Channel
@brynskikh_m
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
24subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002950011920 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @brynskikh_m |
| Description | Всякие попизделки про Digital-маркетинг и корпоративную жизнь |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/brynskikh_m |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 24 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 24 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 16 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (16 December 2025 – 20 July 2026) |
| Views total | 98 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
19 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 8 | 42.1% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 21.1% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 15.8% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 15.8% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2025 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Интересно, меня одного раздражает вот эта фраза, которую некоторые особы пишут в комментариях "А МЫ НА "ТЫ" НЕ ПЕРЕХОДИЛИ". Кто так пишет — самый худший архетип пользователя в интернете. Отврат и ужас. Токсичность в перемешку с пафосом ✨✨✨ ФУ!
Встретилось в сети интернет😁 Обещают 3000 рублей за 4 часа игры. Может это чья-то работа мечты? Инфа тут ➡️ Ссылка
Победитель в номинации "нейминг года" 🤣🤣
Ну чё, друзья, будете в Max переходить?)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1👍1👎1
Блин нас спалили😢
👎2❤1🤣1
Представьте, что в вашем доме осталось одно место для магазина. Какой бы предпочли? (при условии что ни того ни другого ещё нет)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👎1
Жизненно?🤷♀️
👎1🤣1😢1
Пишет мне предприниматель: вы с какого числа входите в рабочий режим? Я, который с 5:00 3 января уже выполняет задачи и сегодня в воскресение: 🗿🗿🗿
👎1🤣1
🔥 Авито: что изменилось в 2025? А вы знали, что на Авито теперь можно найти..... врача❗️ В мае 2025 платформа запустила раздел "Здоровье" — как ответ на образовавшийся спрос. Мне, кстати, всегда казалось странным, что эта рубрика отсутствует, при всей популярности ниши. ⁉️Почему это случилось? Вот что выяснили аналитики из Авито: 📊более 11,3 млн пользователей ежемесячно искали услуги в сфере здоровья и красоты; 📊 …
👎1
🌸🌸Red Bull 🌸🌸 Отработка стереотипов и возражений о продукте 👋 Во-первых, всем привет и поздравление с наступившим НГ и т.д. и т.п. Что-то я совсем залип в шортсах Red Bull на YouTube.... И, кстати, отметил одну фишку, которую раньше не замечал Но сперва зададимся вопросом, а в чём проблема рекламы энергетиков? У них дурная слава, которая особенно часто исходит от спортсменов и ЗОЖ‑ников: 💬Это не для атлетов! 💬Отра…
👎1
И вот опять авито щимит нас🤷♀️ Сначала интеграция с Битриксом платная. Теперь API. Вывод по всем этим изменениям простой: без тарифа теперь попросту непросуществуешь. Даже если без тарифа у вас есть клиенты с авито, то теперь придётся платить даже за базовые инструменты. Ну, хотя бы тарифы не дорожают. Тьфу тьфу
👆Занимательная аналитика от Яндекса. Есть о чём подумать 🧐
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @brynskikh_m. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ну чё, друзья, будете в Max переходить?)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Представьте, что в вашем доме осталось одно место для магазина. Какой бы предпочли? (при условии что ни того ни другого ещё нет)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2025 to 20 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Неадекват в отделе маркетинга” (@brynskikh_m), 24 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brynskikh_m.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.