Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BRADLEY COOKS 😈

@bradleycooks

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

788subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002293715066
TypeChannel
Username@bradleycooks
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bradleycooks

Growth

788789788.57 August 2026 β€” 789 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 789 subscribers15 August 2026 β€” 788 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 788–789 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 08:05788-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:46789no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:23789first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 December 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

145 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀9867.6%
πŸ”₯1913.1%
πŸ‘106.90%
πŸ’―106.90%
😁42.76%
πŸ₯±21.38%
πŸ‘€10.69%
🀣10.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 145reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 December 2025 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jul 2026, 12:43 UTC253 viewsread 8 August 2026

first MPP protocol on RH Plus MPP + X402 facilitator as well, so basically naven on steroids. Their NPM Packages are also live and running- https://www.npmjs.com/~rpp402 https://www.npmjs.com/package/@rpp402/protocol this one has 672 downloads already

13 Jul 2026, 12:42 UTC600 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

0x94FEf3763ED87051267dCd7FfC5DF416B6C03a7E

❀2

13 Jul 2026, 12:42 UTC572 viewsread 8 August 2026

I think this one is really interesting, some protocol on RH chain.

13 Jul 2026, 12:41 UTC558 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Going to share cooks again like I used to did before deploying coins.

❀2

31 May 2026, 19:30 UTC589 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I think current range 60k - 80k is a nice spot range for accumulating majors. Prob ranging a bit longer with a boring summer

❀4πŸ‘1

28 May 2026, 15:49 UTC614 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I removed my β€œOG” private group, I will be opening new one again soon.

πŸ”₯8😁4

30 Jan 2026, 08:46 UTC686 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I will start sharing more cooks again like the days before I became a dev. We printed a lot, won on every call. Let’s print again.

❀19πŸ‘3πŸ‘€1πŸ’―1🀣1

10 Jan 2026, 08:56 UTCβ‰ˆ1,330 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I was checking circumstances onchain. I noticed $WOJAK went from 55m to 26M now $NOTHING went from 5.5m to 2.2m now $KERMIT 5.7M to 2.5M Ofcourse the swing traders are very annoying, but hard to prevent. But I think circumstances are also not the best yet. Good news that good times will come soon.

❀12πŸ‘2πŸ₯±2

9 Jan 2026, 11:40 UTCβ‰ˆ1,060 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

this is true, happy they’re out now tho. https://x.com/deepfuckinfrog/status/2009590432506732748

❀6πŸ‘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bradleycooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œBRADLEY COOKS πŸ˜ˆβ€ (@bradleycooks), 788 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bradleycooks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.