Channel
@bpannouncementsofficial
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
135subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 16 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001509538188 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bpannouncementsofficial |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 25 November 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bpannouncementsofficial |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:57 | 135 | no change |
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:22 | 135 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 November 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
On a personal level, I'm particularly grateful for the support of advisors, backers, and partners throughout my computer hacking case and its outcome. Thank you for being there through thick and thin. When we battened down the hatches for the project's first winter in 2018, we believed it wasn't a matter of "if" but "when" blockchain would have a role in the IoT revolution. I still hold this belief today. Once you s…
As discussed previously, when the latest downturn began and was exacerbated by the FTX collapse, events no one could have anticipated, early-stage projects with tradable assets were subject to a vicious cycle which proved to be fatal in the vast majority of cases. In essence, like all projects, their asset prices were decimated in the winter. When market conditions eventually improved, funders opted to back new (pre-…
It is not uncommon for early-stage companies to go through recapitalization events when faced with turbulent market conditions. Funders might inject mission critical capital for a significant stake in a company to keep the lights on. In some instances, early backers face heavy dilution, but it is better than the company going under. We borrowed this line of thinking related to our token model, and evaluated if it was…
Hi everyone, In our last project update in June 2023, we detailed how the GEM token facility continued to be unviable given market conditions, and as a consequence, we were unable to resume mainnet development and instead were left with the option of "battening down the hatches" and remaining "default alive" for period of 12-24 months while we evaluated what might be possible moving forward. We discussed how there …
The “next step” would be to secure funding to further develop the ecosystem. Should we be successful in doing so, the operating plan funded will dictate the specific long-term goals. In general, they would focus on adoption metrics following a public technology launch. Q: When released from prison, will Jonathan remain CEO? If so, how will the team encourage people to trust, and invest in a project whose leader just…
(June 22, 2023) Please find the response to AMA questions submitted below. We filtered out any which were repetitive. Q: Is there possibility to rebrand the BP and swap the BP token to new one?similar happened to other token like FEG and ALLIANCE BLOCK and more A: As the funding climate improves, we will evaluate different ways to continue to build out the BP ecosystem. Should we secure funding to develop a new dig…
(June 15, 2023) Hi everyone, I am writing to follow-up to our latest update. As discussed, the project is in a precarious and uncertain position reminiscent of our positioning during the 2018 crypto winter. While many founders opted to shut down their projects, we opted to develop a skeleton operating plan, batten down the hatches, and remain "default alive" until conditions might improve. In 2021, our plan paid o…
In light of this, and given the current circumstances, our current moving forward is as follows: - re-evaluate market conditions in 30-45 days, consider if the GEM facility is viable to fund the continued execution of the mainnet plan - if not, consider a "worst case" scenario plan In either case, as always, we'll continue to press forward, navigating as best as we can. Regarding the corporate contingency plan - t…
(May 4, 2023) Hi everyone, I am writing with an update on the status of the project. As announced on April 23, an outcome to the computing hacking/hack back case I have been involved in was reached. From the outset, we have strived to be as transparent as possible about the matter, proactively disclosing it to all pre-salers, institutional investors, and relevant partners. We've discussed the circumstances in dept…
(March 10, 2023) Join us on Twitter Spaces on Sunday at 1:30pm ET for a discussion on the latest at Beyond Protocol and a deep dive into a powerful new use case. https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1YqJDowqwBaGV
(March 4, 2023) Hello everyone, I am writing with an update to our Pre-Staking programs on MyCointainer. In an effort to promote a sustainable token economy and the longevity of the project, we will be restructuring rates. This in line with the dates we originally projected for a reduction and also responsive to community feedback. Effective March 11, the new rates will be: 11.5 percent for BP 13.5 percent for BP…
(February 8, 2023) Hi everyone, Firstly, thank you to those who have dropped suggestions here. The feedback makes us better, and we will continue to do everything we can to adopt it. Secondly, I want to reiterate, we are still here building. In a couple in-depth messages a few weeks back, I detailed the circumstances surrounding mainnet and what we were working on. I also delved into this in our last AMA. To reca…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bpannouncementsofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Beyond Protocol Announcements” (@bpannouncementsofficial), 135 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bpannouncementsofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.