Video, posted without a caption

Channel
BUZZ | Тула
@buzztula
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
100subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001180562004 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @buzztula |
| Description | Тула, область, Россия. Эксклюзивная информация и горячие новости Чат - @buzztalk71 Обратная связь: @BUZZ_feed1back_bot @katerozze |
| Created | 10 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/buzztula |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 100 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 100 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 16 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 659
- Videos
- 131
- Links
- 169
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 27s
- Average length
- 1m 27s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
24 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤝 | 11 | 45.8% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 29.2% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2023 to 15 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Ну умер и умер, че бухтеть-то
🥰2🔥1
Думаю, что дальше результаты не изменятся. Поздравлю, вы не идиоты)
Вы бы проголосвали за Надеждина?
- Да19%
- Нет57%
- Кто это?24%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
А вот еще любопытная информация о визите некой Мигалиной М.С. на Украину, злые языки поговаривают, что визит был в рамках некой программы дополнительного образования. Но конспирация прежде всего!
Коллеги мне наверное попеняют, что контракт довольно старый. На что я отвечу, что хорошая и давняя знакомая нашего героя, не только соучредитель монополиста-субподрядчика по уборке территории города, но и лицо близкое сами понимаете к кому. А старая любовь, как и спонсорство оно не ржавеет.
💩1
Ну и ещё одна конспирологическая сказка, не имеющая ничего общего с текущей действительностью.
Тут коллеги по тульскому телеграмму разместили пост про одного любопытного персонажа, с блеском, благодаря своим спонсорам и кураторам, выходящего из любой дурнопахнущей ситуации. Добавлю немного фоток и поводов для грустных размышлений.
Любопытную информацию о семье предателя Мигалина опубликовал его бывший партнер, которого Коняка в свое время кинул. Владельцу "Блохи-Инфо" есть за что не любить Сережу. Сам он отсидел за вымогательство и вышел только пару лет назад. Информацию мы не проверяли, все ниже приведенное - это личные выводы и данные Доронина👇
Разоблачение Коня: спалила живопырка Есть в Туле редкий шлимазл, которого зовут Сергей Мигалин. Этот поц раньше вел канал Тульская молва, но когда его сдеанонили хорошие люди, все поудалял и старался не отсвечивать. Точнее завел новый канал – «Конь валялся». Сам Мигалин почему-то дополнительно пишет «тульский», как будто у него целая городская сеть. Ну да ладно, к сути. Спалился наш предатель, ждущий поражения Росс…
👍2🔥1
🔥Журналисты MySlo "сожгли" релейный шкаф П***еть - не мешки ворочать, и тульские писаки знают это не понаслышке. Тем более, что добрую половину этой ущербной братии понабрали с улицы. По крайней мере, такое впечатление складывается, когда читаешь их новости, в которых зачастую нуль верифицированной информации. Видели разгон о поджоге релейного шкафа в какой-то глуши? Его не было. Никто не заводил никаких дел. Но ни…
👍5
⚡️💰 Сколько стоит совесть? 300 000 рублей. По крайней мере такой вывод можно сделать, зная, сколько представители Манука Аветисяна, строящего гостиницу на месте парковки у «Искры», заплатили тульским СМИ (MySlo - гендиректор Татьяна Алексеева, "Первый Тульский" - главред Елена Кирьянова-Терёхина и др.) за неупоминание проекта в негативном ключе. Мы еще увидим материалы о том, насколько хорош бизнес Аветисяна – ведь …
🤝11❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @buzztula. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вы бы проголосвали за Надеждина?
- Да19%
- Нет57%
- Кто это?24%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2023 to 15 August 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@buzztula named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BUZZ | Тула” (@buzztula), 100 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/buzztula.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.