🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победители: 1. A (@AzaBake) 2. Bulka (@bulka_4) ✔️Проверить результаты
👾5custom 53327992506254970413

Channel
@brozzilla1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
288subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002671368115 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @brozzilla1 |
| Description | ЛИМИТИРОВАННЫЙ ДРОП ФУТБОЛОК BIG LOVE / BIG TRAFF / BIG DICK — уже в продаже! Залетай в наш шоп и забирай футболку 👇🏻 https://brozzilla.shop/ По всем вопросам и восхищениям к менеджеру: @brozzilla_manager |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/brozzilla1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 288 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 288 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 4 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
187 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5332799250625497041 | 87 | 46.5% | |
| custom 5406599497578980623 | 36 | 19.3% | |
| 👾 | 32 | 17.1% | |
| custom 5312359316580216113 | 21 | 11.2% | |
| custom 5397811229987194468 | 11 | 5.88% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 187reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2026 to 3 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победители: 1. A (@AzaBake) 2. Bulka (@bulka_4) ✔️Проверить результаты
👾5custom 53327992506254970413
🔥 Розыгрыш двух футболок BIG DICK IS BACK IN GAMBLING В арбитраже всё просто: чем больше льёшь — тем длиннее твой dick Поэтому мы сделали лимитированный дроп с уникальным дизайном, где внушительный «размер» зашит в деталях — для тех, кто больше не собирается это скрывать. Это не просто мерч — это маркер уровня. Уровня, который видно невооруженным взглядом. Если это про тебя — ты знаешь, что делать ⬇️ 1. Подпишись…
👾6custom 53123593165802161135custom 53327992506254970415custom 54065994975789806232
С Днём всех влюбленных! ❤️ Любовь — это про эмоции, про вайб и про моменты, которые хочется пересматривать снова и снова. BIG LOVE / BIG TRAFF / BIG DICK — идеальный подарок своей половинке для создания именно таких моментов 🔥 Залетай в шоп и забирай топовый мерч из лимитированной коллекции для того, с кем у тебя максимальный мэтч
custom 53327992506254970413
Big dick energy в одной футболке. Надел — и всё вокруг поняли, кто здесь главный 😏 Забирай лимитку прямо сейчас или продолжай оставаться фоном 💀
custom 533279925062549704110custom 53978112299871944685custom 53123593165802161133
В мерче «BIG LOVE» вайб на миллион, даже когда всё остальное на нуле ❤️🔥 Заходи в шоп прямо сейчас, забирай футболочку и поднимай себе любимому настроение
custom 533279925062549704115custom 54065994975789806238custom 53123593165802161137
Хватит дарить ему банальщину на праздники 🛑 Мы выбрали идеальный подарок для него за тебя — мерч «BIG LOVE / BIG TRAFF / BIG DICK» Переходи на сайт и забирай лимитку, чтобы реально порадовать любимого 😏
custom 533279925062549704110👾9custom 54065994975789806239
Страх №1 на 14 февраля: не успеть приобрести лимитированный BIG LOVE / BIG TRAFF / BIG D… 🍆 Признай, розы, шоколадки и мишки уже не конвертят. Всех достали скучные «знаки внимания». Пора дарить реальные эмоции! BIG LOVE / BIG TRAFF / BIG DICK — это не просто футболка, а прямое заявление: у меня много трафа, и размер имеет значение 😏 Твой партнёр точно скажет: «Вау, какой большой потенциал!». Поэтому скорее залетай…
custom 533279925062549704111
Она сделала ему правильный подарок на 14 февраля 😏🍆 А ты? Всё ещё выбираешь? Заходи в шоп, пока не поздно
custom 540659949757898062311custom 53327992506254970417👾6
❤️🔥 Love is… Любовь на языке igaming — это когда ты листаешь карусель, узнаёшь себя и отправляешь своей второй половинке ➡️ А ещё это наша лимитированная коллекция футболок: всего 25 штук, изготовленных специально ко Дню всех влюбленных. Успей забрать эксклюзивный мерч для себя и своего соулмейта 🫂
custom 533279925062549704112👾6custom 53978112299871944686
BIG LOVE / BIG TRAFF / BIG D… — лимитированный дроп 😱🔥 Мы устали тянуть и говорить намёками. Пора раскрыть главный секрет арбитража: Чем больше трафа — тем длиннее dick, и пришло время заявить об этом на весь мир! Запускаем дерзкую коллекцию мерча — BIG LOVE / BIG TRAFF / BIG DICK. Теперь твой размер в арбитраже виден всем, а заливать много трафика — не только круто, но и сексуально! Залетай в наш шоп и успей забр…
custom 533279925062549704111custom 53123593165802161136custom 54065994975789806236
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @brozzilla1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 414,596 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@brozzilla1 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BROZZILLA” (@brozzilla1), 288 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brozzilla1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.