9 May 2024, 00:29 UTC82 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026
https://x.com/revistaoeste/status/1788327160496685200?t=-I1BBgRWDeT0VwxpPy5uWQ&s=09
Channel
Brazil Report 🇧🇷🇧🇷
@brazilreport
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
20subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001508168132 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @brazilreport |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/brazilreport |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 20 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 19 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 18 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 18 | first reading |
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 18 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 01s
- Average length
- 31s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
10 Apr 2024, 00:04 UTC106 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
1 Mar 2024, 14:22 UTC65 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @BellumActaNews
— The idea that somehow Biden's USA is against Lula or vice versa (that Lula is somehow the Iberian-American Messiah that will lead Brazil to Muh Multipolarity) is a childish and layman's idea, as if we look from the beginning of the current Brazilian president's campaign and specially who has financed it since 2022, all the fingers and paths are in the same direction: to Washington. https://t.me/BellumActaNews/7665…
1 Mar 2024, 14:22 UTC48 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @BellumActaNewsPhoto
Admin comment: — Unlike it is believed by the Anglophone Dissident Right, Brazilian current Government isn't exactly Anti-Zionist, but rather anti-Reviosionist Zionism and Kahanism, which contrast exactly the secularist and anti-nationalist nature of the Brazilian Jewish community, especially that which supports Lula ➡️ Brazilian Labor Zionist Organizations such as "Jews for Democracy", as well as the Open Society F…
25 Feb 2024, 22:24 UTC31 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @jairbolsonarobrasilVideo
- 25 de fevereiro de 2024:
25 Feb 2024, 18:47 UTC29 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @BellumActaNewsVideo
🇧🇷🔥📹 — Videos shared on Lusophone social media shows the amount of Brazilian citizens gathered inside the Paulista Avenue, Central São Paulo city, to protest against Lula's Government and against the unconstitutional abuses of power by the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court According to the São Paulo's Government estimatives, around 300,000 people are gathered there. Brazilian Republican flags are seen everywhere in t…
25 Feb 2024, 17:35 UTC15 viewsread 11 August 2026
https://fxtwitter.com/visegrad24/status/1761766092123345307?s=20
25 Feb 2024, 17:31 UTC10 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
18 Feb 2024, 21:58 UTC13 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo
https://twitter.com/IsraeliPM/status/1759283035092955265?t=E5TlagRXmU2omfT-T8X8RA&s=19
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @brazilreport. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Brazil Report 🇧🇷🇧🇷” (@brazilreport), 20 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brazilreport.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.