Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Звенящий притон Бубенца

@bubenbell

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

111subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001368084896
TypeChannel
Username@bubenbell
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/bubenbell

Growth

1117 Aug 2026, 20:29 — 111 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 07:02 — 111 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 20:299 Aug 2026, 07:02
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 110–112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 07:02111no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:29111first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 17 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
55.9%
avg views ÷ 111 subscribers
Avg views / post
62.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
28.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held13 (17 March 20267 August 2026)
Views total186
Reactions total53
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
824
Videos
47
Links
72

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
9m 17s
Average length
9m 17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

186 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53685566701358364114926.3%
custom 53435455938075216434624.7%
custom 53683914169741554504122.0%
custom 52897227558711629002312.4%
custom 5222202120471591480168.60%
custom 5219675837887956268115.91%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
197
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 13 we hold a reading for · 62%
Most on one post
34
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bubenbell. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 March 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC38 views19 reactions31 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Как бы сейчас сказал великий дракон Мушу из мультфильма «Мулан» - «Моя крошка стала совсем взрослой...» и пустил бы слезу ❤️

custom 53683914169741554508custom 53685566701358364117custom 53435455938075216433custom 52897227558711629001

6 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC47 views20 reactions25 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Финансовая грамотность покинула чат. Но фигурка была со скидкой 50%. Кто мы такие, чтобы пройти мимо распродажи? 😄

custom 536855667013583641112custom 52222021204715914805custom 53683914169741554502custom 52196758378879562681

27 Jul 2026, 18:14 UTC101 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Устраиваем переписку выживших калужских косеров, присоединяйтесь 😜

custom 52222021204715914805custom 52196758378879562684custom 53435455938075216434

27 Jul 2026, 17:49 UTCviews —1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 53435455938075216431

3 Jun 2026, 18:56 UTC160 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @rafy_wayPhoto

🩵❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🩵 Вы ждали? Вы ждули. Вот и долгожданный розыгрыш на 2 бесплатные укладки простой или средней сложности! 🩶🩵🩵❤️❤️❤️❤️🩵🩵 🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵 🩵🩵🩵🩵👇 ❤️Будет выбрана среди ваших хотелок. В комментарии под постом в моём канале прикрепите референс персонажа (с разных сторон желательно), имя и фандом. Победитель будет выбран мной. Можно прислать до 3 вариантов 🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵 🩵🩵🩵🩵👇 ❤️Чистый рандом. Под постом укажите поряд

custom 53435455938075216435

1 Jun 2026, 19:24 UTC118 views22 reactions22 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

С началом лета! 😉 #bubenbellcos

custom 536839141697415545010custom 53435455938075216437custom 52222021204715914803custom 52897227558711629002

1 Jun 2026, 06:45 UTC92 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @kashisempaiPhoto

Всем привет! Знакомьтесь, это Томас, мой котик, ему 3 года. До этого здоровый и игривый молодой усатый сэр в середине марта стал чувствовать себя плохо. Сначала врачи обнаружили некритичный песок в мочевом, но потом воспалилась и начала отслаиваться слизистая мочевого. Ему тяжело ходить в туалет и порой приходится ставить катетер, чтобы хоть как-то помочь ему. Сейчас ему приходится давать кучу лекарств, в том числе

custom 52222021204715914802custom 53435455938075216432

16 May 2026, 20:08 UTC122 views10 reactions34 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Сербские LORDI и Австралия мне зашли 😁 Не нарушаем традицию и смотрим финал 🦆 Кто ещё смотрит? Кто ваши фавориты?

custom 53435455938075216436custom 53683914169741554503custom 53685566701358364111

6 May 2026, 16:02 UTC163 views19 reactions27 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Это было давно и неправда. 🤍 Но в этом году Code Geass исполняется 20 лет 🤍 Двадцать лет с момента, когда мы впервые услышали про Зону 11, увидели Лелуша, получили приказ жить - и узнали, что шахматы, мехи, революция и подростковая травма могут существовать в одном кадре. Фото

custom 53435455938075216437custom 53683914169741554506custom 53685566701358364114custom 52897227558711629002

29 Apr 2026, 16:11 UTC168 views19 reactions11 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Похоже, ко мне едет новый косплей 👀 Или последствия ночного шопинга... Хотя иногда это одно и то же 🤣

custom 53685566701358364119custom 53435455938075216435custom 53683914169741554505

10 Apr 2026, 15:06 UTC204 views29 reactions25 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

😁😆😁 Написать своим подписчикам, что они самые лучшие, несмотря на то, что постов в последнее время очень мало Последние пару месяцев у меня ушли на здоровье, ментальное состояние и поиски работы. А поиск работы сейчас — это отдельный аттракцион, от которого кукуха едет знатно. Думаю, те, кто тоже через это проходил в последнее время, меня поймут. Очень надеюсь, что скоро все немного выровняется: получится разобрать

custom 536855667013583641113custom 52196758378879562686custom 53435455938075216435custom 53683914169741554505

17 Mar 2026, 14:40 UTC184 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @imanhelVideo

«Косплееры работают, организаторы зарабатывают.» Пытаюсь посчитать сколько можно заработать на косплей фестивале в своем городе

custom 52897227558711629009custom 53435455938075216431custom 53685566701358364111

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @bubenbell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Звенящий притон Бубенца” (@bubenbell), 111 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bubenbell.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.