Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ♡BTS UPDATES & EDITS♡

Channel

♡BTS UPDATES & EDITS♡

@bts_army_queen

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,096subscribers

-177 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001493795408
TypeChannel
Username@bts_army_queen
Description• WELCOME ARMY • ⇒ BTS UPDATE & EDITS Promo & Request : @bts_update_edits_bot ⇢ It is true, when BTS meets ARMY, the desert becomes an ocean.
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/bts_army_queen

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 4 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@bts_army_queen/61090 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC@foreverrrbts/7247810 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC1.00under a minute
@foreverrrbts/7248921 Aug 2026, 02:58 UTC@bts_army_queen/61370 · this entry21 Aug 2026, 02:59 UTC1.0072 seconds
@bts_army_queen/61473 · this entry23 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC@foreverrrbts/7249223 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC1.0041 minutes
@foreverrrbts/7249323 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC@bts_army_queen/61474 · this entry23 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC1.006 minutes
@aestheticfairy12/760321 Aug 2026, 02:58 UTC@bts_army_queen/61370 · this entry21 Aug 2026, 02:59 UTC1.0072 seconds
@bts_army_queen/61473 · this entry23 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC@aestheticfairy12/760723 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC1.0041 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@foreverrrbts6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0072 secondsthis entry (4–2)
@aestheticfairy126 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0072 secondseven
@hobishope76 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0065 minutesthis entry (5–1)
@weloveour7crackheadz13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@weloveour7crackheadz (12–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 134 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 4 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @bts_army_queen — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 4 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

16,09516,34716,22116,0967 August 202612 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 97 days, net -177. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,057–16,385 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 23:1516,096+1
10 Nov 2026, 17:4516,095-8
9 Nov 2026, 03:0716,103-12
7 Nov 2026, 20:4916,115-9
6 Nov 2026, 18:3716,124-1
5 Nov 2026, 20:3916,125+11
4 Nov 2026, 23:2916,114+11
4 Nov 2026, 02:3116,103-9
2 Nov 2026, 22:5516,112-6
1 Nov 2026, 23:1116,118-3
31 Oct 2026, 22:0816,121-8
30 Oct 2026, 21:2816,129-16
29 Oct 2026, 18:3916,145-18
28 Oct 2026, 19:4916,163-21
27 Oct 2026, 20:3016,184-7
26 Oct 2026, 16:5616,191+6
24 Oct 2026, 19:1716,185-16
23 Oct 2026, 19:2716,201-10
22 Oct 2026, 20:5616,211-15
21 Oct 2026, 20:5716,226first reading

Engagement

338 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 80 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.57%
avg views ÷ 16,096 subscribers
Avg views / post
253
81 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
81
of 338 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 77 of 81 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held338 (7 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total20,456
Reactions total1,023
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 07:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈39,200
Videos
≈9,900
Links
≈4,230

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
19h 32m
Average length
12m 13s

Measured directly from 96 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,272 reactions across 302 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,08672.2%
❤‍🔥44210.3%
💘2826.60%
🍾1964.59%
😍1132.65%
🥰521.22%
🔥270.632%
🤣220.515%
🍓150.351%
👍60.14%
😁50.117%
🌚40.094%
💯40.094%
🕊40.094%
😎30.07%
🦄30.07%
🫡30.07%
👌20.047%
👀10.023%
💋10.023%
1 further kind10.023%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 304 of the 338 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,272 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 338 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 81 posts held from the last 30 days (1.23%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 02:29 UTC117 views3 reactionsread 14 November 2026

💛💛💛💛 💛💛💛💛 💛💛💛 💛💛💛💛 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ 💛💛💛 🔴🔴 Good Morning Bubs ㅤㅤㅤㅤHave you Subscribe to All those amazing channels?! 🌟 If you haven't then join now Its your last chance ⏰ The channel owner will delete these links after 2 hours Join as soon as possible 🌟 ㅤ 🌟https://t.me/addlist/hugxPRa9-AViYTU1 💛ㅤ ㅤㅤ

