Развиваю свои клубы и помогаю расти коллегам. На канале публикую материалы по повышению загрузки, возвратам гостей и формированию команды.
Автор: @skyk44
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 422–424 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 11:00
423
no change
9 Aug 2026, 10:51
423
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
84.0%
avg views ÷ 423 subscribers
Avg views / post
355
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held
20 (23 March 2026 – 28 July 2026)
Views total
1,776
Reactions total
49
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
17
Links
32
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
211 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5920075812911976155
50
23.7%
custom 5866369239740320716
49
23.2%
custom 5886539179256450622
35
16.6%
custom 5814656450517015834
33
15.6%
custom 5778252123032524043
21
9.95%
custom 5859638811239124220
14
6.64%
custom 6006030246082517830
9
4.27%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 211reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔧 Настроил таргетированную рекламу в ВКонтакте
Последний раз я запускал таргет для своих клубов около года назад. С тех пор рекламные бюджеты сильно сократились и в приоритет ставил продвижение на картах, так как считаю их более результативными.
Однако для молодых клубов таргет все еще отличный инструмент для набора первой аудитории. По статистики, клубы получают до 60% новых гостей по сарафанному радио. Но вы где-…
💰 Начали продавать безлимитные абонементы на месяц
Давно приглядывался к этой позиции, но все никак не доходили руки запустить. А тут недавно гость пришел в клуб и сам спросил есть ли у нас безлимит на месяц. По итогу гость так и не купил, но позицию мы ввели.
🤔 Высчитываю стоимость
Основываясь на средней стоимости часа, устанавливаю планку окупа абонемента в 100 часов минимум и округляю под «красивую» цену. Задача…
📞 Открытие клуба с нуля. Часть вторая, где расскажу про собеседования и запуск рекламы
Пару постов назад рассказал про текущий большой проект, в котором участвую. Пишу, что сделали за последнюю неделю:
— Провели десять собеседований админов за два дня. Тратили по 15-20 минут на каждого человека. Кратко рассказывал о проекте и потом проходили по анкете кандидата. Обращали внимание на то как человек формулирует мысли,…
🍷 Сообщества владельцев и сотрудников компьютерных клубов
В посте расскажу в каких телеграм-группах состою, где общаюсь и обмениваюсь опытом. Там часто бывает шумно, но и обсуждается много полезного.
🎮 Компьютерные клубы
Реинкарнация старейшей группы, образовавшейся на базе конференций NVIDIA. На данный момент к этому бренду никакого отношения уже не имеет, однако включает в себя почти 600 участников. Обсуждаются б…
🔫 Отменили игрофикацию и ввели классические штрафы
В декабре рассказывал, как мы ввели систему мотивации сотрудников, построенную на игровых элементах. Спустя пол года признаю ее неэффективность и перехожу на обычные штрафы.
Кратко как было:
В начале месяца, каждое заведение получает по 100 💊 Есть список задач: уборка мест, ответы в соц. сетях и другие. Когда админы не выполняют задачу — клуб теряет «жизни». Когда …
🔧 Помощь с открытием клуба с нуля. Рассказываю как готовим заведение к работе
В июне включился в крутой проект в центральной части России. Владельцы сначала изучили всевозможные данные из открытых источников о бизнесе компьютерных клубов. А потом добрались до меня со списком оставшихся вопросов. По итогу, с начала лета, консультирую их по множеству моментов и вместе готовим площадку к открытию.
Формат работы: ежене…
😈 Практическое применение аналитики данных из API Langame
Компьютерный клуб обычно наблюдает выручку и загрузку в целом. Но не видит, какие товары действительно зарабатывают, какие гости составляют ядро, какие смены сильнее работают с баром и где в залах активность ниже нормы. Я собрал статистику по своим клубам через Langame API и предлагаю сделать такой же анализ для вас.
Вывел четыре основных направления, которы…
🕵️♂️ Создаем базу знаний на основе открытого чата Langame:
1. Берем открытый чат Langame: https://t.me/langamers.
2. Выгружаем оттуда все данные: с десктопной версии заходим в группу и ищем «Экспорт истории чата».
3. Архивируем полученные данные и загружаем их в любой аналог ChatGPT.
4. Просим языковую модель извлечь информацию по нужной теме.
Кроме того, можно привязать свой Google Drive к аккаунту ChatGPT и попр…
BUFF & BH | Развитие компьютерных клубов pinned «✏️ Навигация по каналу Развиваю свои клубы и помогаю расти коллегам. На канале публикую материалы по повышению загрузки, возвратам гостей и формированию команды. 💰 Предложения для клубов: — Первичная аналитика по API Langame — Большой консалтинг для компьютерных…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @buff44. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 28 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BUFF & BH | Развитие компьютерных клубов” (@buff44), 423 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/buff44.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
