Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
38 measurements spanning 66 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,051–24,367 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 38
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Oct 2026, 03:16
20,552
-222
8 Oct 2026, 19:17
20,774
-109
4 Oct 2026, 08:56
20,883
-294
25 Sept 2026, 21:56
21,177
-392
19 Sept 2026, 07:02
21,569
-82
16 Sept 2026, 23:19
21,651
-172
15 Sept 2026, 00:20
21,823
-49
13 Sept 2026, 11:16
21,872
-57
11 Sept 2026, 13:19
21,929
-138
8 Sept 2026, 21:38
22,067
-251
5 Sept 2026, 17:01
22,318
-42
3 Sept 2026, 20:17
22,360
-10
2 Sept 2026, 12:26
22,370
-33
1 Sept 2026, 13:53
22,403
-17
31 Aug 2026, 15:08
22,420
+24
30 Aug 2026, 11:54
22,396
-103
29 Aug 2026, 13:19
22,499
-66
28 Aug 2026, 13:42
22,565
-119
27 Aug 2026, 10:43
22,684
-67
26 Aug 2026, 11:36
22,751
first reading
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 39 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 55s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,331 reactions across 39 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,428
61.3%
🔥
265
11.4%
🤔
192
8.24%
👍
142
6.09%
👏
129
5.53%
😍
52
2.23%
❤🔥
47
2.02%
💯
24
1.03%
🥰
23
0.987%
😢
12
0.515%
🤩
11
0.472%
😱
6
0.257%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,331 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 39 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ali_sha_li. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Хорошие девочки злятся молча
И себя теряют тоже молча
— промолчала, когда партнёр обесценил то, что для тебя важно
— не попросила о помощи, потому что неудобно навязываться
— не сказала, чего хочешь в близости — ну как об этом вообще заговорить
— не показала ту себя, настоящую, на которую точно обратили бы внимание
Зато... осталась хорошей))
А потом почему-то раздражают женщины, которые легко говорят о своих желан…
Сегодня танцуем под открытым небом и провожает лето! 🌆
Проводим сегодня Dark x Ballroom Open Air @ballroom_openair «Танцы на набережной» в Парке Горького, закатное солнце, музыка, которая заставляет остановиться… и люди, которые говорят на одном языке — языке танца.
Сегодня здесь:
— профессиональные танцоры
— любители
— те, кто просто хотят почувствовать атмосферу
В программе:
— открытые танцы
— импровизация
— общ…
«После упражнения на глазной зажим мысли в голове стали тише, я смогла по-настоящему погрузиться в ощущения тела»
Одна из участниц поделилась, что практика на телесные зажимы неожиданно проявилась в самом близком — в близости с партнёром.
Она заметила напряжение, о котором раньше даже не знала…
Заметила момент, где хотелось «убежать в голову», как только становилось слишком чувствительно, слишком уязвимо.
И замет…
Это мы вчера по дороге из Питера в Москву решили попробовать тренд😅
Осваиваем новый скилл перед началом чего-то большего
Угадайте в комментариях, что мы задумали)
Сегодня поговорим про самый эффективный способ инвалидизировать своего мужчину (которым пользуются почти все женщины)
Первый — делать всё самой и не просить. Забронировала, купила продукты, организовала выходные, продумала всё и тд. Он просто рядом. Тело мужчины считывает — здесь мне нечего брать и не берёт.
Второй — контролировать и переделывать. Он сделал — ты переделала, он предложил — ты сразу отвергла и объясн…
Вчера в канале предзаписи провела закрытую презентацию нового проекта «формула счастья»
Первые участницы уже внутри 🖤
Для тех, кто не знает — предзапись — это закрытый канал, где я провожу бесплатные эфиры. Плюс это возможность зайти в мой новый проект по самым лучшим условиям до официального открытия продаж.
На следующую неделю у нас вот такой план:
*Эфир «Я сама» — для тех, кто всё тащит на себе и не умеет расс…
Пришла потанцевать — просто потому что кайф. Мое любимое хобби) которое раньше было профессиональным спортом, способом доказать.
Как камень с плеч после тренировок)
Танцы издревле имеют исцеляющий эффект. Но только если ты приходишь из контакта с телом — за удовольствием, за ощущением себя.
Если приходишь из насилия над собой — с жёстким критиком внутри, танцую через заставляю — никакого исцеления не будет. Тело п…
Во вторник провела эфир «Я сама».
Для тех, кто всё тащит на себе. Кто проще сделает сама, чем попросит. Кто стала мужу мамой, а не женщиной. Кто не умеет выключаться телом и головой — отдых только когда всё доделано, а доделано не бывает никогда.
Разобрали почему это происходит — почему это не про характер и не про то, что вы «слишком сильная».
Это про тело. Телесный сценарий, паттерн, привычку.
Когда в детстве н…
❤10🔥5👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @ali_sha_li. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ali_sha_li named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@ballroom_openair named in 1 post, 4 September 2026 – 4 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Spoonerdance @spoonerdance · 929 (as read 23 September 2026)#51
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Dark floor @darkfloor · 25,707 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 13 September 2026
Вера Бонд 🖤 @vera_bond007 · 85,365 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 18 August 2026
жизнь ксюнка🙊 @ksunoook · 26,475 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 11 September 2026
Maryme.23 @Maria_Melnikova23 · 103,504 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 28 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Али, шали!” (@ali_sha_li), 20,552 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ali_sha_li.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
