BTCs Community Channel pinned «BTCs 冲推铁军群:https://t.me/BTCs_Army»

Channel
BTCs Community Channel
@brc20BTCs
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
306subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002090944218 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @brc20BTCs |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 8 February 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/brc20BTCs |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 306 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 309 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 311 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 311 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
29 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 16 | 55.2% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 17.2% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 10.3% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 6.90% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 6.90% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 3.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2024 to 8 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
BTCs 冲推铁军群:https://t.me/BTCs_Army
👍2❤1
https://x.com/btcs_en/status/1780248085006020794?s=46
👎2
$BTCs 将积极推动与Merlin's Phantom 梅林幻影 @MerlinLayer2 @BitmapTech 、@UniCrossGlobal 的深度合作。在不增发 $BTCs 前提下,让 $BTCs 随意穿梭在BTC L1,L2,ETH,Solana等所有生态,彻底释放 $BTCs 的巨大流动性和潜力,形成 #BTCs 多链互通,并积极探索图转币、币转图等多种可能性玩法。 $BTCs 作为brc20铭文头部社区,将积极推动铭文符文的联合发展,将以开发包容的态度,推动 $BTCs 铭文与符文的等值互换,在不增发 $BTCs 的前提下,形成 #BTCs 全链、全协议、图币全向性玩法,让BTCs的meme价值得到充分挖掘。 #Merlinlayer2 #BRC20 #Runes https://x.com/btcs_zh/status/1778788734944882739?s=46
👍4🔥2
https://twitter.com/btcs_zh/status/1777281460095086993?s=46
https://twitter.com/BTCs_en/status/1770690996806005244?s=19
👍3🔥1🥰1
🎉 BTCs ✘ Unicross 达成战略合作! @MerlinLayer2 上最大的市场 @UniCrossGlobal 将 $BTCs 列为首批支付代币,可用于 BTC L1/L2层铭文铸造!BTCs作为铭文生态最具潜力的社区,致力于推动大饼生态的发展! Unicross为 #BTCs 社区提供了价值1000u的BTCs,中英双号同步抽奖! https://twitter.com/BTCs_zh/status/1770691750908350600?s=19 https://twitter.com/BTCs_en/status/1770690996806005244?s=19
👍2❤1
https://twitter.com/BTCs_zh/status/1770318246459080720?s=19
https://twitter.com/BTClabs_x/status/1770309244321222734?s=19
👍2❤1
Congratulations to BTCs on their strategic partnership with BitRealms_web3. Merlin Chain's largest meta-universe social gaming platform empowers $BTCs. Wallet holders of $BTCs can participate in the exclusive game Bit Treasure for trolling. https://twitter.com/BitRealms_web3/status/1768314541199495427?t=BpfWhatXHrA4SyDi89ZZbw&s=19
🔥1
BitRealms, the largest open-ended metaverse social in the Bitcoin ecosystem gaming platform has announced a partnership with the BTCs community. https://twitter.com/BitRealms_web3/status/1768176279440781742?t=XcUvv9NnzTjvGFzX5uSvHg&s=19
👍1🔥1
比特生态最大的元宇宙游戏社交平台Bitreamls宣布了与BTCs的合作。🚀 https://twitter.com/BitRealms_web3/status/1768176279440781742?t=XcUvv9NnzTjvGFzX5uSvHg&s=19
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @brc20BTCs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@brc20BTCs named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BTCs Community Channel” (@brc20BTCs), 306 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brc20BTCs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.