Channel
@brendandmurphy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
755subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001377444275 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @brendandmurphy |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/brendandmurphy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 755 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 756 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
42 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 23 | 54.8% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 21.4% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 14.3% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 4.76% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 2.38% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 2.38% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2025 to 12 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The experiments that couldn't be explained away 🤔 Most people who dismiss out-of-body experiences have never seen the experimental record. Not the anecdotes—the controlled laboratory studies. Luminescent screens that lit up in the presence of a projected subtle body. Strain gauges that registered something physically detectable at a remote location. A young woman in a UC Davis sleep lab who did something with odds …
👏7👍1
Full story: https://officialbrendanmurphy.substack.com/p/neptune-model-sinks-before-leaving Have any of you had an experience that no "dying brain" explanation ever really accounted for?
❤1
Officially, there are 5 hours left for this opportunity... My thanks to those of you who have gotten involved and secured your copies (and rewards). Make no mistake: this work is a groundbreaking contribution to post-mortem understanding and metaphysics in general. https://brendandmurphy.com/pre-order/reverse-engineering-the-afterlife
👏1🔥1
HANTA-SCAM ALERT A fun article by Sasha Latypova: 'I am enjoying the sight of a robust and funny(!) public response to the feeble attempts of the pandemic cabal to ignite yet another round of fear and bullshit with the current “hantavirus” psyop. There is no “hantavirus”. The illness exists, it is a poisoning with rat faeces, usually in extremely blighted living conditions, with extremely poor hygiene, dirt floors a…
❤3
New piece is up! https://officialbrendanmurphy.substack.com/p/the-soul-trap-theory-is-half-rightand
👏2
It's live. ‘Reverse Engineering the Afterlife’ is now open for pre-order. 200,000+ words. 14 years of research since Book 1. Cross-tradition, cross-discipline, and uncompromising. This book doesn't ask what various traditions believe about death—it asks what underlying structure explains why those beliefs exist at all. Near-death research. Reincarnation studies. Vedanta, Gnosticism, Neoplatonism. Consciousness sc…
👏4❤2🔥1
This isn’t a promotion. It’s a threshold. 2026 is a ONE year — a year of initiation, not effort. I’m hosting a live Evolve Yourself initiation ceremony this Friday. Simple. Guided. Deeply integrative. No hype. No homework. No personality replacement. You relax. I facilitate. The work integrates organically over time. Before joining, you’ll watch a short explainer webinar and choose how deeply you want to engage …
Where cosmology and the paranormal meet… Read: https://open.substack.com/pub/officialbrendanmurphy/p/what-do-ghosts-and-plasma-have-in
❤1👍1👏1
If you’ve ever wondered why the current neo-Gnostic trend feels off, I lay out exactly where it derailed — and what the original mystics actually knew through direct experience. This is the antidote to the black-pill. Read more 👇 https://officialbrendanmurphy.substack.com/p/gnostic-but-without-the-gnosis
👏2
“William James, the great American philosopher-psychologist, remarked that to most people faith means having faith in someone else’s faith. In the minds of many religious folk, faith has thus devolved into a belief received secondhand from other believers, none of whom are likely to have had any experience of the object of their faith.” -Stephan Hoeller, GNOSTICISM — For a tour de force of what it looks like when som…
🤔1
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1636210590675742
❤1
Most people only hear about the “white light” NDEs. Almost no one talks about the ones that feel like hell. Not punishment—just raw, unfiltered consciousness meeting its own unfinished business. These accounts are uncommon, but when they show up… they change everything we think we know about death, morality, and the mechanics of the afterlife. I’m breaking down what the hellish NDEs actually point to—based on resea…
👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @brendandmurphy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 648,251 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Brendan D. Murphy Official” (@brendandmurphy), 755 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brendandmurphy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.