Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

[ЗАКРЫТО] BRAWL TRIGGER👾

@brawl_trigger

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

41subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002037012448
TypeChannel
Username@brawl_trigger
DescriptionCr: BananaQ Бот-предложка — @brawl_trigger_bot
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/brawl_trigger

Growth

4110 Aug 2026, 07:46 — 41 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 18:02 — 41 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 07:4610 Aug 2026, 18:02
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40–42 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 18:0241no change
10 Aug 2026, 07:4641first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 3 July 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
252
Videos
22
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

108 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👾2825.9%
🔥1816.7%
1614.8%
🤯1413.0%
custom 546989239910060959887.41%
👍76.48%
💔76.48%
❤‍🔥65.56%
custom 528081485626030809110.926%
10.926%
🥰10.926%
🥱10.926%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2024 to 20 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2024, 17:37 UTC319 views31 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Добрый вечер. Приносим глубочайшие извинения, но было принято решение закрыть бравл триггер по причине того, что владелец выгорел к нему, а у второго админа нет желания его вести, так что мы имеем вот такой конец. Благодарим всех, кто был подписан, бустил, писал комментарии и тейки сюда, это было незабываемое время! Замены нам есть 100%, так что теперь пишите о своём недовольстве бравлом там. На этом всё, может быть,

🤯14💔7custom 54698923991006095987👾21

Signed Вадя Яйцо Стрэндж

12 Jul 2024, 12:56 UTC355 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Люди в фандоме Бравла это что-то с чем-то.они говорят что кредиты лучше ведь ты можешь выбрать бравлера которого ты хочешь а в ящиках обязательно выбивать,окей,а что делать если перс которого я хочу будет спустя 20 бойцов? #Тейк @brawl_trigger

👾6👍3❤‍🔥2🔥2

Signed Вадя Яйцо Стрэндж

12 Jul 2024, 12:55 UTC288 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

почему я тащу на 1звездочном персонаже на алмазный лиге суко 🗣🗣🗣 #Тейк @brawl_trigger

🔥61👍1👾1

Signed Вадя Яйцо Стрэндж

8 Jul 2024, 18:32 UTC287 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Пожалуйста не берите Спайка куда попало. Он на такую закрытую карту(Пенальти) не может подходит #Тейк @brawl_trigger

🔥3👾1custom 54698923991006095981

Signed Вадя Яйцо Стрэндж

8 Jul 2024, 17:50 UTC201 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Пора бы уже поработать, верно? Я хочу сделать небольшое реоформление триггера, но для этого мне нужно выбрать бравлера маскота, который светился бы на инфо-посте, правилах и аватарке бота. Какого бы персонажа вы хотели бы видеть на месте эдакого лица бравл триггера? Пишите свои варианты в комментариях и позже будет проведён опрос, ждём ваших предложений!

3❤‍🔥1👾1

Signed Вадя Яйцо Стрэндж

8 Jul 2024, 17:41 UTC162 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Блять бро если у тебя не прокаченные персы, не иди в этот ранговый блять. Чел так себе играет в ограбление, не помогает команде, и просто в слепую идет бить сейф, а как только доходит до сейфа его сразу же там мудохают. Гнида ебаная никогда больше не играй в ранговый #Тейк @brawl_trigger

👾2

Signed Вадя Яйцо Стрэндж

8 Jul 2024, 17:41 UTC134 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ЭТО РОФЛ КАКОЙ-ТО БЛЯТЬ Я ВАХУИ #Тейк @brawl_trigger

👾3❤‍🔥1

Signed Вадя Яйцо Стрэндж

3 Jul 2024, 21:31 UTC170 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Триггер на людей, которые пытаются выгнать других ото всюду. С сетка бскм, с бравл бскфкм, ото всюду назуй #Тейк @brawl_trigger

👾41❤‍🔥1

Signed Вадя Яйцо Стрэндж

3 Jul 2024, 17:06 UTC179 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Рандомы совсем ахуели (в частности особи на пайпер👊👊) я уже у вашей квартиры #Тейк @brawl_trigger

👾2

Signed Вадя Яйцо Стрэндж

3 Jul 2024, 17:04 UTC124 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

У меня аллергия на этих челов. Я просто написала под видео с деталями из нового обновления, что ещё, вообще-то, сменили местоимения в описании Анджело. Почему каждый раз когда я это кому-то показываю, меня поливают говном? И речь не только об комментариях под этим видео. Боже, это не я придумала, я просто радуюсь небольшой, но репрезентации, почему я не могу этого написать если это по теме ролика?? Не анон Борщик си

2👍2👾1🥱1

Signed Вадя Яйцо Стрэндж

3 Jul 2024, 17:02 UTC146 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

фрэнк заебал. я все #Тейк @brawl_trigger

🔥3👾1🥰1

Signed Вадя Яйцо Стрэндж

3 Jul 2024, 17:02 UTC161 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

сперва фд бравла такой: "как можно шипперить лцест????" "они даже не знакомы, фуу" "палитры и альтушки испортили фд своим приходом и пейрингами фууу" "гасбастеры/мелогасы аааа!!!!" а затем идут шутить про джесси/френк #Тейк @brawl_trigger

6🔥3❤‍🔥1👍1👾1

Signed Вадя Яйцо Стрэндж

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @brawl_trigger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 670,066 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[ЗАКРЫТО] BRAWL TRIGGER👾” (@brawl_trigger), 41 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brawl_trigger.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.