Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bürger für Thüringen

Channel

Bürger für Thüringen

@buergerfuerthueringen

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

231subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001706228835
TypeChannel
Username@buergerfuerthueringen
Created2 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/buergerfuerthueringen

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

231234232.56 August 2026 — 233 subscribers7 August 2026 — 233 subscribers15 August 2026 — 234 subscribers22 August 2026 — 233 subscribers4 September 2026 — 232 subscribers19 September 2026 — 231 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 44 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 231–234 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 10:40231-1
4 Sept 2026, 14:17232-1
22 Aug 2026, 21:57233-1
15 Aug 2026, 04:46234+1
7 Aug 2026, 02:47233no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:58233first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

257 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍19475.5%
👎187.00%
👏187.00%
93.50%
🔥62.33%
🤬62.33%
😁31.17%
🎉10.389%
😢10.389%
🥰10.389%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 257 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2024 to 6 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2024, 07:31 UTC≈1,510 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Teurer als nötig! Der ehemalige Gesundheitsminister Jens Spahn hat in der Frühphase der Corona-Pandemie den Preis der Masken stark angehoben – gegen eine Empfehlung seiner eigenen Fachabteilung. Das geht laut der FAZ aus internen Mails des Ministeriums hervor. Statt der empfohlenen 3 Euro netto je Maske entschied sich Spahn nur einen Tag später für 4,50 Euro pro Stück. also für ein Plus von 50%. Dies führte dazu, d

👍7🔥21🥰1

29 Jul 2024, 14:49 UTC≈6,360 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Am 1. September ein Zeichen setzen 🕊 Zu den Landtagswahlen in Thüringen haben wir die Chance, mit unseren Stimmen ein Zeichen für den Frieden zu setzen. Diesen Frieden wollen wir alle, dass ist klar. Doch die Ansichten darüber, wie dieser zu erreichen ist, gehen weit auseinander. Thüringen hat, wie viele Teile Deutschlands, die Gräuel und Verwüstungen des Zweiten Weltkriegs und der Nachkriegszeit erlebt. Diese hist

👍13

25 Jul 2024, 10:58 UTC490 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @volksbegehren2023Photo

„De-Banking“: Der lautlose Angriff auf oppositionelle Medien Banken in Deutschland kündigen immer häufiger ohne Begründung Konten von regierungskritischen Publizisten und Medienunternehmen – laut Multipolar-Recherchen etwa 40 Mal seit 2020. Befeuern Leitmedien und staatlich finanzierte diese Politisierung der Kontoführung und setzen Banken unter Druck? Eine Recherche zu Ausmaß und Hintergründen eines Phänomens, das

👍3🔥3

24 Jul 2024, 17:58 UTC448 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @volksbegehren2023Photo

Quelle: https://x.com/UteBergner

👍12👏3

24 Jul 2024, 11:15 UTC≈1,320 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Unzensiert und Ungeschwärzt! #RKIProtokolle Dank eines Whistleblowers des Robert-Koch-Instituts offenbaren die nun vollständigen RKI-Protokolle weitere brisante Details, die vor der Öffentlichkeit geheim gehalten werden sollten. Darin zeigt sich in deutlich, wie diverse Entscheidungen nicht auf rationalen, wissenschaftlichen Abwägungen beruhten und dabei 83 Millionen Menschen belogen und betrogen wurden. Wir können

👍11👏2

1 Jul 2024, 16:45 UTC≈2,340 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ist direkte Demokratie in Thüringen überhaupt gewollt? Eine berechtigte Frage wenn man unsere Anforderungen mit denen in der Schweiz vergleicht... Hier besteht dringender Handlungsbedarf! In einer Demokratie muss zur politischen Beteiligung aufgerufen werden, anstatt durch umfangreiche Hürden zu entmutigen. 👉 Folgt uns auf: t.me/buergerfuerthueringen

👍14

8 Jun 2024, 09:10 UTC657 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @volksbegehren2023Photo

Wir brauchen Frieden! Leider ist Deutschland hierbei mit immer weiteren Waffenlieferungen auf dem falschen Weg und sollte sich ein Beispiel an Ungarn nehmen: Dort fand am 1. Juni ein gigantischer Friedensmarsch mit mehreren hunderttausend Teilnehmern statt, auf dem Ministerpräsidenten Viktor Orbán folgendes verkündete: „Wir ziehen nicht in diesen Krieg und werden nicht auf fremder Erde für andere Interessen sterben

👍46👏3

7 Jun 2024, 08:39 UTC≈1,030 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

5 Jahre im Thüringer Landtag... Dr. Ute Bergner zieht Bilanz zum Ende der Wahlperiode in Thüringen. Hier geht's zum Video: 👉 https://youtu.be/y7nCkHI2s44?si=tWTM-H1QlWTAUfR9 t.me/buergerfuerthueringen

👍13

6 Jun 2024, 15:32 UTC≈7,260 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ist Widerspruch nur noch für Reiche möglich? Stell dir vor, es sollen bei dir im Wald oder in unmittelbarer Nähe zum Wohnort neue Windkraftanlagen errichtet werden und du reichst daher beim zuständigen Umweltamt einen Widerspruch ein. Nun erreicht dich ein Schreiben, dass dich eine Bearbeitungsgebühr bis in Höhe von 3.000€ erwarten kann, wenn du diesen Widerspruch nicht bis zum 16. Juni zurückziehst. Klingt absurd

👍15😁2

4 Jun 2024, 16:49 UTC≈32,900 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👆 Mit diesen Worten hat sich heute ein Anwohner aus dem Saale-Holzland-Kreis an uns gewandt. Anlass ist ein vom Umweltamt erhaltenes Schreiben, welches ihn sowie wahrscheinlich all diejenigen erreichte, die ebenfalls inhaltlichen Widerspruch zu aktuellen Vorhaben des Windkraftausbaus einreichten. Im Schreiben wird darauf hingewiesen, dass eine Widerspruchsbearbeitung kostenpflichtig ist und der Widerspruch noch bis

👎18🤬6👍2😁1😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @buergerfuerthueringen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bürger für Thüringen” (@buergerfuerthueringen), 231 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/buergerfuerthueringen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.