Channel
@buxaktiv_de
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
399subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001482231375 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @buxaktiv_de |
| Description | Informationen, Termine zu Veranstaltungen und Versammlungen. Hier auf diesem Kanal für Menschen in Buxtehude und Umgebung. |
| Created | 20 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/buxaktiv_de |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:50 | 399 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:19 | 399 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
30 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 13 | 43.3% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 30.0% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 16.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2024 to 2 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ihr Lieben, bei unserem Spaziergang am 12.01.2026 waren wir schon einige aber es werden immer mehr Menschen, die ein Zeichen setzen wollen. „Freiheit ist nicht, tun zu können, was man will, sondern nicht tun zu müssen, was man nicht will“ Heute, am 02.02.2026, 20 Uhr treffen wir uns in Buxtehude auf dem Rathausplatz zu unserem freien Spaziergang. Es ist keine Versammlung, und das ist auch richtig so. Wann? 02.…
👍8❤1
https://x.com/tom_bayou/status/1849721458978697309?s=52&t=uX11M7Nnmb_Ac7OBxLX_Hg
https://x.com/kubickiwo/status/1849719505057898588?s=52&t=uX11M7Nnmb_Ac7OBxLX_Hg
❤2
https://x.com/mwgfd_official/status/1848720640326643784?s=52&t=uX11M7Nnmb_Ac7OBxLX_Hg
❤1
Die Seite "Informed Choice Australia", die die den vielbeachteten Artikel "1000 Peer Reviewed Studies Questioning Covid-19 Vaccine Safety," enthielt, ist nicht mehr online. Hier ist der letzte Inhalt als PDF!
Masken: systematisches Review, Meta-Analyse, peer-reviewed. - Verminderter Blutsauerstoffgehalt (-24%) und das Volumen des ein- oder ausgeatmeten Gases (-72%). - gleichzeitiger Anstieg von Blut-CO2 (+64%), Herzfrequenz (+22%), systolischem Blutdruck (+21%) usw. - mehrere maskenbezogene Symptome könnten als Long COVID-19-Symptome fehlinterpretiert worden sein https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.202…
🌭1
Wolfenbüttel, 12.10.24 Sabrina Kollmorgen mit einem Spendenaufruf für Walter Weber, der wegen des Verdachts der Ausstellung unrichtiger Gesundheitszeugnisse immer noch vor Gericht steht ❤️Bankkonto des Fördervereins Weißer Kranich IBAN DE 56 7645 0000 0232 1701 91 !!Stichwort: Schenkung Dr. Walter Weber!!
Dissertation der TU München 04/05 zur Rückatmung von Kohlendioxid bei Verwendung von Op-Masken - Auszüge
File, posted without a caption
Hallo Frau Herman, hier ein paar Auszüge aus der Dissertation: Seite 14: Unter Verwendung von Operationsmasken findet kein ungehindertes Entweichen des unter Normoventilation ausgeatmeten CO2 statt. Dadurch kann es zu einer Akkumulation von CO2 unter den Operationsmasken kommen. Die mit CO2 vermehrt angereicherte Luft wird wieder eingeatmet, was einen daraus resultierenden Anstieg von CO2 im Blut zur Folge hätte.…
❤🔥2
☠️💉 Unfassbar!!! Nun steht tatsächlich Nebenwirkung Tod in der Packungsbeilage von Corminaty/ BioNTech! 👉 Informieren Sie jetzt andere über die Gefahr durch Impfungen und WHO ❤️💉Verein für Impfopfer💉❤️ www.impfopfer.info Wir lassen dich nicht ,im Stich'
❤1
https://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=14685 Der neue Beipackzettel ist da. Zur Vorlage bei Ihrem Arzt...
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @buxaktiv_de. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,061,908 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Buxaktiv” (@buxaktiv_de), 399 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/buxaktiv_de.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.