Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

«𝕭𝐔𝐓𝐂𝐇𝐄𝐑 𝓝𝐎𝐓𝐓»

@butcher_nott

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

102subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004467573040
TypeChannel
Username@butcher_nott
Description♤ᬽ┊ 𝐃𝐄𝐀𝐓𝐇 𝐖𝐈𝐋𝐋 𝐒𝐄𝐏𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐄 𝐔𝐒 » ◞ૢ۪۪۪۪ 𝐎𝐖𝐍𝐄𝐑 — @butchernott_bot 𝐌𝐎𝐍 𝐀𝐌𝐎𝐔𝐑 — @KATTER1R00MAN 𝐈𝐍𝐅𝐎 — @info_butcherr 𝟏𝟖+
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 9 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/butcher_nott

Growth

1029 Aug 2026, 06:15 — 102 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 10:02 — 102 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 06:159 Aug 2026, 10:02
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 101–103 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 10:02102no change
9 Aug 2026, 06:15102first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
150.6%
avg views ÷ 102 subscribers
Avg views / post
154
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
26.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held15 (9 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total2,150
Reactions total307
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
19
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

339 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51998906716069895115917.4%
custom 53368641665882155974914.5%
custom 52017982770365416594112.1%
custom 52021021502676982534112.1%
custom 53370016828511005283811.2%
custom 52021133987870460953510.3%
custom 5337221709730708043329.44%
custom 5339288924734913043329.44%
custom 5201949348216211908102.95%
custom 542278159432053593920.59%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 339reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
49
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 15 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
33
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @butcher_nott. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC14 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @KDigg1xxPoll

кому переписку?

  1. Теодор.46%
  2. Джинни.16%
  3. Энтони.27%
  4. Миллисента.18%
  5. Абисс.11%
  6. Камертон.8%

The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed 🐈‍⬛ #трюфель.

8 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC21 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @TNottForYou

все за меня конечно же.

Signed 🐈‍⬛ #трюфель.

8 Aug 2026, 22:22 UTC24 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @L30R1C3Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾 с меня: 1⃣задать вам пару вопросов про вас, ваш дневник, ветку. с вас: 1⃣обязательна подписка на канал. 2⃣репост в свой канал на 1-2 часа. 3⃣прислать в комментарии ссылку на ваш дневник, имя и фамилию на английском. от лица дневника не принимаю, обязательно от личного аккаунта. 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ➖еста: 2/4 🌾🌾🌾🌾🌾

8 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC29 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ashleydiarys

3 >>>>> 130 давайте максимальный репост?🍒

8 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC36 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Fiery_SanktPhoto

ᗪOᗯᑎ Iᑎ TᕼE ᑌᑎᗪEᖇᗯOᖇᒪᗪ Τⲉⲟⲇⲟⲣ Ηⲟⲧⲧ — ⲥыⲏ Αυⲇⲁ, ⲇⲟⲙυⲕ 13 Аид — в древнегреческой мифологии бог подземного царства мёртвых и одновременно название самого этого царства. Он — старший брат Зевса и Посейдона, один из трёх великих богов-олимпийцев. Из-за связи с Подземным миром дети Аида часто кажутся отстраненными, тихими и холодными со стороны. По большей части рассчитывают на себя нежели, чем на других. Они имеют

6 Aug 2026, 23:51 UTC101 views45 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 533700168285110052810custom 52017982770365416599custom 53368641665882155979custom 52019493482162119084custom 53392889247349130434custom 51998906716069895113custom 52021021502676982533custom 52021133987870460953

4 Aug 2026, 23:06 UTC157 views79 reactions33 Starsread 9 August 2026

— ☺️лабость. Ты ненавидешь её больше всего, но показываешь мне её так, будто это дар, mi tierno, — Драко не убирает ладонь с шеи, но отводит взгляд, прекрасно зная, что для Нотта это будет ощущаться ещё больнее. — ☺️ ты добиваешь меня, Драко, зачем, mon destin? Для чего? Чтобы было ещё хуже, да? Ты привык к моим страданиям и блять, я слаб перед тобой, Драко, я ненавижу это, но.. но я не могу по другому. Ты знаешь же

custom 519989067160698951120custom 533686416658821559717custom 520179827703654165915custom 53370016828511005285custom 53372217097307080435custom 53392889247349130435custom 52019493482162119084custom 52021021502676982534

4 Aug 2026, 23:06 UTC144 views46 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

➿⭐️ULNERABILITY《🌹》 🍼🤩☺️дивительно, как кто-то может разбить вам сердце, а вы всё равно будете любить его всеми его осколками.🍼 — ☺️ говорил тебе, что ты никто для меня, Нотт. У меня нет каких-то нежных чувств к тебе! Это фальшь, Теодор, твои больные выдумки.— Малфой даже не стал смотреть на своего друга, он лишь усмехнулся, достав из кармана цепочку, что была подарена Теодором на Рождество и бросил её в ноги сокурсни

custom 533700168285110052810custom 51998906716069895117custom 53368641665882155977custom 52017982770365416595custom 52021133987870460954custom 53372217097307080434custom 53392889247349130434custom 52021021502676982533

2 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC174 views35 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53372217097307080439custom 52021021502676982538custom 53392889247349130438custom 52017982770365416593custom 51998906716069895112custom 52021133987870460952custom 53368641665882155972custom 53370016828511005281

2 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC201 views71 reactions5 Starsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 520211339878704609518custom 519989067160698951117custom 520210215026769825314custom 52017982770365416598custom 53370016828511005284custom 53372217097307080434custom 53368641665882155973custom 53392889247349130433

30 Jul 2026, 15:34 UTC398 views31 reactions7 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

《🎁》здесь собраны все дневники, за которыми я активно слежу. очень сильно люблю их творчество! вы — мои фавориты.

custom 519989067160698951110custom 533722170973070804310custom 52021021502676982539custom 53368641665882155972

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @butcher_nott. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTCAnonymous Poll83 voters

кому переписку?

  1. Теодор.46%
  2. Джинни.16%
  3. Энтони.27%
  4. Миллисента.18%
  5. Абисс.11%
  6. Камертон.8%

The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 80,571 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“«𝕭𝐔𝐓𝐂𝐇𝐄𝐑 𝓝𝐎𝐓𝐓»” (@butcher_nott), 102 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/butcher_nott.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.