Channel
@brusser_lab
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
813subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001812860225 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @brusser_lab |
| Description | инспириед бай ворк ин прогресс автор: мультидисциплинарный дизайнер @lia_brusser |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/brusser_lab |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 813 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 813 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 9 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
94 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5316559073041248682 | 46 | 48.9% | |
| custom 5318865749652055445 | 19 | 20.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 14.9% | |
| custom 5317031132896729357 | 7 | 7.45% | |
| custom 5319251549384385385 | 6 | 6.38% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 2.13% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Типографика студентов курса Лёши Пушкарёва, как причина любить дизайн Тут мой зин, который на прошлой неделе уехал на выставку в Москву (путешественник)
custom 53165590730412486829custom 53188657496520554454
Друзья, минутка хороших новостей в наше нестабильное время. Недавно ко мне обратились из mish с предложением работы, а я уже арт-директор в Family. Поэтому передаю контакт — вдруг это ваш шанс) 🤩 Обязанности: Классический арт-дирекшн 🤩 Требования: Опыт арт-дирекшна от 3 лет Вкус, навыки в брендинге и графическом дизайне, системное мышление, умение отстаивать идеи и вдохновлять команду Если узнали себя — бегите в…
custom 53165590730412486829
Не пишите, это была лимитка, всего 20 шт 😌 Ближайший дроп аксессуаров осенью ’26
custom 53165590730412486826
ультра свэговые банданы для самых нишевых колхозниц и доярок сделали с Лией @lia_brusser пишите ей если хотите щеголять в такой под испепеляющим ядерным московским и питерским солнцем и не получить солнечный удар 🥊
custom 531655907304124868211
⭐️ Щёлочь x Выставка «В единственном экземпляре» в Севкабеле 💻 Что будет? В единственном экземпляре» — это выставка о процессе, который невозможно воспроизвести. Важен не результат, а способ его появления: подвижный и нетиражируемый. Эти работы не повторить, даже если точно следовать инструкции. Проект объединяет выставочное пространство, лекторий и практический воркшоп, посвященные авторскому дизайну. Три дня …
custom 53192515493843853856custom 53188657496520554451
Лия, Калла [Zantedeschia] Воплощение чистоты линии и благородной сдержанности. Её строгая форма и лаконичный силуэт создают ощущение порядка и вкуса. Этот цветок ассоциируется с уважением, элегантностью и внутренним достоинством. с каждой задачей ты справляешься элегантно, без лишней суеты и декоративного шума. Не сыпешься при правках и держишь свою линию. Очень приятно наблюдать за твоим профессиональным ростом. …
custom 531655907304124868210custom 53170311328967293577
Вот такой цветок мне подарили на работе. Вы только посмотрите на эту весеннюю красоту
мое восхищение перед людьми, которые работают с визуальной частью нашей с вами окружающей жизни, не знает пределов в прошлую пятницу я побывала на открытии выставки плакатов и зинов «В единственном экземпляре» Лия, Ася и вся команда, спасибо вам, чудесные 🤍 вы как глоток свежего воздуха! Ксении Подлипенцевой спасибо за интересную лекцию. за упоминание Йозефа Бойса, отдельное мое. теперь хочу больше узнать про гута…
custom 531886574965205544510
Ура, вот они — фотографии ✨ Это все случилось только потому, что вы пришли. Ловите первые ссылки на диски от фотографов — ищите себя, друзей и просто невероятно красивых людей и талантливые работы: ИВАН ЕФРЕМОВ ВОВА АЛЕКСАНДРОВ НИКИТА КОНУБРИКОВ АННА Отдельное спасибо фотографам, что увидели те детальки, которых не успели разглядеть мы — @imagesform // @vova_aleksandrov // @konubr // @pooop_pooo
❤🔥14custom 53188657496520554454🔥2custom 53165590730412486821
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @brusser_lab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,117,312 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@brusser_lab named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“brusser's — láb” (@brusser_lab), 813 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brusser_lab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.