Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bright Star️️️️️️️️️️️️🔥🔥🔥

Channel

Bright Star️️️️️️️️️️️️🔥🔥🔥

@brightstarclub

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,280subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001895873037
TypeChannel
Username@brightstarclub
CreatedBetween 1 November 2022 and 31 August 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/brightstarclub

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,2761,2821,27918 August 2026 — 1,281 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,280 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,276 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,277 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,280 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,282 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,279 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,280 subscribers1,28018 August 202616 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 29 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,275–1,283 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 03:221,280+1
12 Sept 2026, 08:561,279-3
3 Sept 2026, 15:391,282+2
31 Aug 2026, 08:421,280+3
27 Aug 2026, 23:551,277+1
25 Aug 2026, 00:321,276-4
18 Aug 2026, 17:571,280-1
18 Aug 2026, 01:301,281first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 15 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 01s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

167 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7343.7%
🔥3722.2%
💯148.38%
🏆116.59%
🤩95.39%
😁63.59%
👍52.99%
👏52.99%
💘31.80%
😍21.20%
⚡10.599%
🥰10.599%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC332 views8 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Да, для нас эти сборы являются традиционными. Мы их посещаем, и там будет работать наш тренер. Мы стараемся везде посещать занятия с нашим тренером, чтобы не пропускать тренировки. 💪🏽

❤8

16 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC336 views2 reactionsread 18 August 2026

📨 Получено сообщение! ⁨Вы едите на сборы Каллиграфия тела?⁩

❤2

16 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC339 views7 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Большое спасибо! Нам очень приятно ❤️ Прогоны и правда заряжают!

❤3🏆2🔥2

16 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC339 views8 reactionsread 18 August 2026

📨 Получено сообщение! ⁨Потрясающие сборы! Супер-вдохновляющая и мотивирующая атмосфера♥️ Прогоны- особенная любовь 🔥⁩

💯5❤2🤩1

16 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC335 views6 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍3🔥2❤1

16 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC324 views13 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо за такие теплые и искренние слова! Мы очень старались для вас и будем стараться еще больше. Ждем всех на наших следующих сборах! 🥰💫🩷

❤5🤩4🔥3💘1

16 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC315 views13 reactionsread 18 August 2026

📨 Получено сообщение! ⁨Тренеры и чемпионы — это отдельная песня. Это не просто люди с регалиями, это фанатики своего дела. Но они не «ломали» детей, они вкладывали в них силу. С какой любовью они поправляли каждую линию, как они светились, когда видели прогресс! Спасибо им за терпение и за ту искру, которую они зажгли в глазах наших чад. Но самое главное — это дети. Господи, какие же они все красивые! И дело не во в…

🔥8🏆2💯2⚡1

16 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC304 views11 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Огромное спасибо! Ваши эмоции — лучшая награда. Впереди только самое крутое! ❤️🔥💃🏽

❤6💯3🏆2

16 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC309 views10 reactionsread 18 August 2026

📨 Получено сообщение! ⁨Очень понравились сборы: атмосфера, море полезной информации, крутые педагоги и бешеная энергия от всех танцоров! спасибо за такое мощное начало сезона❤️⁩

❤5💯4🤩1

16 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC314 views17 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥9😁4👍2🤩1🥰1

16 Aug 2026, 09:57 UTC305 views6 reactionsread 18 August 2026

📨 Получено сообщение! ⁨какая была самая любимая пара на сборах?⁩

🏆3❤1🤩1😍1

16 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC319 views7 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

Настолько продуктивно, что встать после них даже невозможно) 🤪😅

❤4😁2🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @brightstarclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Dark floor
@darkfloor · 25,650
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 13 September 2026
Вера Бонд 🖤
@vera_bond007 · 87,870
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 18 August 2026
Али, шали!
@ali_sha_li · 21,177
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 23 September 2026
жизнь ксюнка🙊
@ksunoook · 26,796
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bright Star️️️️️️️️️️️️🔥🔥🔥” (@brightstarclub), 1,280 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brightstarclub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.