Channel
@bruno_wolters
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
642subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001356997559 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bruno_wolters |
| Created | 1 August 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bruno_wolters |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 642 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 644 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 644 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (31 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,381 |
| Reactions total | 118 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
118 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 73 | 61.9% | |
| 🤬 | 11 | 9.32% | |
| 👎 | 10 | 8.47% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 6.78% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 5.08% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 4.24% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 4.24% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Spaßfaktor: Es sollte niemanden überraschen, dass Auftritte rechter Politiker regelmäßig zu Medienspektakeln werden und entsprechend viel Aufmerksamkeit erhalten. Bereits im Jahr 2000 wurde ein Auftritt Jörg Haiders bei n-tv zum Quotenschlager. Und natürlich jammerten damals – genauso wie heute nach Höckes Auftritt bei Berndt – die Politiker der Kartellparteien über die mediale Bühne, die ihren politischen Gegnern ge…
👍4
🇩🇪 Ein Video vom „Tag der deutschen Jugend“ in Schwerin sorgt für Diskussionen über den Auftritt der „Generation Deutschland“ Mike Gutsing erklärt, warum für ihn nicht der Vorfall selbst, sondern die Identitätskrise der AfD-Jugend das eigentliche Problem ist. Link zum Artikel: https://www.freilich-magazin.com/politik/die-sackgasse-der-generation-deutschland
👍7🔥2👎1
📚 Ausgerechnet bei der AfD-nahen Desiderius-Erasmus-Stiftung wird Jan Fleischhauer demnächst sein neues Buch vorstellen Dabei hatte er die Partei in der Vergangenheit scharf attackiert und sogar erklärt, ein AfD-Verbot wäre ihm „auch recht“. Link zum Artikel: https://www.freilich-magazin.com/politik/afd-nahe-stiftung-laedt-scharfen-afd-kritiker-jan-fleischhauer-ein
👎7🔥3
Ich habe jetzt die 900-seitige Erhard-Biografie von Hentschel durch. Die kann ich nur empfehlen. Vor allem ereignis- und diplomatiegeschichtlich kann man mitnehmen, dass die letzten Jahre in einigen Fällen quasi die 60er Jahre von damals waren. Ein Beispiel: "Der erste Brief übersetzte gleichsam Alarmrufe ins Deutsche, die letzthin in Frankreich Furore gemacht hatten. Jene Alarmrufe galten der Feststellung, daß tech…
👍5
📖 20 Prozent Rabatt, drei Magazine und über 250 Seiten Analysen Mit der Sommeraktion lohnt sich ein FREILICH-Abonnement jetzt besonders. Nur bis zum 17. August gibt es das Jahresabo vergünstigt und inklusive eines exklusiven Dossiers für neue Abonnenten. Link zum Artikel: https://www.freilich-magazin.com/blog/sommeraktion-20-prozent-rabatt-auf-das-freilich-abo
❤2👎1
🇵🇱 War es ein würdiges Gedenken oder eine kalkulierte Provokation? Eine umstrittene Aktion der polnischen Partei Nowa Nadzieja vor dem Brandenburger Tor in Berlin sorgte am Wochenende für scharfe Kritik. Link zum Artikel: https://www.freilich-magazin.com/politik/mit-bengalos-und-transparenten-polnische-afd-partnerpartei-provoziert-mit-aktion-vor-brandenburger-tor
🤬11
Der Artikel über das Freilich Magazin im neuen DÖW-Rechtsextremismus-Handbuch ist eigentlich ziemlich unspektakulär, oder? Aber immerhin wird gegendert. Natürlich sind auch Fehlinformationen vorhanden, aber das gehört bei Rechtsextremismusexperten eben dazu.
😁5
Zu Spanien gibt es viele falsche Informationen. Hier muss man auch mal die Kirche im Dorf lassen, weil einiges durcheinandergebracht wird. Zunächst einmal ist es richtig, dass der linke Ministerpräsident Sánchez potenziell rund einer Million Migranten in Spanien einen neuen Aufenthaltstitel ermöglicht hat. Dieser muss allerdings erst beantragt werden. Bis zum Fristende gab es rund 1,2 Millionen Anträge. Das muss ma…
👍9
Ein schönes Beispiel für das enorme Ungleichgewicht, mit dem rechte Medien im Vergleich zu den etablierten Medien konfrontiert sind. Letztere werden mit Millionenbeträgen staatlich gefördert, obwohl sie – gemessen an diesen Summen – oft nur eine vergleichsweise geringe Leserschaft erreichen. Wir bei FREILICH verzeichnen in guten Monaten laut unserem bewusst datenschutzsensibel und nüchtern arbeitenden Statistik-Too…
👍8
[Polnischer Nationalistenaufmarsch in Berlin] Der rechtspolnische PR-Slop-Tourismus nach Berlin durch die Konfederacja, konkret ausgerechnet durch die AfD-Partnerpartei Nowa Nadzieja, wird langsam peinlich. 1. Man macht sowas nicht, schon gar nicht wiederholt. Das ist kein Stil; das ist Ressentiment-Kultivierung. 2. Man müsste es, wenn überhaupt, in Moskau tun, denn die Rote Armee hätte damals problemlos über die …
💯6❤5
Islamkritik kann eine Folie der politischen Kommunikation sein, sie sollte jedoch weder programmatischen noch inhaltlichen Charakter annehmen. Wenn überhaupt, dann sollte sie sich gegen eine „Islamisierung” Europas richten und nicht gegen den Islam als solchen. Die Gefahr einer Anti-Dschihad- oder allgemeinen Islamkritik besteht nämlich darin, in eine Pfadabhängigkeit zu geraten und sich plötzlich um vermeintliche Bü…
👍14❤1
Die europäische Rechte muss sich entscheiden. Folgt sie weiterhin der Logik eines vermeintlichen „Kampfs der Zivilisationen“, gemeinsam mit den USA und Israel als Teil des „Westens“, verbunden mit einer Anti-Dschihad-Linie und der Unterstützung außereuropäischer Kriege im Nahen Osten, in Afrika und in Asien? Oder versteht sie sich als eigenständiger europäischer Block, der seine außenpolitischen Interessen aus natio…
👍12
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @bruno_wolters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 100,175 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bruno Wolters” (@bruno_wolters), 642 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bruno_wolters.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.