Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ботов.НЕТ | База каналов

@btvNET

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

74subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002349280911
TypeChannel
Username@btvNET
DescriptionБаза проверенных Telegram-каналов с целевой вовлечённой и платёжеспособной аудиторией Добавить канал в базу бесплатно - лс @oldbo4
Created19 February 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/btvNET

Growth

746 August 2026 — 74 subscribers9 August 2026 — 74 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 73–75 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 21:4574no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:0174first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 19 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
3
Videos
1
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
866.7%
👍433.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2025 to 22 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Feb 2025, 06:00 UTC≈1,630 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Экономь время и деньги на закупах в Телеграм! У пользователей нашей базы всегда дешевый подписчик. Привет 👋 Меня зовут Роман, он же OldBoy. Владелец базы проверенных каналов Ботов.НЕТ Давай я расскажу, что здесь к чему: — для чего нужна база Ботов.НЕТ — как тут всё работает — как добавить канал в базу — что входит в Ботов.НЕТ и сколько стоит По любым вопросам обращайся ко мне в лс @oldbo4

5👍2

21 Feb 2025, 12:58 UTC≈1,360 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ботов.НЕТ — это база только чистых и проверенных каналов. ❌ Каталог, в который попадают только после тщательной проверки на ботоводство, смену тематики, пост залива (прямой/байт), скам. А это сильно упрощает работу не только закупщикам, но и владельцам каналов. В базе сейчас: ✅ ВБ (взрослая жца) - 98 каналов ✅ Дизайн и ремонт - 27 каналов ✅ Психология ЖЦА - 67 каналов ✅ Психология МЦА - 95 каналов ✅ Лингвистика -

3👍2

20 Feb 2025, 14:15 UTC940 viewsread 9 August 2026

Хочешь зарабатывать с нами? Переходи в партнёрку — ТЫК

20 Feb 2025, 14:14 UTC908 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Для владельцев каналов есть возможность добавить свой канал в базу каналов Ботов.НЕТ Мы знаем, что успешная работа канала строится не только на закупке рекламы, но и на её продаже. Чтобы твой канал был заметен для рекламодателей — добавь канал в базу. Это бесплатно. Напиши в лс @oldbo4 начиная с фразы «добавить канал в базу» + ссылка на канал. Перед добавлением обязательно проверяем канал. Поэтому если канал ботов

20 Feb 2025, 14:13 UTC781 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Как работает закрытая база каналов Ботов.НЕТ 1️⃣ шаг — проверка каналов. Площадки попадают в базу через два фильтра. Во-первых. Мы подбираем и отсеиваем каналы лично через сервисы аналитики, словно мы закупаем рекламу самим себе. Во-вторых. Часть площадок тестируется в наших проектах и те, что показывают отличный результат — отправляются в базу. Так мы исключаем наличие ботов и добавляем площадки только с целево

20 Feb 2025, 09:03 UTC472 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Для чего нужна база Ботов.НЕТ? База проверенных каналов нужна всем, кто закупает/планирует закупить рекламу в Telegram, а так же хочет обеспечить поток качественных и заинтересованных подписчиков-лидов с высокой покупательской способностью для себя или своего клиента. Избегая при этом: — изнурительного залипания в сервисах аналитики — переплаты за софт по анализу и подбору каналов — залив ботами, детьми и арабами —

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @btvNET. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 430,702 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ботов.НЕТ | База каналов” (@btvNET), 74 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/btvNET.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.