Channel
@CGLQDZ
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
32,225subscribers
-2,638 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001075962996 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CGLQDZ |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CGLQDZ |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 32,225 | -293 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 32,518 | -524 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 33,042 | -517 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:11 | 33,559 | -343 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 33,902 | -710 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 34,612 | -251 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 34,863 | first reading |
133 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 133 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 133 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 339,478 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 94 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
😀🔤9️⃣🔤🔤🔤🔤😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 顶级域名 · 信誉大盘 · 公平透明 信誉铸就品牌，选择U9大额无忧 😔实时返水1️⃣🔤3️⃣🔤最高5️⃣🔤 😔逢9️⃣必发 每月三期 福利回馈 😔新人福利三存😀😀😀😀😀🔤 😔代理推广最高1人=😀😀😀😀🔤 😔一键登录,方便快捷,免实名零等待 😔TG小程序投注入口：@u9gwbot 😀😀😀😀 : U9.com 😀😀😀😀 : @U9gwcom 😀😀😀😀 : @U9KF #U9国际 #信誉保障 #实力大盘
#吃瓜 #美乳 堪比西瓜 😲
#突发事件：就在刚刚，西港警方突击包围了“潮汕海鲜大酒楼（保利）”，现在警方已经冲进去按人了，但是还是有部分狗推趁乱逃了出来，轻功都用上了，飞檐走壁！
摇一摇
✨ 抖阴在这儿等你很久了～ 💕 来抖阴，人工精选的真货色直接塞满你屏幕！ 💌 各种反差婊女神深夜投稿、岛国最新流出无码片段、黑料吃瓜第一手现场，本地真实约战记录…… 精品视频：全都是你夜深人静时最想点的禁忌！🐯 🔥 不水不广告，点开就是高能，肾上腺素直接爆表！ 点击👇方进入（每日狂更无删减 ） 🥰 抖阴 - 合集全家桶 🥰 😍 抖阴 APP下载 😜 抖阴 在线网址
Photo, posted without a caption
#最新消息：老挝万象雅典饭店被突袭，这次里面的推推在劫难逃了，直接全部围起来了。
182体育 😂😂😂😂 2026世界杯官方指定投注平台 ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ 1820183.com 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🛳不限IP 免实名 无需绑银行卡和手机号 🛳存款加赠 😀 🛳每日提款不限额度不限次数 🛳电子可拉2万一注 🛳高端嫩模 劳力士手表 奔驰e300 🛳周流水彩金每周 68888 🛳双重签到彩金 16888+3888 🛳双重日存彩金 128888+4688 🛳大额出款奖励 8888-128888 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🚊 PG《麻将胡了》爆出 121W丨提款127W 🚊 NBA连中三元精准下注豪揽 45W丨提款40W 🚊 PA《百家乐》豪赢 184W丨提款 183W 🚊 PP《糖果1000》甜蜜暴击 100W丨提款142W 🚊 26年度5月丨极速提现汇总 🚊 26年度6月丨巅峰收益档案 🚊 26年度7月丨资产翻倍实录 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 客服： @TY18288 频道…
球速体育 😂😂😂😂 相信品牌的力量，老品牌，值得信赖 ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ qs2160.cc 😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ⚫全球不限IP 免实名 ⚫ 无需绑银行卡和手机号 ⚫ 每日提款不限额度不限次数 ⚫ 高端嫩模 劳力士手表 奔驰e300 ⚫ 尊享豪礼等你来领 ⚫ 周流水彩金68888 ⚫ 双重签到彩金16888+3888 ⚫ 双重日存彩金128888+4688 ⚫ 大额出款额外奖励8888-128888 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😂 PA 真人丨实力玩家单日提款990W ❤️ 极速糖果丨20次免费旋转爆500W ❤️ 体育捷报丨 单日疯狂收益 320 W ❤️ PP 电子丨麻将大胜 100 暴击250W ❤️ PG 麻将丨单日三次千万大奖提3480W ❤️ PG 麻将丨爆1038万—成功提款1104W ❤️ PG 麻将丨爆1006万—累计提款1480W ✅体育红单：@qswj4 ✅福利频道：@qswj88 ✅…
反驳流氓逻辑的不同方式 文将vs武将 ⠀
#吃瓜 #美女 做你的御姐 🤣
狗子的婚礼
Showing the 12 most recent of 133 posts we hold for @CGLQDZ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 539,638 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“吃瓜猎奇🍑内涵段子🛜” (@CGLQDZ), 32,225 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CGLQDZ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.