Channel
@brandkalyanova
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
552subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001286325552 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @brandkalyanova |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/brandkalyanova |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 01:58 | 552 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 553 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 553 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 4 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (4 May 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 399 |
| Reactions total | 73 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 03:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
179 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 95 | 53.1% | |
| 🔥 | 37 | 20.7% | |
| 👏 | 17 | 9.50% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 7.26% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 4.47% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 3.35% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 1.68% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 179reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я ЧУТЬ НЕ РОДИЛА В ТЮРЬМЕ Недавно смотрела стендап Орлова про индивидуальных предпринимателей. Если конкретнее, как он сдавал первую декларацию. Жизненно максимально! Посмотрите. У меня тоже была такая история. Я беременна на 8 месяце, 2024 год. Моему ИП уже 6 лет, я плачу все налоги и тревожно сдаю все отчеты, потому что контролер. И вот мне приходит письмо счастья. Елена Евгеньевна, вы - злостная нарушительница …
❤4👍2🔥2
Дожила до времен, когда нельзяграмм стал больше, чем мой телеграм-канал. Истина «где фокус - там и результат» работает. Теперь нужно телегу подтягивать 🙈. И нельзяграм мне для этих целей тоже пригодится. Нужен пост, что помогло вырасти в нельзяграмме?
🔥9❤7👏4👍1
План выполнен с горочкой 🥰🙈. Принимаю поздравления! 🍾 . теперь важно не сдавать темп и прокатиться на этой волне роста дальше. А еще вплотную заняться трафиком из инсты в тг-канал (потому что без призывов это еле перекрывает отписки).
❤10🔥8🎉5🥰3
Ну что, совсем немного осталось до цели в нельзяграмме 🙈. Не верится…. Это был сложный бой 😅.
🔥11❤7
Из-за отката инсты это был сложный бой 🙈🤣. Даже само приложение поздравило с не самой круглой датой. Двигаемся дальше!
❤13🔥7🥰5
Новости моих страданий в нельзяграмме - откатила откат самой соц сети (была массовая блокировка аккаунта, и я лишилась 80 человек). На меня подписались как раз примерно такое количество за неделю. Не такой темп я, конечно, хотела. Придумала новые форматы и села записывать в среду. Что может случиться? Упал штатив и часть микрофона разлетелась в щепки 😂. В щепки. Посмеялась над сопротивлением. Заказала новый микрофо…
❤9👍5👏3
Миллениалы против зумеров. Или нет? В аккаунте маленького (эм…) медиа разгорелся скандал. Смм возмутилась, что ей не повысили зп, потому что она сняла другую квартиру и завела собачку. Разозлилась из-за совещания в 11.00. И отсутствием ДМС. Попросила расчет, но отрабатывать 2 недели - не захотела. В итоге сменила пароль аккаунта и выставила пост на странице того самого медиа. Хрестоматийная переписка зуммера и милле…
❤6👏1😢1
Фраза, которая всегда меня поддерживает. Может быть, для кого-то это тоже сейчас будет вовремя: — Не грусти, — сказала Алисa. — Рано или поздно все станет понятно, все станет на свои места и выстроится в единую красивую схему, как кружева. Станет понятно, зачем все было нужно, потому что все будет правильно. Вообще, считаю, что эта книга энциклопедия мудрости.
❤12👏4👍3
Дорогой дневник, мне не описать всей боли и унижения 🙈😁. Нельзяграм * запрещенная соц сеть * сейчас делает массовые зачистки неактивных аккаунтов. И вместо подписок - удалил у меня 80 пипищиков 🙈😁. Что в целом логично, так как у меня очень старый аккаунт и наверняка много странных подписок было. Из разряда спамеров. Но как же обидно то! Ничего…. Засучили рукава и двигаемся дальше.
❤9👏5😢2
Продолжаем страдать работать над продвижением. За 5 дней блог вырос на 60 подписчиков. Из них два - я отдыхала. И мне, конечно же, мало. Со связью с реальностью я еще работаю 😁. До конца мая поставила себе дикую цель - вырастить аккаунт до 10к. Хотите здесь будет реалити? Давайте 20 ❤️ и делаем.
❤18👍2🎉1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @brandkalyanova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,307,927 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Искусство Бренда” (@brandkalyanova), 552 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brandkalyanova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.