Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ㅤㅤ #

@breathnot

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

25subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003400707866
TypeChannel
Username@breathnot
Created3 December 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/breathnot

Growth

252625.512 Aug 2026, 13:19 — 26 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 19:35 — 25 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 13:1912 Aug 2026, 19:35
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25–26 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:3525-1
12 Aug 2026, 13:1926first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 3 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

114 reactions across 3 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54453007864582967441714.9%
custom 52178442104298808531311.4%
custom 5206175845143573633119.65%
custom 520620091057271387797.89%
custom 520638263922893980997.89%
custom 537761960518120017697.89%
custom 542286928896278425787.02%
custom 521305033973278458476.14%
custom 528981641192803531365.26%
custom 527156996063052438254.39%
custom 536656897645111715743.51%
custom 537754732088158619443.51%
custom 542255151292248860043.51%
custom 543597112105894774943.51%
custom 521098619563018197321.75%
custom 521313358049393479310.877%
custom 533039166375805034110.877%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 December 2025 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Dec 2025, 17:13 UTC≈2,980 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤ I'm love loppez ! 💞

custom 52061758451435736336custom 52063826392289398094custom 52178442104298808534custom 52715699606305243824custom 54453007864582967444custom 52130503397327845843custom 53303916637580503411

31 Dec 2025, 17:13 UTC≈41,000 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

связьㅤ|ㅤдмㅤ|ㅤпобедыㅤ|ㅤсвязь по поводу уступки и т.д

custom 544530078645829674413custom 52062009105727138779custom 52178442104298808539custom 52061758451435736335custom 52063826392289398095custom 52130503397327845844custom 52109861956301819732custom 52131335804939347931

5 Dec 2025, 08:18 UTC≈20,300 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤhi 🍼ㅤㅤ

custom 53776196051812001769custom 54228692889627842578custom 52898164119280353136custom 53665689764511171574custom 53775473208815861944custom 54225515129224886004custom 54359711210589477494custom 52715699606305243821

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @breathnot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 544,979 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ㅤㅤ #” (@breathnot), 25 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/breathnot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.