Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Хранительница хлеба 🍞🍓

@breadberry69

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

65subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001559199185
TypeChannel
Username@breadberry69
DescriptionВсякий хлебный бред🤭🤡🩷
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/breadberry69

Growth

658 August 2026 — 65 subscribers10 August 2026 — 65 subscribers8 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 64–66 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 02:4565no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:1865first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
98.1%
avg views ÷ 65 subscribers
Avg views / post
63.8
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held14 (26 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total829
Reactions total132
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 02:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,910
Videos
124
Links
94

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

132 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53620654111834841862418.2%
custom 53595133845658780322115.9%
custom 54607527043997448792115.9%
2115.9%
custom 5796334424974954592118.33%
custom 5213079957827247814107.58%
❤‍🔥96.82%
custom 521338560058492799775.30%
custom 523817075304357758443.03%
🔥43.03%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC28 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Не заходила пару дней в тг из-за загруженности, а вы мне тут такой приятный завоз реакций устроили 🫶☺️💐 лучшие фр 🫂

custom 53620654111834841864custom 54607527043997448794

6 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC37 views36 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Давайте посмотрим сколько реакций соберёт шикарная фотокарточка Кукушки без красивого оформления поста, вот такой сегодня у нас эксперимент🫶 #хлебныйкосплей@breadberry69

custom 536206541118348418614❤‍🔥9custom 57963344249749545926custom 53595133845658780323custom 52130799578272478142custom 54607527043997448792

5 Aug 2026, 23:09 UTC42 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Впервые меня на работе назвали бабкой старой и я этому рада ☺️ Для контекста - практически все ребята, которые узнают мой возраст, говорят, что "ой правда? Ты не выглядишь на столько, я бы дал(а) 16-18, 20 максимум" Мне безумно приятно канеш ехехе (всё ещё могу косплеить школьниц ха?), но такого контраста я не ожидала 🤪 было забавно

7

4 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC53 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Если Буря не пошутит про ХоноЮкихо, я стреляю в шашлык 💥

custom 52381707530435775842custom 52130799578272478141custom 53595133845658780321

4 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC41 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @lunamoonshade

👽🧦™️🦄🛼🥑🐈™️🪀🍷 Представь, что мы делаем с тобой парный косплей. Кого будем делать и почему? 👁 Или кем ты меня видишь в пару к уже своему сделанному образу? 😇

2 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC59 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Пока что ничего такого в жизни не происходит, ловите парочку слегка пьяных👁 фото 🍓

custom 535951338456587803254custom 54607527043997448793

29 Jul 2026, 20:16 UTC87 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Весь день настроение по одному месту (спасибо, пмс 🤔), но хотя бы с одним из любимых менеджеров + под конец смены включили экспонат от бойки и все дружно пели, что аж моральный дух подняли лол

custom 53595133845658780322custom 52130799578272478141custom 53620654111834841861

28 Jul 2026, 13:24 UTC83 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Так привычнее 🙂

5custom 52381707530435775842custom 52130799578272478141

27 Jul 2026, 21:54 UTC83 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Очень нишевый эдит ящитаю Делала сама 🤪

🔥4

27 Jul 2026, 11:14 UTC73 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Так долго нигде не фоткалась в полнорост, что уже забыла как позировать лол??? 😡 #хлебныйфест@breadberry69

5custom 52130799578272478142custom 53595133845658780322custom 57963344249749545921

26 Jul 2026, 19:31 UTC68 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Бляяяяяять мне так нравится моя Уиллоу, ожидала, что будет в разы хуже, а тут прям мили, но работать есть над чем!

custom 54607527043997448794custom 53595133845658780323custom 52130799578272478142

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @breadberry69. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,022,139 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Хранительница хлеба 🍞🍓” (@breadberry69), 65 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/breadberry69.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.