hello friends The new robot that was officially introduced by Paws channel and the mining process will start in 26 days Do not miss this robot Link bot 👇 Zoo @bot_notcoin
🔥5👍2😁1

Channel
@bot_notcoin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
242subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002093503013 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bot_notcoin |
| Description | Hi @durov This channel does not go against the law. And it has no pornographic and rough posts. please pay attention! Official Channel in the @Telegram No Spam owner : @Rucsie |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bot_notcoin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 242 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 242 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
218 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 73 | 33.5% | |
| 👍 | 60 | 27.5% | |
| 🤩 | 22 | 10.1% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 9.63% | |
| 🕊 | 13 | 5.96% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 4.13% | |
| 😍 | 6 | 2.75% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.38% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.38% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.917% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.917% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.917% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.459% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.459% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 218reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2024 to 4 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
hello friends The new robot that was officially introduced by Paws channel and the mining process will start in 26 days Do not miss this robot Link bot 👇 Zoo @bot_notcoin
🔥5👍2😁1
https://t.me/PAWSOG_bot/PAWS?startapp=54NwwePe Link bot 🚀
🔥3
New 🪂🪂🪂🪂🪂 Link : Paws 🔥🔥🔥 Created by notcoin and dogs 💎🤑
🔥3
Hi friend's The new Airdrop of Notcoin was introduced under the name of notpixel This airdrop is the most reliable and valuable telegram airdrop Take this airdrop seriously and don't miss it. Link bot 🔺 https://t.me/notpixel/app?startapp=f1095887275_s573790 @bot_notcoin
🔥30❤21👍10🏆1
#FREEDUROV 👮♂️
👍25🔥18🕊13💔2
Signed 𝑨𝑯𝑶𝑼𝑹𝑨
Hi friend's 👋 Mine Airdrop Dogs will stop on August 14. 😖 You have only 4 days to mine If you haven't started yet, start the robot right now 🤑 Pre-sale of this token has started and withdrawal of this token will be released on August 15 📈 Link bot 🔥 https://t.me/dogshouse_bot/join?startapp=pYe6j2pyQYW5pqCbGwK7XQ @dogshouse_bot ☑️
🤩19👍16🔥10👏9❤🔥2💯2🏆1
Signed 𝑨𝑯𝑶𝑼𝑹𝑨
The new task of Notcoin 🤑 @bot_notcoin
Signed 𝑨𝑯𝑶𝑼𝑹𝑨
Add list 😖 https://t.me/addlist/SbtwpLQaMBVhMmMx @bot_notcoin 👑
Signed 𝑨𝑯𝑶𝑼𝑹𝑨
1.000.000 coin = 700 $ 📈
👍1
Signed 𝑨𝑯𝑶𝑼𝑹𝑨
Only 24 hours left of this airdrop mine 🤑 This currency is listed in 7 major exchanges in the world such as BingX and... 📈 By doing the tasks, you can get a lot of coins 🌟 Link bot : 👁 @monorixBot https://t.me/monorixbot?start=1095887275
Signed 𝑨𝑯𝑶𝑼𝑹𝑨
🔸 Description of NatCoin game (Lost Dogs): 🔹 According to the picture you can see, three cards are presented daily from different places in the game, and you have to choose one of them... Which one should we choose now? For example, today he asked us to find the card that gets the average vote, these votes are given by the players and you have to guess which one of these cards will get the second number of votes, a…
🔥1
Signed 𝑨𝑯𝑶𝑼𝑹𝑨
🔸 New NotCoin game has been released, which lasts only 6 weeks! 🔹 This is a daily game and it doesn't take much time. In exchange for winning, it gives you WOOF$ tokens that you can convert into Natcoins. (Each 10 WOOF$ equals 250 NOT$) >> Login to the game Lost Dogs << I will explain how to play the game in the next post Link bot 👇🏼 https://t.me/lost_dogs_bot/lodoapp?startapp=ref-u_1095887275__s_573790 @bot_…
👍1🔥1😍1
Signed 𝑨𝑯𝑶𝑼𝑹𝑨
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bot_notcoin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,191,821 of 1,629,372entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@bot_notcoin named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bot notcoin” (@bot_notcoin), 242 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bot_notcoin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.