❤3

Signed ♪ 𝗺͠𔘓𝚌Ᏺɩ̇ ✿ ᴹᵘˢᵉ

13 Nov 2026, 19:59 UTC148 views1 reactionsread 14 November 2026

ㅤㅤㅤㅤ💛💛💛💛💛💛💛💛 ㅤㅤ💛💛BEST ✚ FOLDER 💛💛 🤩 I have made some different folders of above channels in different categories ✉️ ⠀⠀ᜳ🍜᠂ ○ᩙ ᜓ⠀ BTS Concert Asia 2026 world tour ⠀⠀ᜳ✈️᠂ ○ᩙ ᜓ⠀ Telegram Winter Fashion sale ⠀⠀ᜳ👑᠂ ○ᩙ ᜓ⠀ 10/10 Korean Skincare Products ⠀⠀ᜳ🌟᠂ ○ᩙ ᜓ⠀ Winter Soft Aesthetics ⠀⠀ᜳ🌸᠂ ○ᩙ ᜓ⠀ Earn money online and become independent ⠀⠀ᜳ🤩᠂ ○ᩙ ᜓ⠀ Ongoing Korean and Chinese Drama ⠀⠀ᜳ💙᠂ ○ᩙ ᜓ⠀ D’FESTA: THE ORI…

❤1

Signed ♪ 𝗺͠𔘓𝚌Ᏺɩ̇ ✿ ᴹᵘˢᵉ

13 Nov 2026, 17:56 UTC164 views1 reactionsread 14 November 2026

ㅤㅤ🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂 ⃨⏜᷼ ㅤ ׄ ‌ ᰰ⏝ᰰ ֵ 👑 Highly Verified Channels Picked By Telegram 📱 BTS 🩷 :- https://t.me/addlist/hugxPRa9-AViYTU1 ꒰ 💙 ꒱ --> RM Official ꒰ 🤍 ꒱ --> Jin Official ꒰ 🤎 ꒱ --> Suga Official ꒰ 💚 ꒱ --> Jhope Official ꒰ 💛 ꒱ --> Jimin Official ꒰ ❤️ ꒱ --> V Official ꒰ 💖 ꒱ --> Jungkook Official Kpop 🎸 :- https://t.me/addlist/hugxPRa9-AViYTU1 🌟 ⤿ Stray Kids 🌟…

❤1

Signed ♪ 𝗺͠𔘓𝚌Ᏺɩ̇ ✿ ᴹᵘˢᵉ

13 Nov 2026, 17:31 UTC184 views12 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

New video of #V for Harper’s Bazaar Korea! 💜 “Midwinter’s Dream — a short film with V” ⌜ @bts_army_queen ⌟

❤8❤‍🔥4

Signed ⊙⊝⊜

13 Nov 2026, 16:06 UTC214 views12 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

#jungkook weverse post💜🐰 [TRANS] Jungkook | Weverse 🐰 How many hours have I been fasting now? 🐰 I'm at 39 hours of fasting. But the event is over now, so... 🐰 (lifting the snack up to inspect it) How do you eat this? 🐰 (closing the box) I'll take this with me. 🐰 I wanna eat it. 🐰 I'm on my way to grab a meal right now, and I just couldn't hold back. I have to eat. 🐰 I bought a film camera. I haven't gotten the film…

❤‍🔥8❤3💘1

Signed ⊙⊝⊜

13 Nov 2026, 15:55 UTC202 views15 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

261113 Jin Weverse post with Jimin and j-hope 🐹: “You all worked so hard…” *In Korea, all discharged soldiers are required to attend an annual reserve-duty training even after completing their mandatory service. #jungkook weverse comment on jin post💜 🐰: Good work ⌜ @bts_army_queen ⌟

❤14💘1

Signed ⊙⊝⊜

13 Nov 2026, 15:54 UTC187 views15 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

#BTS via Instagram Story 💜 “1 billion streams for #Jin's "Don't Say You Love Me"! Thank you, ARMY, for all the love and support!” ⌜ @bts_army_queen ⌟

❤12😍3

Signed ⊙⊝⊜

13 Nov 2026, 14:05 UTC257 views10 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

MMA VOTING 📍 Melon App/Web (20% of score): Free: 1 vote daily | Paid: 3 votes daily 🔗 Vote on Melon: http://melonsmp.link/mma2026⁠ 📍 Berriz App (Global TOP 10): Vote for BTS daily! 🔗 https://berriz.in/en/vote/mma2026⁠ ⏳ Voting ends: November 13, 11:59 PM KST. 💜 Every vote matters! Keep voting for BTS! Last 1 hour left 📌 ⌜ @bts_army_queen ⌟

