Photo, posted without a caption
❤1

Channel
@bullheadcalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
210subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002059978332 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bullheadcalls |
| Description | 记录高质量一级信息。请自己做研究,所有内容均不是投资建议。DYOR,NFA. |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bullheadcalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 210 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:22 | 210 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 19 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
17 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 29.4% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 23.5% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 17.6% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2025 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
你有没有想我?❤️
🔥2👍1
https://t.me/pepeboost_xlayer_bot?start=ref_0on3dh pepe的ok链bot
嗨,好久没跟你联系了啊 看你朋友圈很早就在发ETH之类的东西,感觉你是一直在炒币吗? 哈哈,其实也没啥事,就是今天看到说什ETH快新高了,好像都3万人民币一个了,我记得那会最先看你朋友圈发的时候,以太坊才几千块钱一个 感觉你肯定赚了很多钱吧,哈哈,也没啥特别重要的事,就是跟你联系下,增进下感情 对啦,所以你是不是赚了很多钱啊?你好厉害啊!
❤2🤡2
预售一共收了12342ETH,预售的代币锁仓四个月,开盘无抛压,29号晚九点
远古巨鲸为何在我买入后频繁苏醒? 资本财团为何在我开单后停止买入? 美联储为何在我止损后不断讨论降息? 我的10u又为何引起了美国经济反复通胀?
啊,你说你只买了以太坊?以太坊是什么呀,哦价格没涨啊,那时候是三千,现在还是三千啊。好吧,那太可惜了,没事你还是挺厉害的,懂这么多,要是都买了比特币就更厉害了!我先去洗澡了
嗨,好久没跟你联系了啊 看你朋友圈很早就在发比特币之类的东西,感觉你是一直在炒币吗? 哈哈,其实也没啥事,就是今天看到新闻说什么比特币新高了,好像都快100万人民币一个了,我记得那会最先看你朋友圈发的时候,比特币才几万块钱一个 今天看到比特币新高了,感觉你肯定赚了很多钱吧,哈哈,也没啥特别重要的事,就是跟你联系下,增进下感情 对啦,比特币都这么涨了,所以你是不是赚了很多钱啊?你好厉害啊!
😁1
群友救济我一下吧,7月份到现在就吃了一顿饭,人现在也是过得越来越落魄了,真不知道以后要怎么活下去……
邀请您参加腾讯会议 会议主题:web相亲联谊活动第一期 会议时间:2025/06/26 20:30-23:00 (GMT+08:00) 中国标准时间 - 北京 点击链接入会,或添加至会议列表: https://meeting.tencent.com/dm/MPoOLnQqxmR4 #腾讯会议:532-797-744 复制该信息,打开手机腾讯会议即可参与
https://fxtwitter.com/JamesWynnReal/status/1938138999174140015
https://fxtwitter.com/abyssofgambling/status/1938103441185972383 今晚九点,欢迎来HK雷氏牛英俊老师推特space参加web3相亲大会。
❤1🤡1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @bullheadcalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🐮BullHead Calls” (@bullheadcalls), 210 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bullheadcalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.