Привет. Меня позвали в это шоу прожарка эзотерика гостем. Как думаете, выдержу 1,5 часа разбора меня?
❤7🔥7😁4

Channel
@boston_ilya
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
340subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001170931792 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @boston_ilya |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/boston_ilya |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 340 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 341 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 340 | no change |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 340 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
190 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 105 | 55.3% | |
| 🔥 | 34 | 17.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 6.32% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 6.32% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 4.21% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 3.16% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 2.63% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 2.11% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 1.05% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Привет. Меня позвали в это шоу прожарка эзотерика гостем. Как думаете, выдержу 1,5 часа разбора меня?
❤7🔥7😁4
Вчера рассказал свой сон в инсте и оказалось , что такое приснилось не только мне.
❤2
Друзья, помимо формы земли мне очень интересна генетика и функционал тела. Возможно, на меня повлияло окончание лицея на отделении химик-биолог, а может это с прошлой жизни еще что-то. Поэтому сегодня думаю займусь роликом на тему генов. Конечно, самые жесткие и важные темы я тоже скоро затрону. Я про всадников апокалипсиса и цифровой рейтинг. План такой, посмотрим как оно пойдет. Тем написал штук 20 на ближайшее вр…
❤🔥11
Привет. Рассказываю как мои дела. Последний месяц был прорывным. Я стал интересен зрителю и зрителей стало больше на 5000 человек, просмотры уверенно идут к 800.000 в месяц и честно, я в ахуе. Тк я всегда сидел в своей ракушке и мусолил мысли внутри себя, особо ими не делясь. Ощущение , что блог - это самое крутое что я делал. У меня появился страх, что интерес ко мне закончится и что это просто случайно так сложилос…
❤14
спойлер темы следующего рилса. Кто догадался о чем он будет?
❤4👀2
Вчера Дима лайкнул мой пост о плоской земле и спустя день я вижу его пост. Расплываюсь в улыбке. Свои рядом.
👏9🔥4❤2
Вы понимаете да в каком я шоке . Учитывая , что я готовлю сегодня новый ролик я просто на пике эмоций)
🔥13❤3
Запрещая себе быть неформатом-мы обкрадываем мир, спуская его в банальность и деградацию. Именно уникальность каждого из нас -делает мир интересным и не дает ему уйти в деменцию и деградацию. Именно твоя инаковость возможность «путешествия на другой край планеты для того, кто всю жизнь сидел в четырех стенах». Моя самая большая мечта юношества петь свою музыку. Ходил на занятия, хорошо занимались на самом деле. Пели…
❤18❤🔥1
Кто хочет со мной в Кронштадт на досъем эксперимента?
❤5🥰4
Voice message, posted without a caption
👍6❤4
Думаю, можно не комментировать.
❤6⚡2💯2
Есть среди вас тот , кто шарит в геометрии? Желательно преподаватель. Ну или просто супер мозг. Нужно еще раз меня перепроверить.
👏3❤1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @boston_ilya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Выбираем тему👀
The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 24 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Илья Бостон live” (@boston_ilya), 340 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/boston_ilya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.