❤9🍓1

Signed ⊙⊝⊜

12 Nov 2026, 16:00 UTC396 views13 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

MMA VOTING 📍 Melon App/Web (20% of score): Free: 1 vote daily | Paid: 3 votes daily 🔗 Vote on Melon: http://melonsmp.link/mma2026⁠ 📍 Berriz App (Global TOP 10): Vote for BTS daily! 🔗 https://berriz.in/en/vote/mma2026⁠ ⏳ Voting ends: November 13, 11:59 PM KST. 💜 Every vote matters! Keep voting for BTS! Last 23 hours left 📌 ⌜ @bts_army_queen ⌟

❤12🍓1

Signed ⊙⊝⊜

12 Nov 2026, 14:19 UTC370 views27 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Taehyung on weverse💜🐻 🐻: It’s chilly out. Let's dress warm ⌜ @bts_army_queen ⌟

❤23🍾3😍1

Signed ⊙⊝⊜

12 Nov 2026, 14:09 UTC283 views22 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#taehyung instagram post💜🐻 This is just how I live ⌜ @bts_army_queen ⌟

❤14🥰7😍1

Signed ⊙⊝⊜

11 Nov 2026, 17:58 UTC21 viewsread 11 November 2026

🎁 ∿ ​​​​𝘞𝘦'𝘳𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘚𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘱 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘵 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘭𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘛𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘮 💢 ꒦꒷🛎 𝘓𝘪𝘯𝘬𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘣𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘦 𝘢𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘦𝘸 𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘴⏳ ─── ⋆🌟⋆ 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐕𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐝 ─── ▶️ 💜 : BTS Official ▶️ 🎻 : TXT Official ▶️ 🪢 : Blackpink Official ▶️ 🔖 : IU Official ▶️ 🧧 : Enhypen Official ▶️ 🌐 : SKZ Official ▶️ 🩶 : NCT Official ───── ⋆🎨⋆ 𝐀𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐜 𝐇𝐮𝐛 ───── ▶️ 🎨 : Creative Spark ▶️ ✈️ : Travel Dreams ▶️ ☕ : Cozy Corner Cafe ▶️ 🧩 : Daily Mindset Hab…

Signed ㅤ🍓ᰥㅤׅ 𝒻ׅ֩ᰰ𝒾𝓈᷼ℴㅤׄ 🥛◌ㅤ

Showing the 12 most recent of 338 posts we hold for @bts_army_queen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 10 posts on @bts_army_queen as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
13 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
17 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3

Polls

The 6 most recent of 38 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTCAnonymous Poll39 voters

Choose our next BTS games

  1. 🎬 MV Detective21%
  2. 🎭 Who Said It?54%
  3. 🔎 Missing Word23%
  4. 🔐 BTS Password13%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTCAnonymous Poll40 voters

BTS Missing Word Quiz...."Smooth like __like a criminal undercover."

  1. Honey0%
  2. Sugar3%

Shares as published, totalling 3%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTCAnonymous Poll35 voters

Thank you for participation ...Hope you guys enjoyed

  1. No0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTCAnonymous Poll44 voters

Which song is the hidden track on Love Yourself: Her?

  1. Go Go11%
  2. Best of Me14%
  3. DNA11%
  4. Sea70%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTCAnonymous Poll52 voters

Who is known as the “WWH” of BTS?

  1. Jungkook6%
  2. Jin94%
  3. Taehyung4%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTCAnonymous Poll54 voters

Which member's stage name is V?

  1. Kim Seokjin0%
  2. Park Jimin0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 338 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

⟭⟬ BTS UPDATES ⟭⟬
@BTS_armysssss · 48,864
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
BTS Daily Update⁷⟭⟬
@ForArmysID · 35,289
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
BTS PAID CONTENTS AND UPDATES ENG SUB
@thv_Ot7 · 35,328
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
JUNGKOOK | BANGTAN | BTS
@Bangtan_JUNGKOOK · 19,014
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 October 2026
BTS Video 💜
@runbtssubindo · 31,769
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 5 September 2026
🇰🇷 Korean Language | 한국 🇰🇷
@korean_language_kpop_dorama · 61,807
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“♡BTS UPDATES & EDITS♡” (@bts_army_queen), 16,096 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bts_army_queen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.