А опишите свой июль в трех словах?)
🔥3❤1👍1

Channel
@bulatgilemhanov
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
605subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001065390124 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bulatgilemhanov |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bulatgilemhanov |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 605 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 606 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 609 | +2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 607 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 608 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 611 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 611 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
643 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 317 | 49.3% | |
| 🔥 | 156 | 24.3% | |
| 💯 | 89 | 13.8% | |
| 👍 | 59 | 9.18% | |
| 🥰 | 16 | 2.49% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 0.778% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.156% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 643 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bulatgilemhanov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 January 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
А опишите свой июль в трех словах?)
🔥3❤1👍1
В самОм слове «невозможно» - заключена возможность, обращали внимание? Невозможно - слово, которое просто кто-то когда-то придумал (и это нормально, тут никаких претензий) Но проблема в том, что наш мозг так легко хватается за это слово, чтобы упростить (по его мнению) нам жизнь - что зачастую мы даже не пробуем! Вот в этом вся беда 😌 Невозможно - это не факт, это только мнение. Это голос в голове. И в том, что д…
❤11💯6🔥4🥰2
Сегодняшний день может стать для тебя большим шагом вперёд. А может - не стать. От тебя зависит 😉
❤14🔥5💯3🥰1
Жизнь - такая короткая вещь Поэтому: • Определитесь со своими ценностями (не оглядывайтесь на других людей, они живут свою жизнь, вы - свою) • Поймите, что для вас самое важное • И успевайте Как говорится, you don’t have forever ☝️ Я вас люблю, каждого кто меня читает (и особенно тех, кто комментирует и лайкает), и пишу вам это только из любви ❤️
❤42🔥8👍4💯4🥰2
Это вот вам, чисто поугорать 😂 Комменты под рилсом приветствуются, конечно же 😉 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DZe96gLoydO/?igsh=MXM3YW85czV0eDg1cg==
🔥5💯1😁1
Если делать - то делается, реально Я заметил: ключевое отличие успешных людей - не в том, что они не боятся… а в том, что они боятся - но делают Бояться - можно, не делать - нельзя Я всё сказал. С вами до результата, Булат «Пуля» Гилемханов 🙌
🔥18❤8🥰6👍2
Важная, очень важная информация у меня для вас: если даже не всё в вашей жизни так, как вам хотелось бы - от этого вы не перестаете быть хорошими людьми, не перестаете быть достойными любви, не перестаете быть ценностью перестаньте стыдиться себя и того, что у вас в жизни на сегодняшний день запомните мантру на такой случай: «как есть» вы живы, и это главное. вы живы, и значит у Вселенной ещё есть на вас какие-то…
❤35🔥16👍9💯5🥰2👏1
Про мой личный челлендж ❤️ Моя инста: https://www.instagram.com/bulatbullet
❤9👍5🔥5
Формула нового уровня в деньгах и в жизни в целом Два самых топовых навыка для кардинального роста в деньгах: 1. Задавать себе правильные вопросы 2. Давать себе честные ответы Хочу подчеркнуть: эти навыки - именно для кардинального роста. Не для роста на 10% или 20% (что тоже нормально и хорошо, кстати), но сейчас я веду речь именно о кратном росте. Для небольшого, эволюционного роста обычно нужно просто делать …
🔥12❤9👍5
Не позволяйте внешнему шуму отвлекать вас от того, кем вы хотите стать В жизни по ходу нашего движения к желаемому часто появляются отвлекающие факторы, это окей Забывать о том, куда ты вообще идешь из-за этих отвлекающих факторов - это не окей Для того, чтобы не забывать и не сбиваться со своего пути, есть много инструментов (которые лучше всего работают в совокупности). Вот топ-5 инструментов, по моему мнению: …
🔥19👍12❤7💯2🥰2
Будьте благодарны за жизнь. Не все дошли так далеко 😉
❤18💯15🔥5👍1
❗️ Так, дорогие мои люди, если тг заблочат, на всякий случай вот вам ссылка на моё сообщество в ВК: https://vk.ru/bulatgilemhanov Просьба подписаться, чтобы не потеряться нам с вами 🙏
❤9👍4🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bulatgilemhanov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Если всё закроют к херам - то где вы предпочтете читать контент: в ВКонтакте или в Максе?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лично с Булатом” (@bulatgilemhanov), 605 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bulatgilemhanov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.