Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BoostClicks - Евгений Леонтьев

Channel

BoostClicks - Евгений Леонтьев

@boostclicks

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,767subscribers

+84 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002214324755
TypeChannel
Username@boostclicks
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/boostclicks

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,6832,7672,7257 August 2026 — 2,683 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,683 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,693 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,701 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,720 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,726 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,722 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,729 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,745 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,752 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,756 subscribers6 September 2026 — 2,757 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,761 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,759 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,767 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net +84. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,670–2,780 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 09:582,767+8
14 Sept 2026, 09:192,759-2
10 Sept 2026, 23:182,761+4
6 Sept 2026, 08:182,757+1
1 Sept 2026, 22:032,756+4
29 Aug 2026, 20:462,752+7
27 Aug 2026, 02:122,745+16
24 Aug 2026, 08:182,729+7
21 Aug 2026, 02:042,722-4
17 Aug 2026, 18:182,726+6
14 Aug 2026, 08:182,720+19
11 Aug 2026, 06:032,701+8
7 Aug 2026, 23:532,693+10
7 Aug 2026, 00:152,683no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:032,683first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

151 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6945.7%
🔥4026.5%
👍3019.9%
😁117.28%
👏10.662%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
62
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 19 we hold a reading for · 47%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @boostclicks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC174 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

БОЛЬШОЙ розыгрыш Facebook-аккаунтов от 3kota.shop 🌐 ⨉ 🐈‍⬛ на 200 USDT 1 победитель получит: 2шт. 🇺🇸 OLD [US] | 2007-2011 | 2FA 2шт. 🇺🇸 OLD [US] | 2012-2018 | 2FA 2шт. 🇺🇸 Кинг [US] |14 дней ручной фарм | 2FA | ФП 2шт. 🇺🇦 Кинг [UA] | 7 дней ручной фарм | 2FA | ФП | БМ 2шт. ✅️ Вериф БМ3 [OLD US] | 3 РК Подпишись на: @shop_3kota 🐈‍⬛ @teashannibal 🪓 @boostclicks 🔩 @creativeforcpa 😎 @StalkerOK_blog ☢️ Нажми кнопку "УЧАСТ…

❤6

4 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC366 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Хочу просто напомнить: После 1 сентября 2026 года для всех операций с доменами .RU, .РФ и .SU потребуется подтверждение администратора через Госуслуги. В связи с этим, перенес все свои сайты и сервисы на новые домены, вот списочек: uniq.down-web.com - уникализатор down-web.com - скачать сайт (+ пробить кло) bg.down-web.com - удалить фон с фото boostclicks.tech - сайт, просто сайт cloud.boostclicks.tech - бесплатный…

🔥10👍2

1 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC505 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кстати, а за что могут забанить? Вот например захотите вы сделать сервис для отрисовки каких-нибудь картинок из psd шаблонов фотошопа, которые очень сильно похожи наапример на какой нибудь документ, какой нибудь страны. Хотя атата, так нельзя и мы такое осуждаем! И тут Клавдия или ГПТ говорят - пздц, ты че творишь то? Так нельзя. И прилетает вам или мне абуза. Хотя мне за котиков прилетела абуза 100% 🐈 А любая кит…

❤6

1 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC445 views7 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Решил снова вернуться в кодекс и потестить новые крипто-модели. В итоге через 3 дня после покупки подписки, у меня опять офнули акк. Классика уже Короче ебал я покупать в этом месяце Клавдию и опять тратить 200+ usd на подписку, предлагаю челлендж. Месяц чисто фришные доступы. Сейчас поставил Kimi K3 Через токен роутер при регистрации дают 50 миллионов токенов бесплатно. Ссылка Работает в vscode - расширение Cline У…

❤4🔥3

31 Jul 2026, 09:45 UTC453 views4 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

То Google, то FB. Спокойно жить не дают 😅 Последнее время ощущение, что картам достается не меньше, чем самим рекламным кабинетам. В Google частенько заворачивают платежи, в FB начинают капризничать BIN'ы. Только все разогнал, пошел нормальный спенд — и уже снова ищешь, на что перевязаться. Когда и без того хватает головной боли, хочется, чтобы хотя бы карты просто не подводили. С LuckyCards можно спокойно занима…

❤4

27 Jul 2026, 13:53 UTC524 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @klm_nutraPhoto

В поиске медиа баеров на позиции : junior facebook - требования : уметь пользоваться ads manager facebook, кейтаро , фбтул, антик Умение минимальное в нутре и смежных вертикалях приветствуется.

❤5

24 Jul 2026, 17:17 UTC671 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня вышла Claude Opus 5 Что хорошего: модель практически на уровне Claude Fable 5, а в чем то то даже лучше, но по цене в два раза дешевле. Юзаем? Или ну ее нах, впереди выходные.

🔥6

24 Jul 2026, 05:36 UTC704 views8 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Выкатил пачку обновлений по КЛО SDK для сайтов (React / Vue / Next.js / Node.js) - доступен на любом тарифе, можно встраивать в свои приложения через npm Реферальная программа с выплатами до 30% Проверка кликов по известным конкурентам Так же напоминаю что доступна триалка

❤5👍2🔥1

17 Jul 2026, 06:02 UTC899 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Немного ситуации с гуглом Прилетел сейчас казалось бы стандартный отклон, по пачке причин: - Несоответствие целевой страницы - Обход системы - Взломанный сайт Вроде ничего странного, обычная пятница любого гугл баера. Но есть некоторые нюансы... Все 67 обьявлений на этом аккаунте стопнуты еще в 2016 году. Да, через 10 лет гугл очнулся и понял что он что то упустил.

😁10❤3

14 Jul 2026, 18:23 UTC823 views11 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Поигрался с разметкой Telegram Rich Messages, выглядит уже более человечно конечно. Жаль что только по api пока можно публиковать, но в целом без сложностей. Такой панчлайн...

👍11

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @boostclicks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BoostClicks - Евгений Леонтьев” (@boostclicks), 2,767 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/boostclicks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.