Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ТОЧКА Б. ГДЕ ВСË СХОДИТСЯ.

@bratashova_ae

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

164subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002314251477
TypeChannel
Username@bratashova_ae
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bratashova_ae

Growth

1621641638 August 2026 — 162 subscribers8 August 2026 — 162 subscribers14 August 2026 — 164 subscribers8 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 162–164 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 23:13164+2
8 Aug 2026, 17:01162no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:47162first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 24 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.9%
avg views ÷ 164 subscribers
Avg views / post
49.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
12.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held18 (24 April 20254 August 2026)
Views total49
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 36s
Average length
1m 36s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

194 reactions across 18 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥4824.7%
custom 51950337679698392323116.0%
💯2412.4%
2110.8%
🙏136.70%
custom 5357579953497983889115.67%
👌94.64%
🤝94.64%
🤩84.12%
custom 525375297599780346052.58%
custom 522469445133875999731.55%
custom 536385328580973529231.55%
💋31.55%
custom 520169199377581813810.515%
custom 530313878200492458810.515%
custom 536384539165984666310.515%
🎉10.515%
😘10.515%
🙉10.515%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 194reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2025 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bratashova_ae. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 April 2025 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC49 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Неделя была боевая. Логистика. Новые проекты. Автоматизация. Новые боты. Созвоны, решения и процессы, которые пора заставить работать нормально. Я умею долго ехать на характере. Но тело в эти игры не играет. В какой-то момент оно просто говорит: «Всё. Приехали». Об этом, кстати, мы говорили в подкасте. Фрагмент - в ролике. 🧘🏻‍♀️ А я уезжаю на випассану: выключить шум и перезагрузить голову. До 11 августа меня не б

❤‍🔥3custom 51950337679698392322custom 52537529759978034601

15 Jul 2026, 07:42 UTC124 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Недавно мы с Юлей Борисовной https://t.me/podkast_7 записали подкаст. Поговорили о логистике, бизнесе, автоматизации, ИИ и о том, почему ни одна технология не заменит системное мышление. О том, как я пришла к тому, что сегодня называю своим подходом: Мыслю как инженер. Работаю как часовщик. Получился очень живой разговор — не только про инструменты, но и про людей, решения и путь предпринимателя. Буду рада, если

❤‍🔥53custom 53575799534979838892🎉1custom 51950337679698392321

9 Jul 2026, 16:05 UTC135 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥7custom 51950337679698392323custom 53638532858097352923

8 Jul 2026, 20:08 UTC146 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Одно из самых ценных, что дает предпринимательское окружение, — возможность заглянуть внутрь чужого бизнеса. В нашей форум-группе мы регулярно приезжаем друг к другу в гости: смотрим производства, обсуждаем решения, задаем вопросы, делимся опытом. Не для того, чтобы что-то продать или скопировать, а чтобы увидеть, как мыслят люди, которые строят сильные компании. В этот раз мы были в гостях у Сергея Александровича.

5🤝3custom 51950337679698392323

7 Jul 2026, 17:09 UTC140 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

5❤‍🔥5💋3custom 53031387820049245881

7 Jul 2026, 15:19 UTC155 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Последние месяцы я всё чаще ловила себя на мысли, что мне тесно в этом канале. Не потому, что закончились темы. Как раз наоборот. Их стало слишком много. И каждый раз, когда я садилась писать, внутри появлялся какой-то стопор. Потому что канал больше не отражал меня. Когда-то всё было просто. Я была продажником. Потом логистом. Потом стала собственником компании и управленцем. Начала строить процессы. Потом консульт

💯4custom 53575799534979838894🤩1custom 51950337679698392321

22 Jun 2026, 14:29 UTC241 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«Клиентов раздражают скрипты, агрессивные продажи и вся эта неискренность». (с) И знаете что? Я согласна. Частично. Потому что людей действительно раздражают плохие скрипты. 💩 Когда менеджер разговаривает так, словно читает инструкцию к микроволновке. 💩 Когда на любой вопрос у него заготовлен один и тот же ответ. 💩 Когда ты чувствуешь, что тебя не слушают, а просто пытаются дотащить до оплаты. Вот это действи

👌2💯2custom 51950337679698392321custom 53575799534979838891

19 Jun 2026, 22:02 UTC182 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Один сотрудник. Один звонок. Одна репутация компании. Иногда миллионы рублей потенциального оборота зависят от того, как человек ответит на входящий звонок. Самая дорогая ошибка в B2B - это не высокая цена. Не плохой сайт. Не слабый маркетинг. И даже не проигранный тендер. Самая дорогая ошибка - это сотрудник, который забывает, что представляет компанию в каждом разговоре. Недавно разбирала запись одного телефон

💯7custom 51950337679698392323🤝2

18 Jun 2026, 07:43 UTC141 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Многие грузовладельцы уверены, что работают с перевозчиками. На практике часто оказывается иначе. Логистика — это не только грузовики и склады. Это нервы, деньги и контроль. Недавно мы задали клиентам простой вопрос: Вы знаете, кто на самом деле возит ваши грузы? Большинство сразу отвечают: — Конечно. Но когда начинаем разбираться глубже, выясняется интересная вещь. Очень многие грузовладельцы не всегда понимают

custom 52537529759978034602💯1🤩1custom 51950337679698392321custom 52246944513387599971

8 May 2026, 17:31 UTC376 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

7 ВРЕДНЫХ СОВЕТОВ ПО ИИ. Ну помните, как у Г.Остера: если хочешь сделать всё максимально плохо - вот тебе подробная инструкция. Так вот. Иногда мне кажется, что половина советов по ИИ в интернете сегодня пишется именно по этому принципу. Поэтому открываю рубрику: «Вредные советы в ИИ». Если хотите получать от нейросети странный, шаблонный и бесполезный результат - продолжайте делать вот это 👇🏻 Миф №1. Чем длиннее

💯2❤‍🔥1🤝1custom 51950337679698392321custom 53575799534979838891

30 Apr 2026, 17:49 UTC357 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Дело №3. "Вальпургиева ночь рынка экспедиторов." Сегодня логистический рынок волновало одно: “МЫ НЕ УСПЕЛИ - НАМ КОНЕЦ?” Нет. Не конец. Но проблема в другом. Вы смотрели не туда. Начнём с фактов, а не эмоций. 📌 Закон говорит чётко:Экспедитор ОБЯЗАН подать уведомление до 30.04.2026 (ч. 5 ст. 5 ФЗ №140-ФЗ) Уполномоченный орган ОБЯЗАН внести в реестр в течение 7 рабочих дней (ч. 5 ст. 2.5 ФЗ №87-ФЗ) А теперь реальност

👌3🙏2💯1🤝1🙉1custom 51950337679698392321

1 Apr 2026, 15:13 UTC363 views6 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Логистика - это не только перевозки. Это про масштаб мышления. Как и обещала, рассказываю. Сходили на экскурсию в Яндекс. И честно - это тот случай, когда лучше один раз увидеть изнутри, чем сто раз услышать снаружи. Что было: ✅провели по всем этажам офиса ✅показали, как устроено пространство ✅рассказали про процессы и команду ✅накормили (шведский стол, да 😏) ✅и самое главное - дали возможность задавать любые вопрос

custom 52537529759978034602💯1🤝1custom 51950337679698392321custom 52016919937758181381

Signed Александра Евгеньевна

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @bratashova_ae. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 963,256 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ТОЧКА Б. ГДЕ ВСË СХОДИТСЯ.” (@bratashova_ae), 164 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bratashova_ae.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.