковки у «Искры», заплатили тульским СМИ (MySlo - гендиректор Татьяна Алексеева, "Первый Тульский" - главред Елена Кирьянова-Терёхина и др.) за неупоминание проекта в негативном ключе. Мы еще увидим материалы о том, насколько хорош бизнес Аветисяна – ведь

🤝111

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @buzztula. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Feb 2024, 10:21 UTCAnonymous Poll42 voters

Вы бы проголосвали за Надеждина?

  1. Да19%
  2. Нет57%
  3. Кто это?24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2023 to 15 August 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BUZZ | Тула” (@buzztula), 100 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/buzztula.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.