Channel
@borodkinaolya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
927subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001324729349 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @borodkinaolya |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/borodkinaolya |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 927 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 931 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 931 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 11 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (11 March 2026 – 19 July 2026) |
| Views total | 901 |
| Reactions total | 45 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
224 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 171 | 76.3% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 5.80% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 5.80% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 5.36% | |
| 💋 | 9 | 4.02% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 2.23% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 0.446% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 224reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Но первый триместр научил меня другому. Замедляться. Просить о помощи. И не винить себя за то, что сегодня у меня нет сил. Беременность — это не только красивые фотографии с округлившимся животиком. Иногда это дни, когда единственная победа — съесть несколько ложек супа и не почувствовать себя хуже. И знаете) Несмотря на токсикоз, усталость и эмоциональные качели, внутри растёт маленькая жизнь. И ради этого, кажется,…
❤25
Обещанный пост про 1 триместр и знакомство с токсикозом. В первую беременность я не столкнулась с токсикозом, была активна и бодра, думала что это все сказки😅 но вторая беременность привела меня в чувства. Я думала первый триместр это про счастье и осознание, а Оказалось.. Это про то, как однажды просыпаешься и понимаешь, что твоё тело больше тебе не принадлежит. Про постоянную тошноту. Когда не помогает ни сон, ни…
❤20
Как я рассказала мужу🤍 #беременность@borodkinaolya
❤20😁13🥰4
Рассказываю о том как я узнала😅 Неделю думала, что болею. Температура держалась стабильно 37,2-37,5 не спадала вообще🫠 А она самая противная, я думаю вы знаете. Сдавала все анализы, пила витамины, ничего непонятно. По итогу уже пошла задержка😅 И вуаля, это Оказалось что наш малыш так проверял маму😅 Про первый триместр и токсикоз это будет отдельная история🙈🙈🙈 #беременность@borodkinaolya
❤23
Самая главная новость конечно, о нашем пополнении в семье🤍 В запрещенной сети я уже поделилась давно, теперь делюсь здесь, вдруг кто еще не знает 😅 Волнительно делиться всегда, потому что очень трепетное событие🤍 #беременность@borodkinaolya
❤37
Всем привет, мои хорошие🤍 Спустя 4 месяца я сюда вернулась, добралась так сказать😅 Новостей куча, соскучилась по своему дневничку и нашему общению🤍 Буду всем делиться с вами🤍 Готовьте сердечки😅🤍
❤30💋9🥰1😇1
Классный вечер сегодня был🧡 Первый день 3-го Международного турнира по баскетболу 3х3 на кубок Губернатора Челябинской области🔥
🔥11❤6
Кстати, кто вдруг не знал) Сообщаю😅 Мой любименький PIMS открылся наконец-то у нас в Челябинске!😍 На белом рынке) (И я была бы рада если бы это было рекламой, но это не она🤣 за все заплатил Артём Юрьевич) Боженька услышал мои молитвы😍 Я готова его пить эври дей😅 Обязательно попробуйте🤍 Наши любимые вкусы это мангоу с тапиокой и страугрэнни с тапиокой(клубничный и манго короче😅)
👍13❤10🔥1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @borodkinaolya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Olya Borodkina🤍” (@borodkinaolya), 927 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/borodkinaolya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.