Channel
@bors_yaar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
724subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001175062044 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bors_yaar |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bors_yaar |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:20 | 724 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 724 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 January 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 368 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
211 reactions across 19 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 188 | 89.1% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 10.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 211reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#شاخص_کل امیدوارم روزگارتون مثل سبزی این روزهای بورس باشه. بطور خلاصه مقاومت ها شاخص کل محدوده های 5/400( که بنظر درحال عبور از آن هستیم) و مقاومت های بعدی 6/000میلیون و 7/000میلیون واحد خواهند بود. حدضرر برای شاخص کل 4/700 درنظر گرفته میشود.
👍9🔥4
لازمه هر معامله ای در قدم اول تعیین حدضرر هست پیشنهاد میشه کسانی که امروز به مثقال ورود کردند و کوتاه مدتی هستن حدضرر روی عدد ۱۳۲۰۰۰ تنظیم کنند
👍12
#مثقال در تایم فریم 30دقیقه همینطور که مشخص هست قیمت درون یک کانال نزولی درحال حرکت بوده و به محدوده های جذابی رسیده ، کسانی که قصد ورود به طلا دارند درصورت مشاهده شکست سقف کانال (حدودا 135450) میتوانند یک پله ورود داشته باشند
👍8
سلام و درود فراوان خدمت عزیزان بصورت خیلی خلاصه و مفید میتوان گفت محدوده های 148 هزارتومن و 130 هزارتومن در #دلار و #تتر حمایت های بسیار کلیدی و طلائی هستند که میتوان انتظار اتمام ریزش در این نواحی را داشت. کسانی که قصد خرید طلا دارند هم میتوانند معاملات دلار رو تحت نظر داشته باشند و با دیدن نشانه های اتمام اصلاح معاملات خودشون رو انجام بدن
👍16
😕😔
🔥6
پیشنهاد میشه کسانی که کوتاه مدتی تتر دارند حدضرر روی ۱۶۴ تنظیم کنند
👍7🔥2
پزشکیان: با راهنماییهای رهبر معظم تلاش کردیم مسیر مذاکرات را مدیریت کنیم و از وضعیت فرسایشی "نه جنگ و نه صلح" عبور کنیم. ؟!
🔥5👍3
مروری بر اخبار و تاریخ رویترز به نقل از یک مقام ایرانی: «امکان دستیابی به یک توافق موقت وجود دارد.» پن: تقریبا تمام مقامات ایرانی تا رئیس جمهور این جمله بالا را گفته اند.( بجز رهبر!) تمام مقامات آمریکایی در رسانه اعلام کردند دنبال غنی سازی صفر هستند اما ایرانی ها اعلام کردند در نشست قبلی از طرف آمریکایی پیشنهادهای عملی و امیدوارکننده دریافت کرده اند (طبق اخرین توئیت پزشکیان) و اکنون باید پاسخ مکتوبی به آن بدهند. تن…
👍5🔥2
تو یه سری از کانال های مطرح بورسی مذاکرات به بن بست رسیده و ترامپ درحال بررسی گزینه های دیگر هست! تو یه سری کانال های دیگه هم پیشرفت زیادی حاصل شده و درحال کار روی متن توافقنامه هستن پن: خیلیییی سخت میشه فهمید کی سهم فروخته کی سهم خریده😅 مگه نه؟
👍15
برای کسایی که دوست ندارن اخبار رو دنبال کنن از نظر تحلیلی اگر قیمت #تتر با بالای ۱۶۸ جامپکرد بدونید جنگ قطعی و اگر به زیر ۱۵۴ رفت بتونید تفاهمی درکار خواهد بود
👍18
مثل اینکه سکوت سنگینی فضا رو دربر گرفته.. هرچی که هست انشاالله خیر باشه برای جهانیان و آیندگان باید نوشت ما در جهنمی زیسته ایم که شما تنها درباره آن خوانده اید!
👍20
🔺وزیر خارجه ترکیه: 🔹آمریکا با غنیسازی اورانیوم توسط ایران در چهارچوب حدودی مشخص، موافقت کرده است/انتخاب پن: بنظرم خیلی نباید در قدم اول به این خبر دل خوش کرد چون خبر به این مهمی رو چرا ۲طرف مذاکره کننده بیان نکردن؟ و باید از ترکیه که در مذاکره حاضر نبوده بشنویم؟
👍11
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bors_yaar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
نتیجه مذاکرات جمعه؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بورس یار” (@bors_yaar), 724 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bors_yaar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.