Вдруг кому надо😭
custom 59042585221026361774

Channel
@bredjatina_riki
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
65subscribers
+21 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003892977236 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bredjatina_riki |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 28 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bredjatina_riki |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 65 | +2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:16 | 63 | +7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 56 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:44 | 55 | +5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 50 | +6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 44 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 44 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
72 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5418321833424341184 | 18 | 25.0% | |
| custom 5219989078442799183 | 17 | 23.6% | |
| custom 5217619261517758832 | 10 | 13.9% | |
| custom 5904258522102636177 | 10 | 13.9% | |
| custom 5215500322222405778 | 8 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5321249250342891674 | 5 | 6.94% | |
| custom 5915961298666921618 | 2 | 2.78% | |
| custom 6037190306829442604 | 2 | 2.78% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вдруг кому надо😭
custom 59042585221026361774
✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ Поздно, но как успела. Буду все три дня, буду рада всех видеть!!! 🥹
custom 60371903068294426042custom 52176192615177588321custom 59042585221026361771
Бредни Рики Сексон pinned a photo
Моя любимая фотография 👋
custom 521998907844279918312custom 54183218334243411842
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 ✝️🔤🔤🔤✝️ С Колей🌟, Варей🌟, Майлом🌟 и Мишелей🌟! Мини пост тк. мало фоторграфий. Мы в лагере и участвовали в главном конкурсе смены Как то позже обязательно с колей сделаем нормальный пост вдвоем.🌟
custom 52155003222224057787custom 53212492503428916744custom 59042585221026361772custom 59159612986669216181
Вот так вот. С лагеря приколы
custom 59042585221026361773custom 59159612986669216181
Channel name was changed to «Бредни Рики Сексон»
Этот тоже ублюдок. -Свечка
custom 54183218334243411848custom 52199890784427991835
Он такой немощь. -Свечка
custom 54183218334243411848custom 53212492503428916741
Со Свечкой работаем (Честно, не тупеем)🌟
custom 52176192615177588329custom 52155003222224057781
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @bredjatina_riki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бредни Рики Сексон” (@bredjatina_riki), 65 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bredjatina_riki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.