90后的反差的人妻少妇 ,翻墙出来玩的,图个开心与刺激,不是小姐,有同城的成熟素质男士可以聊聊,聊得来有感觉可以线下 把浪漫留给值得的人,把时间留给对的人。开心就好… 25岁以下的小孩子就不要来了 点击私信➡️ @qqa8523 🔚

Channel
萤火虫漫展💯cosplay制服JK
@buai789456
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
13,522subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003316661741 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @buai789456 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/buai789456 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 13,522 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 13,521 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 13,520 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 13,522 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.89%
- avg views ÷ 13,522 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 661
- 21 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 21
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (12 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 13,881 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1h 19m
- Average length
- 8m 48s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
💥PG电子试玩- https://p389.com 🎉注册账号加爆率 - https://c2145.com 🫕开户一百送一百 - https://t.me/playace33 🎆红单群不中包赔 - https://t.me/tuidandezhou 🤣成年人的机器人 - @K8masix6bot 🎹海外ip注册畅玩域名 - https://c2147.com
#Puy_Puy Raze [22P-757MB] #萤火虫 #漫展 #COS
#不呆猫 灰丝迷人御姐 [52P 264MB] #御姐 #丝袜 #吊带袜 #情趣 #胸贴 #萤火虫 #漫展 #COS
国产巨乳姐姐 夏鸽鸽不想起床 - 猫耳百合 #萤火虫 #漫展 #COS
【极品阿黑颜福利姬 咕姆gomu Cos 远坂凛 足交骑乘榨精】 福利姬咕姆gomu最新一条,直接把远坂凛的Cos玩到这个尺度,阿黑颜大奶配上足交骑乘再掐脖子,骚得我当场就停不下来。画面里高潮翻白眼加狠狠内射,老司机看完只想反复回味。 #咕姆gomu #cos #足交 #榨精 #乘骑 #萤火虫 #漫展 #COS
90后的反差的人妻少妇 ,翻墙出来玩的,图个开心与刺激,不是小姐,有同城的成熟素质男士可以聊聊,聊得来有感觉可以线下 把浪漫留给值得的人,把时间留给对的人。开心就好… 25岁以下的小孩子就不要来了 点击私信➡️ @qqa8523 🔚
💥PG电子试玩- https://p389.com 🎉注册账号加爆率 - https://c2145.com 🫕开户一百送一百 - https://t.me/playace33 🎆红单群不中包赔 - https://t.me/tuidandezhou 🤣成年人的机器人 - @K8masix6bot 🎹海外ip注册畅玩域名 - https://c2147.com
#幼水铃衣 黄豆粉 [90P-1.04GB] #萤火虫 #漫展 #COS
#小容仔咕咕咕w FGO 虞美人[36P 192M] #旗袍 #御姐 #眼镜娘 #肉腿 #巨乳 #萤火虫 #漫展 #COS
【日本高颜值coser 福利作品上线 化身二次元肉便器 白丝湿穴被狂插不停】 日本高颜值coser表面清纯可爱,私下却是极品反差骚货。她穿着角色扮演服跪在男人面前主动张开双腿,把早已湿透的小穴完全送上去,被粗硬阴茎直接贯穿到底。肉棒在紧致骚穴里凶狠抽插,每一次都带出大量淫水 #日本 #二次元 #白丝 #狂插 #小穴 #萤火虫 #漫展 #COS
90后的反差的人妻少妇 ,翻墙出来玩的,图个开心与刺激,不是小姐,有同城的成熟素质男士可以聊聊,聊得来有感觉可以线下 把浪漫留给值得的人,把时间留给对的人。开心就好… 25岁以下的小孩子就不要来了 点击私信➡️ @qqa8523 🔚
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @buai789456. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,026,537 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@buai789456 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026 · confirmed gone 14 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“萤火虫漫展💯cosplay制服JK” (@buai789456), 13,522 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/buai789456.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.