Channel
@bravetalknews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
823subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 28 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004434256826 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bravetalknews |
| Description | Authentic community updates posted daily. Real news only — no fake news, no misinformation. Giveaways and Gifts as well. Ads: $25 usd @headshotting ·Founder @bravetalknews -OTC @spotOTC Own: @headshotting Ads: t.me/bravetalkads |
| First recorded | 28 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bravetalknews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Sept 2026, 08:22 | 823 | no change |
| 28 Sept 2026, 07:47 | 823 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 September 2026 – 18 September 2026) |
| Views total | 22,746 |
| Reactions total | 73 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
73 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 18 | 24.7% | |
| 😭 | 17 | 23.3% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 19.2% | |
| 👌 | 7 | 9.59% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 9.59% | |
| custom 5393313205227366608 | 4 | 5.48% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 4.11% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 4.11% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚠️ JUST IN: Duel Blackjack Studio Shut Down After Intruder Incident Duel has indefinitely suspended its Blackjack table after an intruder entered its studio, forcing the entire building to temporarily close. According to Duel, the suspect is in custody and no one was injured. The company has not provided further details or an ETA for when the table will reopen. Duel said it is awaiting a full report from the studi…
😁3🔥2🙏2
🚨HACKER TRIED TO STEAL $7.8M — A BOT STOLE IT FIRST An attacker found a flaw in a custom module connected to an Ethereum Safe wallet and attempted to drain around 2,900 rsETH worth ~$7.8M. But an automated MEV bot called “Yoink” spotted the exploit transaction and front-ran it in the same Ethereum block, taking the rsETH before the original attacker could. The attacker’s transaction then reverted. 💰 ~$7.8M rsETH drai…
custom 53933132052273666084
many people will view your ads posts get average 100-200 viewers from our chat
@spotOTC 1 star rn go post ads
Make sure you post in @spotOTC new OTC 20% off today, will also be holding a gambling session later and depositing randoms via the Spin wheel, be active and turn notifications for that
👌3🔥1🙏1
🧱 Giveaway Finished 🧱 Total tickets: 365 Winners list: 1. Tama Gadget #101784 - @Jcrypto9
👌1👍1🔥1
Signed MRKT
⚠️ REVOLUT HANDED CUSTOMER DATA TO A SCAMMER A malicious actor used a legitimate government agency email domain to send fake information requests to Revolut. Revolut treated the requests as real and disclosed sensitive customer data that could include: 💳 Passports / ID documents 📞 Verification selfies 🏠 Home addresses 💳 Account + withdrawal records 🤑Full Bitcoin transaction histories Revolut says its systems and cust…
Guys post in @bravepublic 50 stars and tons of people reading your messages post good ads only
Make sure if you sent messages in promo street your doing it in @bravepublic now cause that channel got termed
@promostreet is gone now it is @bravetalknews join OTC btw
good gambling session we had if you wanna make $ be there next time
😭5
Doing a bravetalk gambling sesh join if you wanna watch and make some money potentially https://talk.brave.com/ydtMU183riCq7SXMp_LdkrunGEeLK7Kr0ikk-V8HBtc 👀
😭2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bravetalknews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Brave News” (@bravetalknews), 823 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bravetalknews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.