Channel
@bragarnatalia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
186subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002268140094 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bragarnatalia |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bragarnatalia |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 186 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 182 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 183 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 183 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 317 |
| Reactions total | 22 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
47 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 72.3% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 19.1% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 4.26% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 2.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Детали конкурса, и формуляр подачи заявки ТУТ Речь идет о конкурсе: Если вы любите фотографировать - неважно, профессионально или просто для души, - обязательно посмотрите этот конкурс. Это международный фотоконкурс ASISAFoto 2026 ... в котором могут участвовать фотографы со всего мира. 💶 Призы очень приятные: ✨ 6 500 € чёрно-белая серия ✨ 6 500 € цветная серия ✨ 2 500 € портрет ✨ 2 500 € материнство и детство …
Здравствуйте! А где можно почитать информацию про участие в конкурсе фотографий?
Сегодня с Полиной - основательницей ДиалогоСтудия в Литве провели прямой эфир на тему "проектный менеджер в грантовых проектах" Эфир тут И на эфире я пообещала подарить Гайд-список с подборкой AI-инструментов, которые мне помогают при работе с грантами, поэтому: Приветствую всех новых коллег и в пдф формате обещанный Гайд-список *а в комментариях - расскажите о себе: кто, откуда, какой род деятельности))
❤2
📊 Как Польша использует средства ЕС (данные на 2 августа 2026 года) Министерство фондов и региональной политики Польши опубликовало свежую статистику реализации программ Фондов ЕС 2021-2027. На сегодняшний день: • открыто 5 007 конкурсов с общим бюджетом 333,9 млрд злотых; • подано 80 868 заявок на сумму 627,4 млрд злотых; • подписано 29 920 договоров о финансировании; • общая стоимость реализуемых проектов соста…
❤3
Девочки, завтра вечером у меня в Instagram будет прямой эфир с Полиной из Вильнюса, владелицей языковой студии. Хотите узнать, как в Литве относятся к нашим, какие там есть возможности для людей с опытом миграции и реально ли найти себя в новой стране? Дайте реакций, если тема интересна, и завтра я опубликую анонс с точным временем))
❤1
☕️ Факт дня. К 2028 году AI в e-commerce может достичь 1,2 трлн долларов США. Для меня это еще одно подтверждение того, что искусственный интеллект перестал быть «модной темой» и становится частью экономики. Поэтому в грантовых конкурсах всё чаще появляются проекты по цифровизации, автоматизации и внедрению AI. Если компания может показать, что AI помогает ей работать эффективнее, это уже не фантазия, а вполне реа…
Погадаем? Ожидается, что обьем электронной коммерции, основанной на AI достигнет ____ к 2028 году.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
Ураааа, мой канал в инстаграм пересек рубеж 2000 подписчиков, у меня было 1500 - и следующие 500 набирались очень долго - месяцев 9 ))) и последние 50 буквально за пару дней)) **с удовольствием приму ваши поздравления))
❤10👍3👏2
Показываю другую «дверь к деньгам»: гранты от фондов крупных компаний - ORLEN, PZU, PKO BP. Сейчас есть три: 1. Fundacja ORLEN - Model United Nations До 30 000 zł на один проект. Общий бюджет - 450 000 zł. Набор идёт до 7 ноября 2026 года. Подаваться могут фонды и ассоциации, существующие от одного года, школы, вузы, учреждения культуры и самоуправления. Деньги дают на молодёжные дебаты, международное сотрудничес…
👍1
☕️ Колежанки, сделала рилс «3 ошибки, которые убивают грантовую заявку» Это в ИНСТАГРАМ И по слову ОШИБКА в комментариях высылаю гайд-тест из 17 пунктов… Памагите! Напишите это слово в коммент - надо проверить до всех ли долетает)) Рилс ТУТ Каждой 100 евро в карму ☺️
🔥1
Как сделать презентацию своей идеи для гранта. Я использую Гамма ИИ Ее можно использовать и для создания презентации для уроков, отчетов, как допматериал по гранту)
Колллеги! Вы делаете разбор своего аккаунта в инстаграм? Я вот сейчас делаю - и ржу не могу))) и вот что мне пишет ЧатаДжипити: "Вот пример. Есть обложка "Правило Стива Джобса 10-80-10" Мне интересно. Но предпринимателю, который ищет деньги, вообще всё равно, что сказал Джобс. Он думает Где взять 200 тысяч? Что мне делать завтра?" Простите, дорогие) Я буду мене разрозненно подавать информацию)) И еще вот ег…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bragarnatalia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Погадаем? Ожидается, что обьем электронной коммерции, основанной на AI достигнет ____ к 2028 году.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 630,063 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Наталья Брагарь ГРАНТЫ 💬” (@bragarnatalia), 186 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bragarnatalia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.