Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ДЫРА

@bore_hole

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

169subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001494497896
TypeChannel
Username@bore_hole
Descriptionвсе ли, что попадает в дыру, можно обнаружить в ней же? в поисках исчезающего вида — способа мыслить иначе. поэзия, магия, феминизм, машины и производство аффекта для связи: @chernna
CreatedBetween 1 May 2019 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/bore_hole

Growth

1698 Aug 2026, 04:35 — 169 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 15:15 — 169 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 04:358 Aug 2026, 15:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 168–170 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 15:15169no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:35169first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 24 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.5%
avg views ÷ 169 subscribers
Avg views / post
60.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held13 (24 October 20255 August 2026)
Views total120
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
34
Videos
1
Links
13

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

113 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53102315768968808653833.6%
custom 53053304222116887303127.4%
custom 53439628155205901962623.0%
custom 54632273528865729601311.5%
custom 540482872121754991532.65%
custom 534387603141140695210.885%
custom 540258602243956418910.885%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC58 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

в последнем лодочном походе по Неаполитанскому заливу я собрала ридинг из коротких текстов для нашей команды и привязала их к маршруту Неаполь – Капри – Амальфи – Искья – Прочида. мне было важно соединить в сборнике разные способы смотреть, но то ли в силу формата, то ли в силу отсутствия перевода почти все авторы смотрят на Италию снаружи. делюсь нашим site-specific ридингом 🩷Иван Бунин “Остров сирен” – текст-путев

custom 53053304222116887304custom 54632273528865729602

5 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC62 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

genius loci & hello to mezzogiorno если есть что-то более нежно мной любимое, чем путешествия, то это путешествия с site-specific литературой. мой опыт чтения часто приводит к ритмической синхронизации. это значит, что сюжетные повороты рифмуются с местом, действием или состоянием, в котором я нахожусь. я сажусь в самолет, открываю “Распознавание образов” Гибсона и на первой странице читаю фразу: «у душ есть ограни

custom 53053304222116887304

8 Mar 2026, 21:31 UTC520 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

под закат международного женского дня и по следам семинара по философии любви несу цитату немецкого романтика Фридриха Шлегеля о возвышенной безграничности женского аффекта 🪷 Совсем иначе обстояло бы дело с женщинами. Между ними нет непосвященных; ведь каждая из них имеет в себе целиком всю любовь, неисчерпаемая сущность которой дается нашему мужскому изучению и пониманию лишь постепенно. Уже развернутая или в зарод

custom 531023157689688086511

11 Feb 2026, 19:38 UTC476 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

в Нидерландах существует поэтическая инициативa, благодаря которой во время похорон одиноких людей присутствует поэт и читает специально написанное для умершего стихотворение. я настаиваю, что у каждого человека есть безусловное базовое право быть увековеченным хотя бы в одном стихотворении сегодня 40 дней со дня смерти дедушки. в память о нем хочу поделиться стихотворением, которое я написала накануне его захоронен

custom 534396281552059019622custom 54025860224395641891

7 Feb 2026, 13:18 UTC274 viewsread 8 August 2026

внимание и его дефицит определенно стало личной темой прошлого года. поэтому завтрашняя кайференция становится способом подвести итоги 2025. приходите! будет глубоко, неглупо и весело

7 Feb 2026, 13:18 UTC304 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kaiferencePhoto

почему внимание? предыдущие кайференции пытались ответить на глобальные, острые и неоднозначные вопросы мира высокой энтропии: природа кайфа, как и где жить, что такое близость? в этом году амбиция не меньше — попробуем вместе разобраться, что такое внимание мы застали переход главной экономической ценности от энергоносителей (например, нефти) сначала к данным (т.н. новой нефти), и сейчас к вниманию как к ресурсу.

custom 53053304222116887305

29 Dec 2025, 09:24 UTC463 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

очень нравится взгляд Аллы Митрофановой на LLM как на компас для навигации в пространстве смыслов модели умеют обсчитывать самый вероятный вариант, а значит именно это становится их ахиллесовой пятой с точки зрения потенциальных манипуляций. собственно, аналог SEO-оптимизации для LLM уже существует

custom 54632273528865729604

27 Dec 2025, 18:16 UTC431 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @animalmineralPhoto

мультфильм «Анастасия» / across my memory напомнила и деконструировала: Надя Чернякевич в возрасте 8 лет у меня был величайший гиперфикс на мультфильме «Анастасия» (1997). сегодня хочу поделиться набором фактов и размышлений, почему этот мультфильм так сильно может запасть в душу и выделиться на фоне остальных принцесс 🌟 эффект барбары стрейзанд, ставший самосбывающимся пророчеством многие воспринимают этот мульт

custom 530533042221168873013

23 Dec 2025, 18:01 UTC342 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

рандомный фрактал или визуальное свидетельство того, насколько женщины близки к флоре попробуйте угадать в чем секрет, что это и почему именно женщины? ответ спрячу под спойлер, но в посте есть подсказки на изображении эстроген, который кристаллизуясь во влагалищных и цервикальных выделениях образует изображения папоротника и это очень красиво! 🌟

custom 531023157689688086512custom 53053304222116887305custom 53439628155205901963custom 54632273528865729603

21 Dec 2025, 15:28 UTC299 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

наши открытки про то, что я люблю: физическое и магическое говорят в унисон. сегодня празднуется зимнее солнцестояние, оно же Йоль в традиции праздников Колеса Года. на самом деле новый год происходит сегодня и он посвящен тишине и надежде на то, что тьма рано или поздно уступит свету. солнце обязательно вернется причем здесь второе начало термодинамики? порядок возможен в обмен на энергию, а значит — см. 1 карточку

custom 54632273528865729604custom 54048287212175499153

21 Dec 2025, 15:06 UTC228 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @levels_of_abstractionPhoto

по поводу зимнего солнцестояния вместе с женой сделали открыток от лица второго начала термодинамики (оно же The 2nd Law, оно же энтропия замкнутых систем всегда возрастает) в комментариях делитесь своими афоризмами на тему или вызывайте пояснительную бригада если требуется. этот закон в нашей вселенной желательно понимать хорошо #всмысли

custom 53102315768968808655

6 Nov 2025, 13:10 UTC407 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Barbara Hammer Sappho, 1979

custom 53102315768968808658

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @bore_hole. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,066,069 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ДЫРА” (@bore_hole), 169 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bore_hole.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.