4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 343–349 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 03:13
344
-4
22 Aug 2026, 21:24
348
+1
15 Aug 2026, 15:49
347
no change
14 Aug 2026, 19:03
347
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.56%
avg views ÷ 344 subscribers
Avg views / post
26.0
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
25.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
7 (13 August 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
182
Reactions total
47
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
18s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
47 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
19
40.4%
💔
13
27.7%
custom 6185862897587980095
7
14.9%
💅
7
14.9%
😱
1
2.13%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
По классике, всё новое – это хорошо забытое старое: в моду входят два старых тренда
Лонгсливы с рукавом три четверти. Даже самая закрытая модель с таким рукавом выглядит более уютной и расслабленной
Глубокий треугольный вырез, особенно с запáхом. Очень нравится как это выглядит, но я не понимаю, как носить, чтобы всё оставалось на своих местах и не прибегая к скотчу для одежды
Но самый идеальный вариант – это объе…
Девочки, кто разбирается, это реальные фотографии со свадьбы Тейлор Свифт? Если да, то я не понимаю, почему моё инфополе не взорвалось с обсуждением её свадебного платья. Обсуждать особо и нечего, но это же Тейлор Свифт. Каждый её шаг в интернете со всех сторон освещается
Мне попался аккаунт девушки, которая кастомизирует вещи так, будто это кутюр или дизайнерская вещь. Вот одна из её работ. Это тот уровень кастомизации, к которому я стремлюсь🙏🏻
P.S. на следующей неделе планирую штурмовать секонды, буду искать что-то интересно для кастома и потом выставлять на Авито
Годы идут, всё меняется, но стиль Кристен Стюарт остается неизменным. Вот кто бы ещё, кроме неё, смог вывести такую немытую панкушную укладку
А вообще, кстати, хорошее ипсо для кэжуал образа
Николь Кидман для Vogue в Alexander McQueen, 2009 год
Как же эстетично смотрятся зонтики от солнца. Их конечно менее удобно носить с собой, чем обычные от дождя, но как бы они спасали от солнца и дополняли образ
Пока я в тик токе бомблю на новую обложку Vogue с Кайей Гербер и Гомером Гиром (одни из главным героев в сериале «Осколки»), давайте полюбуемся на шикарную Bad Girl Riri в сентябрьском номере Elle
💔4❤2custom 61858628975879800952
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @borntobuyy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“born to buy” (@borntobuyy), 344 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/borntobuyy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
