t.me/anonimnyye_voprosy_bot?start=6gnijb напишите чет
Signed гертаа

Channel
@bruhhnj
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
85subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001922228944 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bruhhnj |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bruhhnj |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 85 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 87 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 87 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
75 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5334624981093464459 | 29 | 38.7% | |
| custom 5334903385168560266 | 12 | 16.0% | |
| custom 5334964330754488154 | 12 | 16.0% | |
| custom 5195462525965054250 | 8 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5345777769915620573 | 4 | 5.33% | |
| custom 5445390976476523126 | 4 | 5.33% | |
| custom 5334692382015241450 | 3 | 4.00% | |
| custom 5309861299176352330 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| custom 5276229695203979385 | 1 | 1.33% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2024 to 18 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
t.me/anonimnyye_voprosy_bot?start=6gnijb напишите чет
Signed гертаа
есть кто разбирается в компах?
Signed гертаа
💕
custom 51954625259650542508custom 53457777699156205734custom 54453909764765231264
Signed 叶歆
сидит тут а петь не вышел🤙
custom 53346249810934644594
Signed 叶歆
руслан пидор
custom 53346249810934644594
Signed 叶歆
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53349033851685602664
Signed 叶歆
Video message, posted without a caption
Signed 叶歆
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53346249810934644596custom 53349643307544881542
Signed 叶歆
заходите в приватку мою
Signed 叶歆
https://t.me/+9TA3ivG93FU3ODli
Signed 叶歆
💝
custom 533462498109346445910custom 53349643307544881549custom 53349033851685602668custom 53098612991763523302custom 52762296952039793851
Signed 叶歆
он врубил гламур
Signed 叶歆
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bruhhnj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“sour candy” (@bruhhnj), 85 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bruhhnj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.