Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Broxie Updates

Channel

Broxie Updates

@broxieNFT_news

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

178subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001657471845
TypeChannel
Username@broxieNFT_news
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 19 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/broxieNFT_news

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

178181179.57 August 2026 — 181 subscribers7 August 2026 — 181 subscribers14 August 2026 — 179 subscribers21 August 2026 — 178 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 14 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 178–181 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 11:05178-1
14 Aug 2026, 18:28179-2
7 Aug 2026, 08:17181no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:27181first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

182 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4323.6%
❤3619.8%
😁3418.7%
🔥1910.4%
🤣116.04%
⚡63.30%
🆒63.30%
😎63.30%
🥴52.75%
👀31.65%
🥰31.65%
🌚21.10%
🎉21.10%
🐳21.10%
👎21.10%
🍌10.549%
🫡10.549%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 182 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2023 to 11 April 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Apr 2024, 19:43 UTC454 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @everscale_newsPhoto

🇷🇸 EverPoint 2024: You’re invited! Mark your calendars for an unforgettable gathering of Everscale enthusiasts from around the world! This year, we're delighted to host the event in the vibrant city of Belgrade, Serbia! 📅 Save the Date: May 7-8, 2024 Be part of a special two-day celebration filled with insightful discussions, interactive presentations, and networking opportunities. Connect with fellow Everscalers…

❤7👍4🎉2👎2🐳1🥴1😁1

3 Aug 2023, 11:04 UTC≈1,010 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

What was the largest sale in NFT history? Any ideas? We’ll give you a little hint: it wasn’t a Broxie (yet) 😉 On March 11, 2021, crypto artist Beeple sold his “EVERYDAYS: THE FIRST 5000 DAYS” at Christie’s for a staggering $69.3 million. That’s over 20 times as much as the biggest BAYC sale! The buyer was Metapurse NFT founder MetaKovan, who paid 42,329 ETH for the artwork 🤯 It was a big day for crypto: the first…

⚡3

8 Jul 2023, 18:40 UTC781 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🖼️ Explore Broxie attributes on Tokstock Sup, Broxies? Ever wondered how rare a Broxie’s attributes are? Finding out before you buy is as easy as catching an armadillo (and that’s easy if you know how – trust us!) Head to Tokstock, click on any Broxie, and below the image you’ll see all those gorgeous attributes 🤩 In the top right corner of each attribute box is a rarity percentage – the lower the percentage, the…

⚡2👍1🔥1

21 Jun 2023, 10:25 UTC631 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Thank you Broxie Club! Broxie Club, a dedicated group of Broxie enthusiasts, has replenished the 1,221 NFT contracts of all Broxie holders with 1 EVER each, ensuring their security for at least 3 years — a remarkable contribution to all holders! 🤩 An NFT is a smart contract and needs a certain balance to be viable. The club sees that holders are not keen on this fact and has taken the initiative to protect their as…

❤9👍6🥰2

7 Jun 2023, 20:35 UTC529 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Hey, Broxie fam! We have a question for you to get your creative juices flowing! 💫 We're curious: which real-life celebrity does this Broxie look like? 🎭 Share your thoughts below: @BroxieNFT_News

🌚1🥰1

16 May 2023, 18:46 UTC572 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Did you know that holding at least one Broxie NFT in your connected account means you don't need to pay a marketplace fee when buying an NFT on Tokstock through an offer? ✨ Let's say you and an account without a Broxie both offer to buy an NFT for an equal amount of EVER. It makes more sense for the seller to accept your offer because they will get 100% of the sale price instead of 98% from the account without a Bro…

❤8👍3🥴3🆒3

12 May 2023, 19:11 UTC442 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

7 internship applications sent in 🔥 We are now reviewing your applications in detail and will get back to everyone later. We appreciate your desire to contribute to the network 😌❤️ @BroxieNFT_News

🔥8❤1👍1

4 May 2023, 13:39 UTC374 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

To reserve your place at the conference and learn more, visit the official site 👉 everpoint.io @BroxieNFT_News

👍1

3 May 2023, 14:34 UTC339 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

3 DAYS LEFT UNTIL EVERPOINT 2023! 🥰 Here are the panel discussion topics for the conference: ⚡️ "The Great Tokenization: Vision of an On-Chain Universe" ⚡️ "Exploring Asia's Potential as the Next Crypto Hub: Obstacles and Opportunities" ⚡️ "The Future of Blockchain: The Road to Onboard a Billion Users" ⚡️ "Venom & Everscale: Synergizing the Future of Decentralized Networking (Alliance) 2022-2026" To reserve your p…

⚡1❤1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @broxieNFT_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Broxie Updates” (@broxieNFT_news), 178 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/broxieNFT_news.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.