Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

♬⋆.˚ @bstalker ♬⋆.˚

@bstalker

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

389subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003686173605
TypeChannel
Username@bstalker
Descriptionwhere every collection rests like a quiet indulgence @bstalkerr_bot requires inbox — chosen gently, and held with intention .. 🐾 🐈‍⬛⊹
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/bstalker

Growth

38914 Aug 2026, 06:21 — 389 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 06:31 — 389 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 06:2114 Aug 2026, 06:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 388–390 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 06:31389no change
14 Aug 2026, 06:21389first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.6%
avg views ÷ 389 subscribers
Avg views / post
193
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (9 June 20269 August 2026)
Views total386
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

194 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52537083384027121105025.8%
custom 52539457298350983734925.3%
custom 52539563384043156964824.7%
custom 52536605568915445744724.2%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 194reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bstalker. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC192 viewsread 14 August 2026

jajan yuk, username ku still available to nego yah jadi ndak usah malu" klo mau tanya ke bot ♡

20 Jun 2026, 03:41 UTC≈1,410 views38 reactions7 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

it's tight in the backseat, and all i am aware of is the litter potter of the rain that's hitting the roof of the car ₍^. .^₎⟆ rose-tinted verses weaving a delicate symphony of tender echoes. ಄ ⋆🐾° — contact order usn ಄ ⋆🐾° — terms & condition ಄ ⋆🐾° — catalog username ಄ ⋆🐾° — soldout username lune drifts through distant reveries like sacred memories of affection gentle devotion releasing soft butterfli

custom 525370833840271211010custom 525394572983509837310custom 52536605568915445749custom 52539563384043156969

20 Jun 2026, 03:39 UTC≈1,310 views40 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

rose-tinted verses weaving a delicate symphony of tender echoes. ⋆🐾° : username of animanga ⋆🐾° : username of games ⋆🐾° : username of manhwa ⋆🐾° : username of others  lune drifts through distant reveries like sacred memories of affection gentle devotion releasing soft butterflies into starry gardens warm fate of the beloved transforming every pulse into a slow melody.

custom 525366055689154457410custom 525370833840271211010custom 525394572983509837310custom 525395633840431569610

20 Jun 2026, 03:33 UTC981 viewsread 14 August 2026

📝 ..♡ ask anything ! 👤 hi kak bisikin @ gihtae dongg plc :c 👤 Bisikin @ skylaor nya dong 👤 kakak… bisikin kuwze.. makasiu banyak huhu 👤 naksir bgt sm mizi nya, bisikin dong kak 🥺💞💞 👤 Apa boleh bisikin yorvu.. 👤 haaai kak Endo ufs ga? 🥹 👤 yoru nya apakah ufs >< 👤 Kakak bisikin yroshiki nya donggg 👤 hayii kaa, may i know how much is moyriarty? thanks before 👤 Kak bisikin togamej pls 😆 👤 bisikin mitsurwi nya

20 Jun 2026, 03:33 UTC734 views28 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

(..&) dotted paths guide you through tiny notes &. soft keepsakes each corner holds a quiet hush of sweetness, carefully placed like white ink resting on paper—slow, light, and intentional. 。𖦹°‧ username of others 。𖦹°‧ every name sits like a quiet dot in between silence &. thought—not loud, not demanding, just existing softly where time feels thinner.

custom 52536605568915445747custom 52537083384027121107custom 52539457298350983737custom 52539563384043156967

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bstalker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 610,790 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“♬⋆.˚ @bstalker ♬⋆.˚” (@bstalker), 389 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bstalker.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.