Channel
@btdpodslushano
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
629subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003710996713 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @btdpodslushano |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/btdpodslushano |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 629 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 623 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 621 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (24 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,429 |
| Reactions total | 384 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
384 reactions across 12 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5458442716369132280 | 241 | 62.8% | |
| custom 5456208817979137285 | 143 | 37.2% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 384reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❤️ 🔡 ♥️elcom to ⌨️ ⋮ 🥹┆ 🩸🩸🩸 🩸🅰️🩸🅰️ 🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫 ﾒ 🥹🤩 ៸ᯓ ⋮ ☺️ 🥹 ｡ ° ‧🩸 𝄞 🌟🌟 🔹десь ты найдешь … 👉 👉 🌟 𓄧 ⌞🤩🤩⌝ 🟣уча контента по⚰⚰⚰⚰⚰ арты, анимации, мемы и другое🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 нави- 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 гация 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ꒦︶꒷꒦︶ CONFESSION ✦─ ⋆⋅☆⋅⋆
custom 54584427163691322807custom 54562088179791372853
Добрый вечер, я бы хотела попросить помощи у подслушки в желании осветить ситуацию в фандоме, связанную с недобросовестным поведением по отношению к двум художницам. Для ознакомления с ситуацией прикрепляю (СТАТЬЮ) с объяснением и отдельно прикрепляю видео для контекста, из-за чего вообще пошёл конфликт. 1 видео "Mneninado" 2 видео "Lina Hana" Данный слив не является призывом к травле, угрозам, ненависти и т. д. Да…
custom 545620881797913728528
что в итоге с @BTDTPOFEEE ? С организатором, с художниками,с заказчиками?Может что-то новое появилось? Конечно не являюсь заказчиком или кем-то иным, но заинтересован в этом.Пробовали кинуть в ПВЗ (подслушано в зинодельне) об этом? #тейк / @btdpodslushano
custom 545844271636913228018
Я ни в коем случае не осуждаю Гатобоб за ее решение практически полностью покинуть социальные сети и вести только сайт и Патреон, но вам не кажется, что какие-нибудь детали и новости из личной жизни можно было бы всё таки публиковать в каком-нибудь блоге, пусть и закрытом (где принимались бы заявки людей 18+ лет), а не на самом Патреоне, что больше предназначен для публикации творческого контента? Это могло бы лучше …
custom 545620881797913728536custom 545844271636913228014
Завидуйте, я лично знакома с Женей Гоффардом и Сеней, они оба ахуеннейшие чуваки ирл, очень добри и дружелюбные, с ними было очень весело!! Жаль сейчас общаемся редко( Я по ним скучаю оооч. #тейк / @btdpodslushano
custom 545620881797913728544custom 545844271636913228012
дальше отвечать не стала просто уже сил не хватило оправдываться да и не считаю нужным если честно мне кажется достаточно вежливо чтобы не выносить все на публику и выставлять меня нехорошей #тейк / @btdpodslushano
custom 545844271636913228026custom 54562088179791372856
привет это сеня клянусь я так и знала что про это напишут в подслушку неприятно но окэй ! за те пару часов что я была занята на шестой слот нашлось насколько желающих, но решать такое в одиночку не хотелось совершенно тем более я впервые организовывала коллаб и сильно переживала с вилкой я общалась максимально вежливо и естественно не пыталась как-то задеть! переписку с ней выкладываю следующим тейком #тейк / @btdpo…
custom 545844271636913228024custom 54562088179791372856
По поводу недавнего коллаба у Сени… Дело в том, что начался кастинг на последний слот. Честно скажу, мне больно и обидно. Не было никакого предупреждения о том, что будет выбор лучшей работы. Оправдывать это тем, что организатор не успел написать тому, кто первым занял слот звучит глупо. И не нужно говорить, что человек, который организовал коллаб, вправе выставлять свои правила потому как их не было изначально в по…
custom 545844271636913228021custom 54562088179791372857
Всем привет! На связи Сникерс! я по вам очень скучала и хотела спросить как вообще в фд дела? Я очень по всем скучала! хочу немного позитивный тейк. 🤎 #тейк / @btdpodslushano
custom 545844271636913228013custom 54562088179791372856
Кстати вот ещё про стрейда от Ани орловой #тейк / @btdpodslushano
custom 545844271636913228034custom 54562088179791372851
У меня вопрос. Часто натыкаюсь на художников в фандоме, что устраивают какие-то ивенты или лотереи, а потом не отдают призы под предлогом:"Ну ты же не платил". Извините, а почему это считается нормой? Это же не набор на реквесты. Это интерактив с подписчиками! Подписчики свою часть договора выполнили. Победили. Ждут приз. А в итоге им ни приза, ни уважения. Так ещё этих же подписчиков потом может начать газлайтить х…
custom 545844271636913228022
Мне смешно с доебов людей на чужих осок, как будто в игре не дохуя концовок где гг помирает от слабости 😂 #тейк / @btdpodslushano
custom 545844271636913228050custom 54562088179791372856
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @btdpodslushano. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 56,426 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“бтд подслушка” (@btdpodslushano), 629 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/btdpodslushano.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.