Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Бритва kooal'a

Channel

Бритва kooal'a

@britvakooala

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

178subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002398966277
TypeChannel
Username@britvakooala
DescriptionВсё что было и будет опубликовано в данном канале не является финансовой рекомендацией, повторяйте за мной на свой страх и риск Владелец - @kooal111 Менеджер по рекламе - @notkooal
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/britvakooala

Growth

1788 Aug 2026, 09:31 — 178 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 13:16 — 178 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:318 Aug 2026, 13:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 177–179 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 13:16178no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:31178first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
142.6%
avg views ÷ 178 subscribers
Avg views / post
254
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
22.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held19 (9 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total3,807
Reactions total467
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
470
Videos
9
Links
226

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

477 reactions across 10 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6413.4%
👍6313.2%
❤‍🔥5411.3%
🔥4810.1%
🤩4810.1%
🥰4810.1%
😍479.85%
🎉469.64%
💯459.43%
😁81.68%
😨30.629%
👀20.419%
🤡10.21%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 477reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @britvakooala. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC75 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

raven shift seven wire stereo fold whisper runway vast nephew whisper gown ?? gram, кто успеет, подарок для вас

5 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC498 views440 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

gm. че ищем надежный бот? времени нет. торгуйте по моей рефке на тон, объемы скоро льются, это буллиш. берем DTrade. он топ уже 2 года, самый стабильный и быстрый на тон. есть аналоги типа redotrade, но про их команду инфы мало, лучше не рисковать. мой баланс только в DTrade — там diamond hands. redotrade использую только для массовых лимиток на кучу кошельков.

👍56❤‍🔥5448🤩48🥰47😍47🎉46🔥46

5 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC98 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

NDA ALFA PRIVATE IS WORKING😙 In November 2026…

2👀2

4 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC281 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

новый токен с наративом стикеров запущенный на мередиане, который они уже подсветили в канале. в прошлый раз это был тони, который с 30к улетел до ляма. думайте, новая альфочка от мрдн https://t.me/dtrade?start=mmm_EQA0VgdQqp2ygndisR1uXoVNMTH8gCOkWndP8RkTe_DRAGON

😨3

31 Jul 2026, 12:26 UTC468 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Подскажите, как пополнить баланс, чтобы купить подарки?

😁4👍1

29 Jul 2026, 16:19 UTC219 viewsread 8 August 2026

Это просто отдельная история Хотелось бы очень верить, что рост будет 😔

29 Jul 2026, 11:08 UTC230 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я распродал тогда все свои токены по 90-50к и заработал 120 тон, а потом купил по 26к Через время я решил продать, чтобы не морочить себе голову и пойти решать алгоритмические задачи Как видите, токен просто восстал из пепла, а я теперь очень расстроен упущенными 160 тонами. Не знаю как доживу этот день до конца, но вероятно это будет очень обидный и скучный день 😔

29 Jul 2026, 07:45 UTC180 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Чуть больше 120 тон заработал, только на 10 входил Все, новость отработала, можно дальше отдыхать ребят

26 Jul 2026, 14:03 UTC200 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

2x уже в кошельке, и это еще не конец. чарт кричит pump, деги уже жмут green. gm, ngmi, wagmi!

6

25 Jul 2026, 16:47 UTC188 viewsread 8 August 2026

Рисует) https://tonviewer.com/EQAjumTXP6DryRMflNGjqDO2Dt2jxCAvrrASFuaipLSebxPd EQAi4Zk5ne5eNLukrzH3r0Qs0s56rrFP7Om_9-DKkEdzg-pw

24 Jul 2026, 16:41 UTC302 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Напомню, что рассылать массово токены можно через моего бота - TON MultiSender с нулевой комиссией. Я себе ничего не забираю, только комиссия блокчейна копеечная

👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @britvakooala. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 979,625 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бритва kooal'a” (@britvakooala), 178 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/britvakooala.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.