Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Борода Ираклия | «Факел» Воронеж

@borokve

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

56subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002443592741
TypeChannel
Username@borokve
DescriptionТолько «Факел» и Воронеж и Россия Навсегда.
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/borokve

Growth

567 August 2026 — 56 subscribers10 August 2026 — 56 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55–57 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 07:4556no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:1056first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 2 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
150.8%
avg views ÷ 56 subscribers
Avg views / post
84.5
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held18 (2 June 20268 August 2026)
Views total929
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
119
Videos
38
Links
91

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1438.9%
😁822.2%
💯513.9%
👍38.33%
🙏25.56%
🤡25.56%
🔥12.78%
🤔12.78%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC30 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @xlestfootballPhoto

- О, меня в Воронеж позвали! - Нет, Артемка, мы переходим на YouTube! Дорский ждет в «ЭФБ!»

😁2

8 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC210 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

«Экс-коуч «Акрона» будет рассмотрен «Факелом», если не пойдет у Василенко. И тогда в Воронеже могут в связке оказаться Тедеев и Дзюба» — Сергей Ильёв @borokve

1

7 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC33 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @skvoztumaanPhoto

Ираклий Квеквескири близок к переходу в Медиалигу Прямо сейчас опорный полузащитник находится без клуба. Были разговоры с профессиональными командами, но без конкретики. Последние дни Квеквескири тренируется с «Лит Энерджи». Также был разговор с «2Drots», но в итоге «Лит Энерджи» оказался более удобным вариантом в том числе из-за расположения тренировок. Сегодня Ираклий сыграл в товарищеском матче. С большей доле

27 Jul 2026, 10:21 UTC50 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @fakelonvrn36Photo

🇷🇺🇷🇺Руслан Пименов: «Не хватило креатива в атаке» Спортивный директор «Факела» эксклюзивно для нашего канала поделился впечатлениями о прошедшей игре: 🗣️ При отрицательном результате играли, боролись, игроки вышедшие на замену тоже игру усилили, но не хватило опыта, а Махачкала вытерпела и забила нам из трех моментов два. Чего не хватило? Креатива в атаке. Играли чуть-чуть предсказуемо, не смотря на автогол действов

2

25 Jul 2026, 17:57 UTC45 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @myachrusPhoto

❌💙 «Нижний» наложил бан на продажу Майга. Клуб не отпускает игрока в «Факел» По нашей информации, Мамаду мог бы вернуться в РПЛ: 31-летним малийцем интересовалось несколько клубов. Но больше всех полузащитника хотел бы видеть в своих рядах «Факел». Однако «Нижний» обозначил, что лидера они не продадут, переговоры невозможны. По сути, волжский клуб наложил бан на продажу Майга. При этом «Нижний» повышать игроку лич

24 Jul 2026, 15:05 UTC46 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Путь от «Я "Факел" вообще не видел» до «"Факел" — на прямой вылет, перспектив у "Факела" вообще нет» занял пару секунд. Аналитика подъехала! https://t.me/fcfakel36/14841 @borokve

🤡2😁1

24 Jul 2026, 11:29 UTC40 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Вечные вопросы «Где форма?» и «Когда форма?» — закрыты. Промо — чистый топ! @borokve

23 Jul 2026, 09:16 UTC42 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

💔 Шота Чихрадзе получил перелом плюсневой кости Молодой защитник «Факела», находящийся в аренде в «Металлурге», получил травму в матче с пензенским «Зенитом». В официальных соцсетях «Металлурга» пишут, что «даже к облегчённым тренировкам он приступит не скоро». А ChatGPT дал примерный срок восстановления — 8-12 недель. @borokve

🙏21

23 Jul 2026, 08:55 UTC46 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Агент Лепсая: «Единственный актуальный вопрос по поводу “Факела“: вылетели ли они?» Дальше — утомивший набор шуток про Пуси и вопрос: «Что делать Василенко, если ему там не с кем работать?» 🙂 @borokve

😁1

21 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC311 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Прогнозы резидентов «ЭФБ» на РПЛ-2026/27 Крысева продолжает топить за «Факел» и стал единственным, кто верит в спасение от прямого вылета. Экс-тренер «Факела» Игорь Шалимов — не верит. @borokve

1

18 Jul 2026, 14:17 UTC76 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

«Факел» не внёс в заявку сразу семерых футболистов. На сайте РПЛ появились заявки клубов перед стартом сезона. В заявке «Факела» отсутствуют: • Игорь Обухов • Илья Гапонов • Макс Дзиов • Кирилл Симонов • Нури Абдоков • Антон Ковалёв • Мераби Уридия @borokve

3

13 Jul 2026, 18:57 UTC74 viewsread 10 August 2026

Улыбка Руслана Пименова — с нами! https://t.me/pfcfakel/26785 @borokve

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @borokve. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Борода Ираклия | «Факел» Воронеж” (@borokve), 56 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/borokve.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.