Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

БУЛ

@bulmedia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

39subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002470427987
TypeChannel
Username@bulmedia
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 24 January 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bulmedia

Growth

3911 Aug 2026, 15:17 — 39 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 14:15 — 39 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 15:1712 Aug 2026, 14:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38–40 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:1539no change
11 Aug 2026, 15:1739first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

186 reactions across 19 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🌭3921.0%
🔥3016.1%
🍌2312.4%
147.53%
🍾147.53%
😢94.84%
👍73.76%
🤯73.76%
🫡63.23%
👾42.15%
😁42.15%
🤣42.15%
🌚31.61%
👀31.61%
👏31.61%
😱31.61%
21.08%
🍓21.08%
👨‍💻21.08%
🤬21.08%
5 further kinds52.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2025 to 18 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Oct 2025, 08:06 UTC91 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Пока не пилю ролики на Ютуб, пилю вот кеки в Соре

🔥3🤣3🌚1🤯1

24 Jul 2025, 11:07 UTC157 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Норм? Или кал и зря купил? 🤔

👾4🔥4🌚2🌭1💊1🙈1

24 Jul 2025, 10:48 UTC151 views17 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Што ж, вроде все. Нашел свое новое гнездышко 💼

🔥95👍2🎉1

31 Mar 2025, 17:42 UTC239 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🌭3🔥2

25 Mar 2025, 11:25 UTC238 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Если все будет ок, на следующей неделе начнутся собесы. Первые на очереди — VK и WB 🤢 (затем Avito, 2ГИС и тд) Пожелайте мне удачи, ребят!

👍53🌭2

11 Mar 2025, 16:57 UTC238 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Отбой. Эти гомики попросили отменить заказ, т.к у них нет версии 8/128 ГБ синего цвета... А на 256 ГБ не могу себе позволить потратиться Такие дела 😢

😢3🌭2🤬2

10 Mar 2025, 16:42 UTC189 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Кстааати. Тут же еще вот что. Обещают до 26 марта привезти. Будем тестить 💼

🔥5🌭3👀1

10 Mar 2025, 16:01 UTC156 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Привет. Как вообще дела у вас? Я вот к собесам готовлюсь 🌚

4🌭2👨‍💻2🤯1

2 Mar 2025, 11:28 UTC171 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🫡6🌭32

13 Feb 2025, 07:39 UTC170 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Почему нет видео? Потому что мне не нравится, что получается Причем отдельный кек, что я сейчас в Бангкоке. И тут снимай не переснимай красивые кадры для нового видео, чтобы было прям как кино Но мне не нравится имеющийся на руках сценарий (уже третья версия, переписанная с нуля). И в целом, то, к чему идет этот ролик еще на этапе текста Сажусь вот переписывать. Опять. Теперь уже в четвертый раз

😢4🌭31🍌1🤗1

2 Feb 2025, 14:34 UTC156 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Визуал у этого парня просто ебейший. Теперь хочу так же Да и мысли интересные вкинул. Передавайте ему там привет от меня https://youtu.be/AQ1hTj2Ze6Q?si=M047dVJyk94RVGIG

🌭2🍾21🍌1

1 Feb 2025, 07:05 UTC125 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Какие же OpenAI трясучники... Я не знаю, связано ли это со взрывной популярностью DeepSeek или нет. Но я прям вижу, как Альтмана и его команду начало трясти Мало того, что эти клоуны забанили мой аккаунт на ровном месте (аккаунт, в котором ничего, кроме программирования не обсуждалось, но исправно оплачивался Plus около полутора лет), так еще перфоманс со скринов выдали... Будем посмотреть, какой кек выкинут дальш

🤯3🌭2🍌2😢2🍾1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @bulmedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,098,540 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“БУЛ” (@bulmedia), 39 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bulmedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.