Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Яна Ива салонный бизнес как игра. Осталось стать победителем.

Channel

Яна Ива салонный бизнес как игра. Осталось стать победителем.

@businessalon

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

568subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001658711569
TypeChannel
Username@businessalon
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/businessalon

Growth

5685725707 August 2026 — 572 subscribers7 August 2026 — 571 subscribers14 August 2026 — 568 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 567–573 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:16568-3
7 Aug 2026, 23:22571-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:48572first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 7 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.1%
avg views ÷ 568 subscribers
Avg views / post
114
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held19 (7 June 202631 July 2026)
Views total685
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 04:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3162.0%
🔥918.0%
👍510.0%
🤔36.00%
🏆12.00%
🥰12.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC58 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

3

Signed Яна Иванченко

20 Jul 2026, 11:22 UTC176 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Наша анкета с опросом по теме продажи в салоне красоты уже заполнила более 29 администраторов. Казалось бы, страх « не хочу навязываться» уже должен был из жить себя, но нет именно он лидирует в головах наших администраторов. 24 июля мы встречаемся с резидентами сообщества, чтобы поговорить на тему как увеличить продажи в салоне красоты если у вас есть администраторы отправьте им нашу анкету чтобы наши исследования

Signed Яна Иванченко

17 Jul 2026, 16:57 UTC123 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Коллеги моя команда проводит исследования в теме продаж товаров в салоне красоты. Выше выложила готовый текст сообщения отправьте своим админам пусть заполнят анкету после поделюсь с вами результатами ❤️

1

Signed Яна Иванченко

17 Jul 2026, 16:56 UTC123 viewsread 7 August 2026

Дорогие администраторы!!! Сообщество собственников индустрии красоты проводит исследование по изучению темы « продажи товаров в салоне красоты» опрос анонимный так что можете не стесняться писать смело ваше предложение и опыт. https://forms.gle/7gwAsW72fTeXberu9 Большая просьба поучаствовать и заполнить анкету нам очень важно понимать ваши боли страхи и препятствия непосредственно тех людей которые работают с клиен

Signed Яна Иванченко

17 Jul 2026, 16:56 UTC106 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Если у вас в салоне не такие продажи товаров, то вы точно что то не то делаете 😊😉

Signed Яна Иванченко

2 Jul 2026, 10:44 UTC149 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Когда заканчивается конференция, гаснет свет, разбирают сцену и разъезжаются участники… Но остается самое ценное — люди и эмоции❤️ «Бизнес Эволюция 4.0» состоялась И сегодня я хочу сказать огромное спасибо каждому, кто был частью этого события Спасибо нашим участникам. За доверие. За ваши горящие глаза, вопросы, идеи и желание расти. Именно ради этого мы создаем «Бизнес Эволюцию» Спасибо нашим спикерам. Каждый из

🔥6👍31🏆1🥰1

Signed Яна Иванченко

26 Jun 2026, 06:51 UTC170 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот картинка которая была использована и по которой прилетела досудебная претензия. Как всегда хочу вместе с вами порассуждать Ваши действия ? Как бы решали ситуацию? А может вы на практике уже столкнулись с такой ситуацией напишите в комментариях

🤔1

Signed Яна Иванченко

26 Jun 2026, 06:49 UTC155 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

Signed Яна Иванченко

25 Jun 2026, 03:03 UTC152 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кто такие «авторские тролли» Их суть в том, что они приобретают права на чужие произведения не для творчества, а для массового вымогательства денег через суд . Принцип работы прост: · Массовые иски: В США один известный «тролль» подал почти 1300 исков за 4 года. И вот моя подруга собственник салона красоты попала в их ловушку! Кому интересно узнать историю поставьте реакцию на пост А кто тоже стал жертвой таких т

9

Signed Яна Иванченко

24 Jun 2026, 07:07 UTC125 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Знаете кто такие «авторские тролли»?

  1. Знаю14%
  2. Нет79%
  3. Знаю и сам попался на их удочку7%
  4. Знаю я был истцом в таком деле0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Яна Иванченко

24 Jun 2026, 07:05 UTC120 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Дружочки у меня к вам новая тема на поговорить Только у меня к вам просьба, давайте мне реакции, когда я пишу интересно - «смайлик» Неинтересна тема ставьте «какашку» это лучше чем молчание 🙏🏻❤️ Давайте потренируемся 😍

🔥1

Signed Яна Иванченко

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @businessalon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Jun 2026, 07:07 UTCAnonymous Poll14 voters

Знаете кто такие «авторские тролли»?

  1. Знаю14%
  2. Нет79%
  3. Знаю и сам попался на их удочку7%
  4. Знаю я был истцом в таком деле0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Jun 2026, 16:10 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

Негативный отзыв, что делать

  1. Удалить12%
  2. Игнорировать12%
  3. Ничего страшного, других найдем0%
  4. Сделать так, чтобы клиент написал положительный отзыв76%
  5. Другое, напишу в комментариях6%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 183,564 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Яна Ива салонный бизнес как игра. Осталось стать победителем.” (@businessalon), 568 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/businessalon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.