Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 794–820 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 11:16
797
-4
9 Sept 2026, 09:37
801
-5
30 Aug 2026, 06:17
806
-2
22 Aug 2026, 21:35
808
-2
15 Aug 2026, 20:26
810
-7
8 Aug 2026, 01:32
817
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:18
817
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 4 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
33 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
20
60.6%
❤🔥
5
15.2%
🔥
4
12.1%
👏
3
9.09%
💔
1
3.03%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2026 to 25 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 11 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @brenlymary. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 February 2026 to 25 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Всем привет) Давно я сюда с новостями не выходила. Завтра выступаю в москвском бизнес клубе Синдикат. Будут предприниматели из твердых ниш! Приглашаю вас🔥
Тема: «Эффективные инструменты лидогенерации и продаж для бизнеса». Я выступаю на тему лидгена через личный бренд. Дам свежую инфу.
Это закрытая встреча для собственников и предпринимателей. Четыре спикера-практика, круги обсуждения и вечер трансформационных игр.…
Кассовый разрыв 17 миллионов. Режим выживания.
И тут же - кто-то бьёт рекорды. Хотя прошлый месяц был дном.
Вот такой он, 2026. Мое агентство в категории «держимся из всех сил». А вот истории ребят в инст (делала там тоже опрос) - некоторые повергли в шок, но есть и позитивные истории!
А у тебя как дела? Читаю каждый ответ - хочу понять что реально происходит у экспертов и предпринимателей прямо сейчас.
Напиши в ко…
Слышали историю про пивнуху, где владелец запретил вход женщинам и за день сделал Х2 выручки?🗿🗿🗿
Я выпустила про это Reels.
Но, честно говоря, такие методы - это не про экологичность и точно не про безопасность. В итоге мужик просто нарвался на огромные штрафы.
Делюсь 5 правилами безопасного ажиотажа, которые не принесут рисков вашему бизнесу:
1. Играйте с форматом, а не с правами
Делайте тематические офферы:
•…
Я не успеваю праздновать подписчиков! Уже 6500😅
С нового года я начала вести свой блог. Я выкладываю 4-5 экспертных роликов в неделю и получила такой результат))
Записала для вас подкаст, где разобрала 3 самых успешных видео, которые привели мне большую часть подписчиков и заявок🔥
Боженька, подай хейтеров в комментариях🥲
Короче, если у тебя в комментах тишина или только «цветочки» от мамы и подруг - твой блог в коме. Сейчас внимание стоит дороже нефти, и просто быть «умным экспертом» - это верный способ остаться незамеченным. Делюсь темой, как заставить охваты взлететь с помощью триггеров. Это такая «лаборатория», где мы учимся бесить, восхищать и провоцировать, чтобы алгоритмы сходили с ума.…
Видели золотую обводку аватара и цветные профили в инсте?
Это новая награда Instagram Rings. Её получили всего 25 человек во всем мире, и что самое крутое - охваты и миллионы подписчиков не были решающим фактором.
Разбираю самых интересных авторов на мой взгляд💪🏻 Если лайкнуть из посты - увидите еще и новый эффект кнопки лайк))
📍 @linda_lomelino — шведский фотограф. Она не просто снимает еду, она создает мрачную, …
Скачала себе MAX ради видеозвонков с родней. И, вот, зашла сегодня бабуле позвонить, а там… макс-каналы😂
Роскомнадзор (РКН) полностью заблокировал Youtube, WhatsApp*, Instagram* и Facebook* на территории России. Их домены удалили из Национальной системы доменных имен.
Теперь у пользователей не открываются эти сайты и приложения, а браузер выдает ошибку, сообщая, что таких адресов не существует.
Все видели, да?
Пок…
Коротко о эволюции контента с 2010 по 2026😂
Очень интересно наблюдать, как технологии в итоге повлияли на тренд этого года.
Я всё-таки за то, чтобы под ИИ аватаров сделали отдельную соцсеть, а в соц сетях для людей были только люди, которые бы продолжили создавать гениальный и красивый контент. И не пытались специально делать контент «менее идеальным», чтобы отличаться от ИИ аватаров. Для меня качественные рилс у ав…
Я вышла замуж и беру фамилию мужа, но эта фамилия будет только в документах. Соц сети, ники, самопрезентации остануться без изменений.
Когда я об этом сказала, многие спросили: а в чем смысл?🥲
Смена фамилии для меня это важная «традиция» + мужу приятно. И одна фамилия в семье - круто, я считаю)
НОООО. Я не собираюсь совершать финансовое самоубийство. Я много лет продвигала свою фамилию. Меня знают. Меня рекомендую…
❤7
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @brenlymary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@brenlymary named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@briancantstopeating named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@linda_lomelino named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@thehomesteadingrd named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ффринг | Вайбкодинг @aiffring · 22,006 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мария Брэнли | Личный бренд и видеомаркетинг” (@brenlymary), 797 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brenlymary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.