Channel
@botica_analytics
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
590subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003041312822 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @botica_analytics |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/botica_analytics |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 590 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 591 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 591 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (16 July 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 891 |
| Reactions total | 41 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
41 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 41.5% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 36.6% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 12.2% | |
| 🙈 | 3 | 7.32% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 2.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥 Сегодня последний день сниженных цен на тарифы для MAX Завтра цены возвращаются к прежним значениям. Осенью поднимем ещё раз. Сегодня можно зафиксировать выгоду: на любой срок и на любое количество каналов. ▪️ Бизнес: 990 ₽ вместо 1 990 ₽ за канал в месяц ▪️ Премиум: 1 490 ₽ вместо 3 990 ₽ за канал в месяц Скидка действует на весь оплаченный период. Оплатите год сегодня: весь год платите по сегодняшней цене. Под…
❤2
🎁 Подарок вам на выходные, но только на 3 дня Скидка 50% на все тарифы и любой БОТИКИ для каналов в MAX. Только до конца дня 3 августа. Ведете канал в MAX или планируете заходить? Сейчас лучший момент подключить аналитику. А чтобы было понятно, зачем: реальные цифры участников «Битвы директологов» за вторую неделю. Не теория, а живые кейсы с трафиком из Яндекс Директа на каналы в MAX: ▪️ Психология: 81 подписка по…
❤2
🔥 Что сейчас реально работает в Яндекс Директе, а где можно просто слить бюджет? Сегодня в 11:30 участники «Битвы директологов» выйдут в прямой эфир и покажут свои первые результаты. Разберём, какие решения уже сработали, что вообще не оправдало ожиданий и что пришлось менять прямо во время запуска. Если вы сами работаете с Директом, то сможете посмотреть на реальные рекламные кампании, сравнить разные подходы и …
🥊 Первая неделя «Битвы директологов» подошла к концу! С каждым созвонились и пообщались лично, посмотрели на стратегии и запустили рекламные кампании: Встречаем первые серии на наших каналах в 😄ВК и 😉YOUTUBE Что из интересного? • 4 абсолютно разные ниши • 4 совершенно разных подхода • 4 разных виденья Обязательно смотреть, вдохновляться идеями и матать на ус. Отдельно хочется отметить подготовительный процесс Ан…
❤4🔥2
Встречайте мульти-лендинги в Ботике 🎉 Вы долго просили, а мы долго делали, но сделали 😂 Теперь на один счётчик Яндекс Метрики можно создавать неограниченное количество лендингов и посадочных постов. Что это даёт на практике? - запускаете больше рекламных кампаний параллельно, не плодя счётчики; - тестируете разные офферы, креативы и посадочные без лишней рутины в настройке; - алгоритмы Директа обучаются быстрее …
❤3🔥2🙏1
MAX уже перерос статус «мессенджера» и вот почему В рамках Российской Креативной Недели, провели сессию «MAX: от мессенджера к супераппу». Серёжа Грудинин из MaxDash вывел графики роста. Почти 90 млн MAU в MAX vs 75 млн в TG. Такие темпы роста за год впечатляют. Максим Пасютин ФОРМЕДИА показал, как команда развивает мессенджер изнутри. Самый громкий инсайт: по его словам, на MAX сейчас зарабатывают уже больше, че…
Стоимость подписчика — это же просто бюджет делить на количество подписавшихся? Не совсем, и вот почему это важно понимать перед тем, как читать отчёт по рекламе. Обычно считают так: потратили бюджет, разделили на число новых подписчиков, получили цену за одного. Это быстрый расчёт, но он завышает реальный результат кампании. Есть 2 причины, из-за которых так происходит. 💚 Боты Часть подписчиков вообще не живые л…
🔥3❤2👍2
Сегодня MAX пропал из Google Play. Установленные версии работают без ограничений, обновления доступны в RuStore, AppGallery и других магазинах. ⚡ В ролике рассказали, что стало с MAX через месяц после удаления из App Store. Подключить Ботику
🙈3👍2🔥2
Дождались! Битва директологов начинается 💚 Пять сильных специалистов. Пять реальных проектов. Четыре недели, чтобы доказать, кто умеет приводить подписчиков в МАКС-каналы быстрее, дешевле и эффективнее остальных. Участники будут запускать рекламу через Яндекс Директ, показывать свои решения, делиться результатами и отчитываться перед зрителями. Но финальное слово останется за вами. Именно зрители будут голосовать …
🔥6❤4👍1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @botica_analytics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 169,513 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“БОТИКА ДЛЯ ТЕЛЕГРАМ” (@botica_analytics), 590 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/botica_analytics.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.